About
one hundred years later, after Ethiopia had passed through the great convulsions of
Gragn's wars, Manoel de Almeida described the town in his chapter XXI,
Acçum and its
Antiquities (Beckingham and Huntingford 1954: 90ff);
It is situated on the edge of very broad meadows in a gap where they come in between
two hills. Today it is a place of about a hundred inhabitants. Everywhere there ruins are
to be seen, not of walls, towers, and splendid palaces, but of many houses of stone and
mud which show that the town was formerly very large.
Much of this was presumably the remains of the early sixteenth century town.
A church of stone and mud, thatched, is to be seen there built among the ruins and walls
of another, ancient, one, the walls of which are still visible and were of stone and mud
too (for in no part of Ethiopia is there any sign or trace that lime has ever at any time
been seen there, or any building, large or small, constructed with it) but very wide apart.
From what is visible, the church seems to have had five aisles. It was 220 spans long and
100 wide, it has a big enclosure wall of stone and mud and inside it a very handsome
courtyard paved with large, well cut stones, ending, on the side the church is, in a flight
of 8 or 9 steps, also made of well cut stones. At the top is a platform of 10 or 12 covados
in the space before the façade and principal door of the church.
Outside this church's enclosure is another in which five or six big pedestals of black
stone are to be seen. Near at hand are four columns of the same stone 10 or 12 spans
high. Among them is a seat on which the Emperors sit to be crowned after first having
taken his seat on the pedestals I mentioned and after various ceremonies have been
performed on them
(see
Ch. 7: 6
for an account of the coronation).
What is most worth seeing here, a display of presumptuous grandeur, is many tall stones
like obelisks, needles and pyramids. They are in a meadow lying behind the church. I
counted some twenty that were standing and seven or eight that have been thrown to the
ground and broken in many fragments. The tallest of those standing, if measured by its
shadow, is 104 spans. Its width at the base is ten spans, it becomes thinner as it goes up,
like a pyramid, but it is not square; it has two sides broader and two narrower than the
other two. It is carved as though in small panels each of which is like a square of two
spans. This is the style of all those which have this carving, which are the taller ones. The
rest are rough and unshaped slabs without any carving at all. The shortest are from 30 to
40 spans; the rest are all taller. It can be seen from the fragments of three or four of
those that have been overthrown, that they were much bigger than the tallest of those now
standing, which I said was a hundred and four spans, and some can be seen to have been
over two hundred. The old men of this country say that a few years ago, in the time of
King Malaac Cegued, and the Viceroy Isaac who rebelled and brought in the Turks to
help him against the Emperor, they overthrew the six or seven that lie on the ground in
fragments.
No one can say what was the object of the former kings who raised them up. It may well
be thought that they were like mausoleums erected near their tombs, since this was the
object of the Egyptians. It was no doubt from them, through their proximity and the
constant communication there was between them, that they learnt about, and that the
workmen came to make, these barbarous and monstrous structures. A bombard shot
away from this spot is a broad stone not much higher than a man on which a long
inscription can be seen. Many Greek and some Latin letters are recognisable, but when
joined together, they do not make words in Greek, Latin, Hebrew, or any other known
language, and so the meaning of the writing is not discoverable.
Balthasar Tellez also added a little to the picture of Aksum in the seventeenth century, in
his book published in Portugal in 1660, and later translated into English (1710); much of
his information repeats de Almeida's.
At this time there is no settled city in all Ethiopia; formerly the town of Aczum was very
famous among the Abyssinians, and still preserves somewhat of its renown; and this
place seems to have been a city, at least they look upon it as most certain, that the Queen
of Sheba kept her court there, and that it was the residence of the emperors for many
ages after, and they are crown'd there to this day . . . this is the city Aczum, or Auxum . . .
at present it is only a village of about 100 houses. There are to be seen many ancient
ruins, particularly those of a spacious church. . . . The most magnificent thing that
appears here, are certain very tall stones, in the nature of obelisks, or pyramids, the
biggest of them 78 foot in length, the breadth at the foot seven foot six inches. It is cut as
it were in small cushions, each of them about half a yard square; the smallest of them
being between 25 and 30 foot high are rude misshapen stones. Some of those which seem
to have been tallest are thrown down, and they say, the Turks entering Ethiopia
overthrew them. The end of erecting them may reasonably suppos'd to have been for
monuments, near their graves; which was the design of the Egyptians in their so famous
pyramids. Here is also a stone set up with a large inscription, in Greek and Latin
characters, but they do not make any sense.
Illustration 20. View of part of the central pavilion at Dungur, showing the granite
corner-blocks, one of the re-entrants, and the rebates in the walls.
4. Aksumite Domestic Architecture
The general style of the élite domestic buildings of Aksum has been described above (
Ch.
5: 2
), and reconstructions have been attempted (in Littmann 1913; and, more modestly,
by Buxton and Matthews 1974). The pavilions in their domestic enclosures are the most
typical examples of the unique
Aksumite form of construction, and embody most of the
characteristics of Aksumite architecture. The podia (the only parts of these buildings
which survive, except in very rare cases) were built according to a style whereby the
walls exhibited no long straight stretches, but instead were indented, so that any long
walls were formed by a series of recesses or re-entrants and salients. These, considering
that the building material was mostly random rubble (coursed stonework is rarely found),
bound only with mud mortar, must have been designed to strengthen walls with low
cohesion inclined to sag, and to deal with expansion and contraction caused by widely-
ranging temperatures. Later structures,
such as the Lalibela churches, show that the
indentations were not used only on the podia, but extended to roof level.