526
Chapter 28
2
Thomas More says in his “Utopia": “Therfore that on covetous and unsatiable cormaraunte and very
plage of his native contrey maye compasse aboute and inclose many thousand
akers of grounde
together within one pale or hedge, the husbandman be thrust owte of their owne, or els either by
coneyne and fraude, or by violent oppression they be put besydes it, or by wrongs and iniuries thei be
so weried that they be compelled to sell all: by one meanes, therfore, or by other, either by hooke or
crooke they muste needes departe awaye, poore, selye, wretched soules, men, women, husbands,
wiues, fatherlesse children, widowes, wofull mothers with their yonge babes, and their whole
household smal in substance, and muche in numbre, as husbandrye requireth many handes. Awaye
thei trudge, I say, owte of their knowen accustomed houses, fyndynge no place to reste in. All their
housholde stuffe, which is very little woorthe, thoughe it might well abide the sale: yet beeynge
sodainely thruste owte, they be constrayned to sell it for a thing of nought. And when they haue
wandered abrode tyll that be spent, what cant they then els doe but steale, and then iustly pardy be
hanged, or els go about beggyng. And yet then also they be caste in prison as vagaboundes, because
they go aboute and worke not: whom no man wyl set a worke though thei neuer so willyngly profre
themselues therto.” Of these poor fugitives of whom Thomas More says that they were forced to
thieve, “7,200 great and petty thieves were put to death,” in the reign of Henry VIII. (Holinshed,
“Description of England,” Vol. 1, p. 186.) In Elizabeth’s time, “rogues were trussed up apace, and that
there was not one year commonly wherein three or four hundred were not devoured and eaten up by
the gallowes.” (Strype’s “Annals of the Reformation and Establishment of Religion and other Various
Occurrences in the Church of England during Queen Elizabeth’s Happy Reign.” Second ed., 1725,
Vol. 2.) According to this same Strype, in Somersetshire, in one year, 40 persons were executed, 35
robbers burnt in the hand, 37 whipped, and 183 discharged as “incorrigible vagabonds.” Nevertheless,
he is of opinion that this large number of prisoners does not comprise even a fifth of the actual
criminals, thanks to the negligence of the justices and the foolish compassion of the people; and the
other counties of England were not better off in this respect than Somersetshire, while some were even
worse.
3
“Whenever the legislature attempts to regulate the differences between masters and their workmen,
its counsellors
are always the masters,” says A. Smith. “L’esprit des lois, c’est la propriété,” says
Linguet.
4
“Sophisms of Free Trade.” By a Barrister. Lond., 1850, p. 206. He adds maliciously: “We were
ready enough to interfere for the employer, can nothing now be done for the employed?”
5
From a clause of Statute 2 James I., c. 6, we see that certain clothmakers took upon themselves to
dictate, in their capacity of justices of the peace, the official tariff of wages in their own shops. In
Germany, especially after the Thirty Years’ War, statutes for keeping down wages were general. “The
want of servants and labourers was very troublesome to the landed proprietors in the depopulated
districts. All villagers were forbidden to let rooms to single men and women; all the latter were to be
reported to the authorities and cast into prison if they were unwilling to become servants, even if they
were employed at any other work, such as sowing seeds for the peasants at a daily wage, or even
buying and selling corn. (Imperial privileges and sanctions for Silesia, I., 25.) For a whole century in
the decrees of the small German potentates a bitter cry goes up again and again about the wicked and
impertinent rabble that will not reconcile itself to its hard lot, will not be content with the legal wage;
the individual landed proprietors are forbidden to pay more than the State had fixed by a tariff. And
yet the conditions of service were at times better after war than 100 years later; the farm servants of
Silesia had, in 1652, meat twice a week, whilst even in our century, districts are known where they
have it only three times a year. Further, wages after the war were higher than in the following
century.” (G. Freytag.)
6
Article I. of this law runs: “L’anéantissement de toute espèce de corporations du même état et
profession étant l’une des bases fondamentales de la constitution
française, il est défendu de les
527
Chapter 28
rétablir de fait sous quelque prétexte et sous quelque forme que ce soit.” Article IV. declares, that if
“des citoyens attachés aux mêmes professions, arts et métiers prenaient des délibérations, faisaient
entre eux des conventions tendantes à refuser de concert ou à n’accorder qu’à un prix déterminé le
secours de leur industrie ou de leurs travaux, les dites délibérations et conventions... seront déclarées
inconstitutionnelles, attentatoires à la liberté et à la declaration des droits de l’homme, &c.;” felony,
therefore, as in the old labour-statutes. [As the abolition of any form of association between citizens of
the same estate and profession is one of the foundations of the French constitution, it is forbidden to
re-establish them under any pretext or in any form, whatever they might be. ... citizens belonging to
the same profession, craft or trade have joint discussions and make joint decisions with the intention
of refusing together to perform their trade or insisting together on providing the services of their trade
or their labours only at a particular price, then the said deliberations and agreements ... shall be
declared unconstitutional, derogatory to liberty and the declaration of the rights of man, etc.]
(“Révolutions de Paris,” Paris, 1791, t. III, p. 523.)
7
Buchez et Roux: “Histoire Parlementaire,” t. x., p. 195.