Case Study Border Midland West Source: Mr. Gerry Finn



Yüklə 0,71 Mb.
tarix15.08.2018
ölçüsü0,71 Mb.
#62567


Case Study Border Midland West

  • Source: Mr. Gerry Finn

  • Director

  • Border, Midland and Western Regional Assembly

  • Ireland

  • March 2004


Project Selection – General Principles

  • Programme and Measure Objectives

  • Economic Impact – taking account of Deadweight and Displacement

  • Financial Viability – PPP and productive Sector Projects

  • Cost effectiveness

  • Environmental Impact

  • Impact on equality of opportunity

  • Impact on poverty

  • Impact on rural development

  • Programme Complement set out specific criteria to be used

  • Greater degree competition especially aid to private sector

  • Source: National Development Plan 2000 – 2006 P. 212

  • (3)



Principal Appraisal Techniques

  • Financial Analysis

  • Cost Benefit Analysis

  • Cost Effectiveness

  • Scoring ; Weighting ; Ranking

  • Multi Criteria Analysis (M.C.A)

  • Cost Benefit – Mandatory for projects €50m +

  • – Recommended for other large infrastructural projects

  • Source: Fitzpatrick Associates: Review of Project Selection

  • Procedures and Appraisal Techniques in the CSF. May 1999

  • (4)



Cost Benefit Analysis

  • Source: Fitzpatrick Associates: Review of Project Selection

  • Procedures and Appraisal Techniques in the CSF May 1999

  • (5)



Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR)

  • The criteria against which projects will be appraised are identified

  • A weighting is assigned to each criteria based on importance (no weighting = equal value)

  • Each project receives numerical score against different criteria

  • Different project applications ranked against each other

  • Source: IPA: Implementation and Administration of E.U.

  • Structural And Cohesion Funds in Ireland –

  • Procedures Manual: P. 65

  • (6)



Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR)



Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR)



Project Selection – Transparency Issues

  • Public Promotion

  • Eligibility Criteria Published

  • Criteria for selection available

  • Weightings for criteria available

  • Decisions made by Committee

  • Conflicts of interest avoided (Declarations)

  • Information given to unsuccessful applicants

  • Competitive or queuing basis

  • Appeals system in place

          • (9)


Project Selection – Selection Criteria

  • Included in Operational Programme Objectives

  • Measure specific objectives

  • Economic Impact

  • Financial Viability

  • Cost-Effectiveness

  • Horizontal Principles: Environment: rural development

  • Poverty: Equality

  • Scoring: Weighting: Ranking

          • (10)


Project Appraisal – County Enetreprise Board Procedure

  • CEB County based structure

  • Legal Entity – Company limited by guarantee

  • Directors – State Sector; Social Partners;

  • Elected Members

  • Independent Evaluation Committee

      • Business Expertise
      • Banking Expertise
      • Private Sector Expertise
      • Other – Technical
      • Source: Roscommon CEB Procedures Manual
      • (11)


Project Appraisal – CEB Procedure

  • Idea

  • Initial contact with County Enterprise Officer

  • Business Plan / Formal Application

  • Site visit to project

  • Appraisal by CEB staff

  • Assessment by Evaluation Committee

  • CEB Board decision

  • Roscommon CEB Procedures Manual

  • (12)



Project Appraisal – CEB Criteria for Assistance

  • You must show:

      • that the project is commercially viable
      • That there is a market for the product or service
      • That adequate finance will be available to fund the project
      • That the promoter has the management and technical capacity to handle the project
      • That the promoters tax affairs are in order and proper company structure
      • (13)


Project Selection - Tourism Procedure

  • Initial call for applications – 2 stage process

  • Assessement of Proposals

      • Initial review by Regional Tourism Organisation
      • Assessment and scoring of proposals by Fáilte Ireland
      • Assessed by Fáilte Ireland Assessment Committee
      • Considered and approved by Product Management Board
  • Shortlisted applications complete detailed proposal form

  • Evaluation by Fáilte Ireland evaluation team

  • Assessment Committee review recommendations

  • Product Management Board consider – approve, defer or reject

    • (14)


Tourism Procedure – Monitoring & Evaluation

  • Monitoring of Programme at three levels

      • Implementing Agency
      • Monitoring Committee level
      • National (NDP/CSF)
  • Grantee must retain all records and have available for inspection

  • Retain records of account for 6 years (Irish Law)

  • Retain records 3 years following closure of programme

  • Grantee must file annual financial statements

  • Grantee may have to provide evidence of satisfactory management and financial control procedures

  • Work must comply to all planning conditions

  • Regular progress reports on work

  • Security – Deed of Covenant or Mortgage

  • Grant paid in two instalments – Interim and Final



Project Financing

  • Public Sector

    • Project provision included in annual budget estimates of Central Government Department
    • EU receipts also included
    • Recouped in arrears by Exchequer following verification of expenditure
  • Private Sector

    • Project Approved in advance of commencement
    • Project payments made in arrears on basis of verified expenditure (stage payments allowed)
    • Balance of funding provided by promoters own resources, borrowings or other equity investment
    • Equity and loan finance also included
    • Note: All public aid must respect State Aid rules
    • (16)


Tendering

  • Quotations and Tenders

    • Up to €800 – Two oral quotations
    • €800 to €8,000 – Two written quotations
    • €8,000 to €16,000 – Three written quotations
    • €16,000 to €32,000 – Four written tenders
    • €32,000 to €160,000 – Full tender in at least two regional newspapers and/or national newspapers
    • €160,000 and over – Advertisement in Official Journal of EU and national newspapers
    • Source: “A guide to Financial Management” – Special EU Programmes Body
    • (17)


Project Management – Role of Implementing Body

  • Design of overall scheme

  • Seek applications by public advertisement

  • Review and approval of project applications received from project promoters

  • Ongoing monitoring of projects

  • Reviewing progress expenditure, final project costs and irregularity reports if applicable

  • Review, approval and payment of project manager payment claims

  • Prepare claims for Managing Authority on to Paying Authority

  • Source: IPA: Implementation and Administration of E.U.

  • Structural And Cohesion Funds in Ireland –

  • Procedures Manual: P. 65 (18)



Project Management – IT Based System

  • Financial Control Systems

  • Financial Tables

  • Physical Indicators

  • Annual Implementation Reports

  • Other Reports by period county, field of intervention

  • Actual expenditure reports

  • Claims for draw down

  • Payment details

  • Report on receipts and outstanding claims

  • Funds allocation, dispersal instructions

  • Source: IPA: Implementation and Administration of E.U.

  • Structural And Cohesion Funds in Ireland –

  • Procedures Manual: P. 52 (19)



Project Reporting to Monitoring Committee

  • Introduction – description measure, commentary on progress

  • Expenditure to date

  • Performance Indicators – progress to targets

  • North/South Co-operation

  • Information and Publicity Requirements

  • Horizontal Issues – Environment; Gender Equality; Poverty; Rural Development

  • Future Prospects

  • Adjustments required

  • Annexes

  • (20)



Value for Money - Definitions

  • Additionality: Measure of economic output i.e. amount of project output compared to what would have occurred without intervention

  • Deadweight: Opposite to additionality i.e. could project have proceeded without State Aid

  • Displacement: Activities that would or could have been financed by the private sector are displaced by publicly subsidised activity

  • Cost-effectiveness: Projects selected contribute the largest amount possible to policy objectives at the minimum possible cost.

  • Source: Fitzpatrick Associates:

  • Review of Project Selection Procedures and Appraisal Techniques in the CSF. May 1999

  • (21)



Contact Details

  • BMW Regional Assembly

  • The Square

  • Ballaghaderreen

  • Co. Roscommon

  • Tel. (353) 094 9862970 Fax. (353) 094 9862973

  • Email: info@bmwassembly.ie

  • Website: www.bmwassembly.ie

  • National Development Plan:

  • Website: www.ndp.ie

  • EU Structural Funds:

  • Website: www.eustructuralfunds.ie



Yüklə 0,71 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə