Contemporary Problems of Social Work Современные проблемы социальной работы academic journal


CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL WORK



Yüklə 4,05 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə6/82
tarix21.03.2018
ölçüsü4,05 Kb.
#32739
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   82

14
CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL WORK
In order for domestic enterprises to move closer to the world standards of socially responsible 
investment had much to do. It should begin with the introduction of the SRI concept and the 
principles of socially responsible investing in a variety of forms, which to some extent will be 
most convenient for organizations. For example:
–  introduction of a special section in the annual reports, as well as developed forms of social, 
environmental, industry reports and sustainability reports;
–  conducting regional social forums, inviting businesses to participate in the major events 
of power, as well as seminars and special events for the development of cross–sectoral social 
partnership involving the main triad relationship “society–business–state”;
–  development and implementation of special purpose programs and socially responsible 
investment in the social, environmental, cultural and sports fields with a direct equity 
participation of organizations in their funding.
It is also necessary to build a regular formal dialogue with the authorities and the public 
about the principles of social responsibility business. This is to ensure that representatives of 
government and civil society themselves, in turn, will formulate and determine their own share 
of social responsibility.
Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation and the Center for the 
development of public–private partnership with the support of the Chamber of Commerce of 
the Russian Federation was carried out large–scale and scientifically based study assessing the 
level of PPP development in Russian regions.
In assessing the level of public–private partnerships development in the Russian regions 
following factors were taken into account:
1.  Development of institutional environment (analysis of the legal framework in the field of 
public–private partnerships at the regional and local levels, as well as an analysis of institutional 
factors – the presence of the authorized body, the number of experts specially trained).
2.  Experience in the public–private partnership projects implementation;
3.  Regional investment attractiveness.
Let us consider the level of regional public–private partnerships development in the 
provision of social services in the Russian Federation (Figure 6).
95 projects in 
the transport 
sphere
203 projects in the social 
sphere
505 projects in the energy 
sphere
482 projects in the 
municipal sphere 
Source: compiled by the author based on [19].
Figure 6.
 Rating of Russian Regions by the Level of PPP Development
Figure 6 shows that there are only 203 projects in the social sector. It is 15,8% of the total 
number of projects implemented in the framework of PPP.
The results of the rating are presented in Table 3.


15
VOLUME 2, No. 1, 2016
Table 3
Russian Regions Rating by the Level of PPP Development
Group
Regions
Regions leading 
in terms of PPP 
(60,0–75,0%).
Cities: St. Petersburg, Tatarstan, Moscow.
Region: Novosibirsk region, Nizhny Novgorod region, Leningrad region.
Regions with a 
high level of PPP 
development 
(45,0–60,0%).
Cities: Perm, Udmurtia.
Region: Samara region, Sverdlovsk region, Moscow region, Voronezh region, Bash-
kortostan Republic, The Ulyanovsk region, Tula region, Yaroslavl region, Krasnodar 
region, Tambov region, Yamalo–Nenets AO, Khanty–Mansiysk region, Rostov region, 
Vladimir region, Komi Republic.
Regions with an 
average level of 
development of 
PPP (35,0–45,0%).
Cities: Murmansk.
Region: Kaluga region, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Orenburg Region, Republic of 
Buryatia, Republic of Chuvashia, Pskov region, Belgorod region, Khabarovsk region
Ryazan region, Amur region, Sakhalin region, Vologda region, Lipetsk region, Pri-
morsky region, Omsk region.
Regions with low 
levels of devel-
opment of PPP 
(25,0–35,0%).
Kemerovo region, Saratov region, Tver region, Tomsk region, Penza region, Irkutsk 
region, Altai region, Ivanovo region, Volgograd region, Republic of Tuva, Arkhan-
gelsk region, Republic of Khakassia, Kirov region, Kaliningrad region, Smolensk 
region, Kursk region, Krasnoyarsk region , Novgorod region, Kamchatka region, Bry-
ansk region, Astrakhan region, Chelyabinsk region, the Jewish autonomous region, 
Republic of Karelia, Mordovia Republic, 
Stavropol region, Kurgan region, Kostroma 
region.
Regions with a 
very low level of 
development of 
PPP (0–25,0%).
Cities: Sevastopol.
Region: Republic of Kabardino–Balkaria, Republic of Mari El, the Nenets Autono-
mous District, Republic of Dagestan, Tyumen region, Altai Republic, Trans–Baikal 
Territory, Republic of North Ossetia–Alania, Republic of Kalmykia, Republic of 
Crimea, Orel region, Magadan Region, Republic of Chechnya, Chukotka Autonomous 
District, Republic of Karachaevo–Cherkessia, Republic of Adygea, Republic of In-
gushetia.
Source: compiled by the author based on [19].
Stavropol region occupies only 63 place in the total rating (25,6%). Compared to the 
2014 year region lost three positions in the overall ranking.
As of March 1, 2015:
–  in 68 regions a law on the participation of the Russian Federation in the public–private 
partnerships was adopted. In 4 regions such a law was developed and is under consideration in 
the legislature;
– regulatory acts establishing procedures for working with projects of public–private 
partnership are in 40 regions;
– one or more municipalities have adopted legal acts regulating the development of 
municipal–private partnership and / or implementation of MPP projects in 21 regions,
–  74 subjects received the investment memoranda, programs and strategies, that mention of 
public–private partnerships as a mechanism to attract investment;
–  18 subjects have PPP development plans and / or implementation of PPP projects in the 
program subject of the Russian Federation;
– 76 regions have created authorities, the functional units and / or collective bodies 
responsible for the development of PPP;
–  in 46 regions there are officials (two or more) which have a special qualification in project 
management of PPP.
Statistics implementation of PPP projects in the social sphere is shown in Figure 7.


Yüklə 4,05 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   82




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə