Contemporary Problems of Social Work Современные проблемы социальной работы academic journal

16
CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL WORK
0
1
22
11
9
24
15
21
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Objects of social services
Facilities education
Health facilities
Lease agreement with investment commitments
Concessionary agreement
PPP Agreement
Source: compiled by the author based on [19].
Figure 7.
 Statistics Implementation of PPP Projects in the Social Sphere
At the beginning of 2016 in the social sphere 203 projects were already implemented. Stages 
of PPP projects implementation are as follows:
1.  Initiating – 60 projects.
2.  Pre–investment stage – 59 projects.
3.  Operational stage – 41 projects.
4.  The investment stage – 33 projects.
5.  Completion – 10 projects.
Best practices of PPP projects implementation in the social sector are presented in Table 4.
Table 4
Best Practices of PPP Projects Implementation in the Social Sphere
Area
Project
The subject of the Rus-
sian Federation
Health
Reconstruction of the building to accommodate a family 
planning and reproduction center.
Republic of Tatarstan
Construction onkoradiologicheskih centers for diagnostic 
detection of cancer.
Moscow region
Establishment of general practitioners and medical stations.
Leningrad and Ulyanovsk 
regions
Education
Construction of 15 kindergartens in the 9 municipalities of 
the Tomsk region.
Tomsk region
Rent land for the construction of pre–school education “ruble 
per square sq. meter”.
Moskow
Source: compiled by the author based on [19].
To summarize, it should be noted that in order to improve the efficiency of the social services 
in the Russian Federation, it is necessary:

---

17
VOLUME 2, No. 1, 2016
1.  To implement the sustainable development concept both at the federal and region levels.
2.  To complete the work on improving the level of information coverage of all economic 
entities and non–profit organizations on the concept of socially responsible investment, 
involving primarily systemically important and socially–oriented lending institutions, 
insurance companies, oil and gas and telecommunications businesses, as well as major airlines 
and representatives of the automotive industry.
3.  To develop a PPP model at the regional and federal levels.
Clearly, some of propositions that we have offered are not entirely unique but in further 
studies it will be presented the model of public–private partnership functioning in the provision 
of social services in the Russian Federation.
References
1.  Andikaeva, K.A. (2015). Scientific-Theoretical Bases of Socially Responsible Investment: 
Essence, History and Views // Social Policy and Sociology. No.4 (111). P. 22–30.
2.  Andryushchenko, G.I., Andikaeva, K.A. (2015). The Economic Foundations of the Concept of 
Social Responsibility in the Service Sector. Social Policy and Sociology. No. 5 (112). P. 15–
25.
3.  Bagmet K. Social Innovative Initiatives of Credit Organizations in the Russian Federation. 
(2015). Social and Economic Innovations: Trends, Forecasts and Perspectives: Conference 
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference. P. 53–55.
4.  Clement-Davies, Christopher (2007) Public-Private Partnerships in central and Eastern Europe: 
structuring concessions agreements. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
5.  Delmon, J. & Mandri–Perrott Cl. (2009). A Practical Guide to Private Participation in 
Infrastructure: Using Government Resources as Effective. PPP Stimulus. World Bank Group. 
Washington, DC 20433.
6.  Delmon, J. & Rigby, V. (2012) International Project Finance and PPP: A Legal Guide to Key 
Growth Markets (3rd edition). Kluwer Law International.
7.  Delmon, J. (2011). Creating a Framework for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Programs. A 
Practical Guide for Decision–makers. World Bank Group. Washington, DC 20433.
8.  Economist Intelligence Unit (2013) Evaluating the Environment for Public–Private 
Partnerships in Latin America and the Caribbean: The 2012 Infrascope: Index Guide and 
Methodology, London.
9.  Eschenfelder, B. (2011). Funder–Initiated Integration Partnership Challenges and Strategies. 
Nonprofit Management and Leadership. No. 21 (3). P. 273–288.
10. European PPP Expertise Centre (2011). The Non–Financial Benefts of PPPs: A Review of 
Concepts and Methodology. Luxembourg.
11.  Filchenkov, V.A. (2007). Features of public-private partnership in the social sphere. Servis 
Plus. No. 3. P. 30–40.
12.  Hoppe, Eva I.; Schmitz, Patrick W. (2013).  Public-Private Partnerships Versus Traditional 
Procurement: Innovation Incentives And Information Gathering.  The RAND Journal of 
Economics. No. 44 (1). P. 56–74.
13.  Iossa, Elisabetta; Martimort, David (2012).  Risk Allocation and the Costs and Benefits of 
Public–Private Partnerships. The RAND Journal of Economics. No. 43 (3). P. 442–474.
14.  Korolyova, A.Y. & Lobanov, P.A. (2015) Public-private partnership in the system of social and 
economic relations of modern Russia, Contemporary Problems of Social Work, Vol. 1. No. 1. 
2015. P. 67–73.
15. Local Government Services and Contracts: Best Practices and Key Issues to Watch. 
JournalistsResource.org, retrieved February 14, 2014.
16.  Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2012) Recommendation of the 
Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public–Private Partnerships, Paris.
17.  PPP in Infrastructure Resource Center. World Bank. Retrieved February 2012.
18. Public-Private Partnerships. Reference Guide. Version 2.0 (2014). International Bank for 
Reconstruction and Development.
19.  Rating Russian Regions in Terms of the Development of Public-Private Partnership 2014–
2015. (2015). Moscow. http://pppcenter.ru/assets/docs/raytingREG-Block_26-03-2015_
web.pdf.

---