represent warmer (Interglacial or Interstadial) conditions. The
dominant tree component in these intervals is Pinus, accompanied
by lower amounts of temperate deciduous trees as oak, elm, lime, and
hornbeam. The low sampling resolution together with the absence of
diagnostically important taxa as Pterocarya or Taxus makes correlation
to the Holsteinian or Eemian interglacial unlikely. The preliminary
palynological database, however, supports the radiometric age for the
Mýtina Maar structure of 288 ± 17 ka (
Mrlina et al., 2007
), relating the
Mýtina sediment record to the Saalian Complex (MIS 10-6,
Litt and
Turner, 1993, Turner, 1998, Vandenberghe, 2000
). Presently known
Saalian deposits of non-glaciated areas in the Czech Republic are
mainly of
fluvial and aeolian origin with some intercalated soil hori-
zons, but their stratigraphic classi
fication often remains unclear (e.g.
Macoun, 1981,
Šibrava, 1986, Dolecki, 1999
). In addition to the strati-
graphic importance, the discovery of a succession of at least three
interstadials/interglacials in superposition from the palaeo-lake at
Mýtina will be an important contribution to the discussion of climatic
gradients in Central Europe and their connection with North Atlantic
ocean currents during interstadial/interglacial periods (e.g.
de Beaulieu
et al., 2001; Müller and Kukla, 2004
) and of vegetation refugia during
cold stadials (e.g.
Willis and van Andel, 2004
).
4.5. Petrochemistry of volcanics and country rock samples
The photographs of typical hand specimen from borehole
(volcanics and country rock) are presented in
Fig. 10
. The petrochem-
ical results are listed in
Table 2
and presented in
Figs. 11, 12
. The
samples in
Fig. 11
(TAS diagram) plot in the
fields of basanite/tephrite.
The critical point is the content of xenolithic olivine, which might
cause the scatter of the diagram. The REE pattern of the volcanics from
the MY-1 borehole agrees with the pattern of nephelinitic host rocks
from the tuff-tephra deposit in the Mýtina trench (
Fig. 11
). Based on
results presented in
Figs. 11 and 12
we can conclude that the volcanics
from the MY-1 borehole and from the tuff-tephra deposit in Mýtina
are almost identical. From a petrochemical point of view both rock
suites should have been generated from the same magma source.
The crustal sample (clast) from MY-1 borehole (
Fig. 10
) can be
classi
fied as phyllite. The crustal xenolith sample XKZH10 from the tuff-
tephra deposit in Mytina shows similar chemical composition (
Table 2
).
4.6. Geomicrobiology
So far, most of the deep biosphere exploration has been carried out
in the marine realm, only few studies investigated deep terrestrial
subsurface environments. The majority of terrestrial studies was
focussed on either hydrocarbon reservoirs (e.g.
L'Haridon et al., 1995
)
or deep aquifers (e.g.
Pedersen and Ekendahl, 1990
). To our knowl-
edge, maar structures have not been investigated microbiologically
previously. Due to their typically
fine-grained, often organic-rich and
laminated sediments they represent an excellent target for geomi-
crobiological investigations of deep lacustrine sediments.
It was shown previously that organic-rich sediment can provide
the feedstock for an abundant microbial community which mainly
resides in the adjacent organic-poorer sediments (
Krumholz et al.,
1997, Parkes, et al., 2005
). Maar sediments provide a similar setting
with changes between organic-rich and -poor sediments: on the
micro-scale there are differences between single laminae, on the
macro scale between sediment sections.
Fig. 11. TAS-diagram (
Le Maitre, 2002
) of nephelinitic host rock samples (MY-1 =
samples from borehole MY-1; Mý and XKZH = samples from Mýtina trench according
to
Geissler, 2005, Geissler et al., 2007
).
Fig. 12. Chondrite-normalized REE-distribution patterns of the nephelinitic host rock
samples (MÝ-1 = samples from borehole MY-1; samples Mý and XKZH = samples from
Mýtina trench according to
Geissler, 2005, Geissler et al., 2007
).
Fig. 13. Abundance of microbial cells in the sediment and the drill
fluid, enumerated by
fluorescence microscopy.
109
J. Mrlina et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 182 (2009) 97
–112
The goal of this pilot study was to obtain a
first overview about the
microbial abundance and distribution in a maar sediments and to see
whether there are any relationships between the geologic environ-
ment and the microbial community.
The abundance and distribution of microbial cells exhibit a typical
trend, starting at values around 10
8
cells cm
− 3
at the surface and
gently decrease with depth to around 10
7
cells cm
-3
at the bottom of
the hole (
Fig. 13
). Cell abundances in the drill
fluid are uniformly
around 3 ± 1 x 10
6
cells cm
− 3
, about an order of magnitude lower than
in the centre of the core. Samples from 10.4 m exhibit a visible change
in sediment composition of silty clay and the intercalated dm-sized
organic-rich layer (for sediment type see
Fig. 7
B). This compositional
change is also re
flected in cell abundance, showing higher values
above the intercalation (3 x 10
8
cells cm
− 3
) and lower values inside
(1 x 10
7
cells cm
− 3
).
A similar trend can be seen between 50 and 60 m, where two thin
horizons of organic laminated sediment intercalate silty clays (for
sediment type see
Fig. 7
F). Around these two layers cell abundances
are elevated (7 x 10
7
cells cm
− 3
) whereas above and below values are
around 1.6 x 10
7
cells cm
− 3
.
5. Conclusions and implications
The initial hypothesis of a hitherto unknown volcano as a source of
volcaniclastic sediments (tuff, tephra) investigated in an exploratory
trench in Mýtina by
Geissler et al. (2004)
became realistic after the
geophysical survey by
Mrlina et al. (2007)
revealed remarkable
gravity and magnetic anomalies. The detailed follow-up gravity,
magnetic and electromagnetic surveying supported the hypothesis
of a maar-diatreme structure in the morphological depression near
Mýtina, about 700 m from the Quaternary
Železná hůrka volcano. The
impressive isometric gravity low of
−2.3 mGal (
Fig. 4
b) is comparable
with anomalies observed in Saxony, Germany (e.g.
Gabriel, 2003;
Kroner et al., 2006; Lindner et al., 2006
), but also e.g. in New Zealand
(
Cassidy et al., 2007
). The former tentative (
Mrlina et al., 2007
) as well
as the upgraded 3D gravity and magnetic model (
Fig. 5
)
fit well with
the style of maar-diatreme structures composition investigated in
other regions and summarized by
Lorenz (2007)
and
Lorenz and
Kurszlaukis (2007)
. The composition consists of a diatreme
fill of low
density (country rock breccia with volcanic products such as bombs,
lapilli and ash) covered by younger sediments of the maar lake (clay,
sand, gravel), and is also characterized by low density (
Figs. 6, 7, 10
).
The magnetic map shows a positive anomaly in the depression,
indicating the presence of volcanic rocks, possibly caused by a scoria
cone at the base of the maar crater or a later-stage intrusion into the
maar
filling (
Fig. 4
c).
The shape of the anomaly indicates such volcanic rocks at depth,
not straight at the surface, which is in agreement with the non-
magnetic maar lake sedimentary cover of the diatreme.
As the survey was extended beyond the limits of the depression,
we also observed very sharp magnetic anomalies that most likely
indicate surface deposits of volcanic products as part of the tephra rim
around the maar. The presence of sediments and volcaniclastics close
to the surface was also proven by increased electrical conductivity
(
Fig. 4
d). In order to provide a complete image of the character and
extent of the rim and volcaniclastic deposits, further magnetic survey
is needed in the larger surroundings of the discovered maar structure,
as well as between the maar and the nearby
Železná hůrka volcano to
disclose the relation of the two structures.
The above discussed results, concentrated in
Fig. 14
, show that the
applied geophysical techniques represent a very ef
ficient tool for
detection of unknown and hidden volcanic structures, like the Mýtina
maar. Mapping of geophysical anomalies allowed the positioning of the
exploratory drilling of the MY-1 borehole near the centre of the gravity
anomaly. The recovered core consists of maar lake sediments down to
84 m depth (
Figs. 6
–8
). The recovery of a long lacustrine sediment
Fig. 14. Maar features: 1 and 2
— approximate contour and centre of maar-diatreme volcano from gravity; 3 and 4 — deeper (volcanic breccia inside the diatreme) and shallow
(erupted) magnetic rocks accumulations; 5
— relicts of tephra rim outside the crater; 6 — morphological edge of the crater; 7 — borehole.
110
J. Mrlina et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 182 (2009) 97
–112