162
Vignato. Qizil: an Interpretation of District Six, Caves 109-121 in Gunei
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale, 52, 2016, pp. 145-172
ISSN 2385-3042
sumed that the first flight of steps cut perpendicular into the facade, this
was then followed by a landing and then another flight of steps parallel to
the cliff façade. In this respect the internal stairway was much similar to
other structures of the same type; what is unusual is the presence of large
square postholes carved at a regular distance on the cliff, just below the
level of the steps, as if to support a string-board. Their presence suggests
that the internal stairway collapsed and was restored by carving postholes
and inserting beams into them, while the opposite end was supported by a
wooden structure. Once the springboards were secured, the wooden steps
could be installed (Fig. 3). Following the collapse of the original internal
stairway, the caves in such a high position on the cliff were kept in use by
constructing an outer timber stairway, which rested against the cliff, as a
replacement of the earlier stone carved one.
All of the internal stairways in District Six underwent repairs, although
they were not as dramatic as those described in the case of the stairway
leading to Caves 120-121. The soft mudstone of the steps evidently wore
down easily and required regular up-keep. Small peg-holes were carved
into the inner and out walls of the stairway on a line with the outer lip of
each step. Rods were then inserted into these holes and a layer of gesso
was then poured over the tread. The gesso is now lost, but these small
peg holes present in all the internal stairways indicate that regular main-
tenance was taking place.
Before leaving this topic, the sheer amount of rock which had to be re-
moved in order to build an internal stairway needs to be considered. The
volume of stone which need to be excavated was in some instances supe-
rior to that of the caves it served. The internal stairways required a great
amount of labour. Extra labour would also have been required carve caves
in the upper reaches of the cliff, I have suggested – relying also in a large
set of other data – the following general rule for Qizil: the lower reaches
and best part of the cliffs in Qizil were exploited first, while the upper
sections of the cliffs – which required large amounts of extra work – were
only used after the more convenient sections were fully used up.
2.2 Repair and Renovation of Damaged Caves
All the caves have suffered a great deal of damage. A quick look at the cliffs
where the caves were carved leaves no doubt about the degree of dete-
rioration suffered since the monastic period when the site was occupied.
Larger or smaller collapses appear to have occurred throughout the period
of occupation. Work would have been required following these collapses
in order to keep the caves in use. In District Six repairs and renovations
are so numerous that almost the whole range of restoration techniques
employed in Kuča can be observed here. Caves of one type were often
ISSN 2385-3042
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale, 52, 2016, pp. 145-172
Vignato. Qizil: an Interpretation of District Six, Caves 109-121 in Gunei
163
transformed into other types of caves or caves that were added to preexist-
ing groups. Partly collapsed rock-carved antechambers were repaired by
installing cantilevered timber structures. In terms of internal structures
architectural elements within a cave could be modified by chiselling away
or adding material; new plaster or successive coats of whitewash could
also be applied. In the case of decorated caves they were often partially
or completely repainted. The fact that the caves in District Six underwent
heavy restoration demonstrates that the development of this district was
not a straightforward process and what we see today is the result of a
prolonged period of cave construction and restoration. The importance of
making a precise distinction among elements of different periods present
in a cave and the need to assign them to the period they belong to before
undertaking any kind of specific studies of a cave cannot be over stated.
Without this basic work, elements belonging to different periods are looked
upon as contemporary which in turn undermines the research.
Caves 110-111A being well preserved provides the clearest case study.
As previously mentioned it was reached through an internal stairway and
had a rock carved antechamber which was shared by all of the three
caves that formed the group. A reconstruction of the doorway, its frame
and of the internal stairway clearly indicates that the whole antechamber
was completely carved out of the rock. We might safely assume that light
entered through one or more windows carved in the front wall as in the
case of the Five Joined Caves (68-72) in Qumtura, a clear example of such
a solution.
After their construction, the caves were used until the exterior section
of the cliff collapsed, causing great damage to the front part of the ante-
chamber and exposing the stairway; at that point the three caves could
no longer be safely used. A large repair was then undertaken with the aim
of replacing the collapsed section of the rock carved antechamber with a
cantilevered timber structure. Thirteen grooves were carved across the
remaining sections of the floor. Robust joists were then inserted into the
beams projecting outwards (presently circa 90 cm long in front of Cave 110
and circa 170 cm in front of Cave 111). Smaller holes carved just below
the ceiling on the main wall held rafters (12 postholes in front of Cave 110
and 7 in front of Cave 111). Once joists and rafters were in place and con-
nected by verticals posts, they formed a solid timber structure imbedded
into the rock, which was further stabilized by wooden planks fastened onto
joists to form the floor, while railings inserted between the vertical posts
ensured safety. A roof protected from the elements as well as from the
inevitable falling rocks. The exposed stairway was considered sufficiently
safe, in spite of the missing outer wall, and so was not restored. Indeed,
it remained in use until a decade ago (Fig. 9).
Similar repairs of collapsed antechambers are numerous and show that
it was a common practice to bring damaged caves back into use. For ex-