Düzey derslikleri: İLKÖĞretiM 7 – sinif öĞrencileri Üzerine bir durum çalişmasi Serap yilmaz



Yüklə 144,62 Kb.
səhifə3/3
tarix20.09.2017
ölçüsü144,62 Kb.
1   2   3

KAYNAKÇA

Akbaba, A. (1996). “İlköğretim Kurumlarında Seviye Sınıfları ve Uygulama”. Çağdaş Eğitim. Yıl.21, No.226, 36–38.

Aldan-Karademir. Ç. (2007). “Düzey Dersliklerinin İlköğretim Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilgisi Dersine İlişkin Akademik Başarıları ve Benlik Saygıları Üzerine Etkisi”. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi: Aydın.

Alexander, K.L.; Cook, M.; Mcdill, E.L. (1978). “Curriculum Tracking and Educational Stratification: Some Further Evidence”, American Sociological Review. 43 (February), 47-66.

Başaran, E.İ. (1974). Eğitim Psikolojisi: Modern Eğitimin Psikolojik Temelleri. Ankara: Yargıçoğlu Matbaası.

Betts, J. R.; Shkolnik, J. L. (2000a). “The Effects of Ability Grouping on StudentAchievement and Resource Allocation in Secondary Schools”. Economics of Education Review. 19, 1-15

Betts, J. R.; Shkolnik, J. L. (2000b). “Key Difficulties in Identifying the Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement”. Economics of Education Review. 19, 21-26

Boaler, J.; Wiliam, D; Brown, M. (2000). “Students’ Experiences of Ability Grouping-Disaffection, Polarization and the Construction of Failure”. British Educational Research Journal. 26 (5). 631-648.

Boerger, C. J. (2006). Will Ability Grouping the Seventh Grade Students in Math Positively Impact Their BST Scores When They Take the Test in Eight Grade? Unpublished Master Thesis, Winona State Universty Graduate Education Learning Community Rochester, Minesota 2005-2006. Volume I, pg.87

Braddock, J.H.; Dawkins, M.P. (1993). "Ability Grouping, Aspirations, and Attainments: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988". Journal of Negro Education. 62(3), 324-336.

Campoy, R. (2005). Case Study Analysis in the Classroom: Becoming A Reflective Teacher, Sage Publications.

Carborano, W. (2005). “Tracking, Students’ Effort and Academic Achievement”. Sociology of Education. 78 (1), 27-49.

Cash, K. (1991). “Perceptions of Selected Upper Elementary Public School Teachers Toward Grouping and Evaluation of Pupil Learning Progress in Reading”, Dissertation Abstracts International. 52(6), 2000-A.

Cheung C. K.; Rudowicz, E. (2003). “Academic Outcomes of Ability Grouping Junior High School Students in Hong Kong”. The Journal of Educational Research. 96 (4), 241-254.

De Grow, G.S. (1964). “A Study of The Effects of The Use of Vertical Reading Ability Groupings for Reading Classes As Compared With Heterogeneous Groupings in Grades Four, Five, and Six in The Port Huron Area Public Schools of Michigan Over a Three Year Period”, Dissertation Abstracts International. 24(8), 3166-3167.

Figlio, D. N., Page, m. E. (2002). “School Choice and the Distributional Effects of Ability Tracking: Does Separation Increase Inequality?”. Journal of Urban Economics. 51, pg. 497-514.

Gömleksiz, M. (1997). Düzey Kümeleri: Temeleğitim 2. Aşama Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Adana. Baki Kitabevi.

Hallinan, M., Kubitschek, W. N. (1999). “Curriculum Differentiation and High School Achievement”, Social Psychology of Education. Vol. 3, 41-62.

Harrison, A.E. (1989). “Ability Grouping: Practises and Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers”. Dissertation Abstracts International. 50(5), 1199-A.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings, State University of New York Press.

Hollifield, J. (1987). “Ability Grouping in Elemantary Schools” www.eric.ed.gov, ED290542 1987-00-00

Holmes C. T., Ahr, T. J. (1994). “Effects of Ability Grouping on Achievement and Self-Concept of African-American and White Students”. The Clearing House, Academic Research Library, 67 (5), 294-297.

Irenson J., Maclntyre H. (2002). “With-in Class Ability Grouping: Placement of Pupils in Groups and Self-Concept”. British Educational Research Journal. Vol. 28, 249-263.

Karabacak , K. (2001). İlköğretimde Seviye Gruplaması, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Sakarya

Kulik J.A.; Kulik, C.-L.C. (1992). “Meta-Analytic Findings on Grouping Programs”. Gifted Child Quarterly. 36(2), 73-77.

Loveless, T. (1998). “The Tracking and Ability Grouping Debate”. Thomas Fordham Foundation.

Mills, T.R. (1993) "The Effects of Grouping in Rural Elementary Schools." Dissertation Abstracts International. 54(4), 1181-A.

Nevi, C. (1991). In Defence of Tracking." Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues. J.Wm. Noll (editör). Connecticut: The Dushkin Publishing Group, s.286-289.

Oakes, J. (1995). "Two Cities' Tracking and Within School Segregation". Teachers College Record. 96(4), 681-690.

Oakes, J.; Guiton, G. (1995). “Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking Decisions”, American Educational Research Journal. 32(1), 3-34.

Saleh, M. Lazonder, A. W., Jong, T. D. (2005). “Effects of With-in Class Ability Grouping on Social Interaction, Achievement and Motivation”. Instructional Science, 33, pg. 105-119.

Stake, R.E. (2000). “Case studies”, Handbook of Qualitative Research, (Ed. Denzin ve Lincoln) 2. basım, Sage Publications.

Slavin, R. E. (1990). “Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis”. Review of Educational Research, 60 (3), 471-499.

Slavin, R.E. (1993). "Ability grouping in the Middle Grades: Achievement Effects and Alternatives" The Elementary School Journal. 60(3), 471-499. 89(5), 535-552.

Tazebay, A., Çelenk, S., Tertemiz, N., Kalaycı, N. (2000) İlköğretim Programları ve Gelişmeler: Program Geliştirme İlke ve Teknikleri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

VanderHart, G. P. (2006). “Why Do Some Schools Group by Ability? Some Evidence From the NAEP”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 65 (2), 435-462.

Wheelock, A. (1992). Cross the tracks: How ‘untracking’ can save America’s schools. http://www.middleweb.com/Whlcktrack.html, erişim: 08.05.2008

Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.



Zimmer, R. (2003). “A New Twist in the Educational Tracking Debate”. Economics of Educational Review. 22, pg. 307-315.

 Bu çalışma, 17. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi’nde sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.




Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2019
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə