Elic r&D and Realization Plan



Yüklə 445 b.
tarix04.02.2018
ölçüsü445 b.
#24470


  • ELIC R&D

  • and

  • Realization Plan


ELIC Study Group & Collaborators

  • A. Afanasev, A. Bogacz, P. Brindza, A. Bruell, L. Cardman, Y. Chao, S. Chattopadhyay,E. Chudakov, P. Degtiarenko, J. Delayen, Ya. Derbenev, R. Ent, P. Evtushenko, A. Freyberger, D. Gaskell, J. Grames, A. Hutton, R. Kazimi, G. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, J. Musson, M. Poelker, R. Rimmer, A. Thomas, H. Wang, C. Weiss, B. Wojtsekhowski, B. Yunn, Y. Zhang - Jefferson Laboratory

  • W. Fischer, C. Montag - Brookhaven National Laboratory

  • V. Danilov - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • V. Dudnikov - Brookhaven Technology Group

  • P. Ostroumov - Argonne National Laboratory

  • V. Derenchuk - Indiana University Cyclotron Facility

  • A. Belov - Institute of Nuclear Research, Moscow-Troitsk, Russia

  • V. Shemelin - Cornell University



Outline

  • ELIC Design Specifications

  • ELIC Overview and Design Parameters

  • R&D Required for ELIC

  • R&D relevant to ERL-based EIC designs

  • EIC Accelerator Pre-R&D Plan

  • ELIC Realization Plan

  • Summary



ELIC Accelerator Design Specifications

  • Center-of-mass energy between 20 GeV and 90 GeV

  • with energy asymmetry of ~10, which yields

  • Ee ~ 3 GeV on EA ~ 30 GeV up to Ee ~ 9 GeV on EA ~ 225 GeV

  • Average Luminosity from 1033 to 1035 cm-2 sec-1 per Interaction Point

  • Ion species:

      • Polarized H, D, 3He, possibly Li
      • Ions up to A = 208
  • Longitudinal polarization of both beams in the interaction region (+Transverse polarization of ions +Spin-flip of both beams)

  • all polarizations >70% desirable

  • Positron Beam desirable



ELIC Layout



Design Features of ELIC

  • Directly aimed at addressing the science program:

  • “Figure-8” ion and lepton storage rings to ensure spin preservation and ease of spin manipulation. No spin sensitivity to energy for all species.

  • Short ion bunches, low β*, and high rep rate (crab crossing) to reach unprecedented luminosity.

  • Four interaction regions for high productivity.

  • Physics experiments with polarized positron beam are possible. Possibilities for e-e-colliding beams.

  • Present JLab DC polarized electron gun meets beam current requirements for filling the storage ring.

  • The 12 GeV CEBAF accelerator can serve as an injector to the electron ring. RF power upgrade might be required later depending on the performance of ring.

  • Collider operation appears compatible with simultaneous 12 GeV CEBAF operation for fixed target program.



Achieving the Luminosity of ELIC



ELIC e/p Parameters



ELIC e/p yielding L=1.6x1033 cm-2 s-1



ELIC Luminosity for Ions



Design Evolution & Recent Developments

  • ELIC design evolves

  • - in response to Science requirements (e.g. Rutgers mtg.)

  • - towards a more robust and reliable concept which relies increasingly on

  • proven state-of-the-art technology.

  • Recent developments include:

  • - Higher center-of-mass energy and inclusion of heavy ions, up to Pb

  • - Concept of SRF ion linac for all ions (ANL design)

  • - The use of stochastic cooling to accumulate intense ion beam

  • - Reducing crab cavity voltage requirement by decreasing crossing angle from 100 mrad to 50 mrad and in combination with a new Lambertson-type final focus quadrupole

  • - Longer [ 3 m] element-free region around the IP’s



SRF Ion Linac Concept



SRF Ion Linac Concept (cont’d)



A “Lambertson” Quad for Ion Final Focus





Accelerator R&D Required for ELIC

  • To achieve luminosity at ~ 1033 cm-2 sec-1

    • High energy electron cooling with circulator ring
  • To achieve luminosity at ~ 1035 cm-2 sec-1

    • Crab crossing
    • Stability of intense ion beams
    • Beam-beam interactions
    • High RF frequency is included in EIC detector R&D


High Energy Electron Cooling

  • Issue:

    • Electron beam cooling required to suppress IBS, reduce beam emittances, provide short ion bunches.
    • Very effective for heavy ions (higher cooling rate), more difficult for protons.
    • Very ambitious project.
  • State of art:

  • Fermilab recently demonstrated relativistic electron cooling.

  • Main Parameters:

  • 4.34 MeV electron beam [x20 previous experience], 0.5 A DC

  • Magnetic field in the cooling section - 100 G

  • Feasibility of electron cooling with bunched beams remains to be demonstrated.

  • R&D Plan



Electron Cooling for ELIC

  • ERL-based cooler - Unique in its use of circulator cooler ring with ~100 revolutions to ease electron source and ERL requirements

  • Dynamics must be simulated and understood



Crab Crossing

    • ELIC crossing angle of 2 x 25 mrad requires total voltage of deflecting field on axis of:
    • 2 MV for electrons – within state of art
    • 40 MV for ions - Integrated magnetic field on axis of 300 G over 4 m
  • Issues:

    • Gradient limits of crab cavity technology need to be understood
    • Phase and amplitude stability requirements
    • Beam dynamics with crab crossing


Crab Crossing (cont’d)

  • State-of-art:

  • KEKB requirements:

  • Crossing angle = 2 x 11 mrad

  • Vkick=1.4 MV, Esp= 21 MV/m



Crab Crossing (cont’d)

  • State-of-art (cont’d):

  • JLab and Cornell estimates of KEKB crab cavity geometry yield:

  • >300 G deflecting field on axis,

  • 180 G for multicell cavity, higher (up to 2x) with shape optimization.

  • R&D Plan:

    • Explore designs with further reduced crossing angle (on-going!)
    • Crab cavity shape optimizations and multicell cavity designs to increase gradient and packing factor, capable for high current operation.
    • Understand phase and amplitude stability requirements
    • Simulate beam dynamics with crab crossing


Stability of Intense Ion Beams

  • Issue: Ion space charge at stacking in pre-booster

  • R&D Plan:

    • - Explore circular painting technique - similar to SNS – via numerical studies and experimental verification.
  • An alternate approach:

  • We are pursuing the use of stochastic cooling of coasting beam in the collider ring at injection energy as an alternate approach to overcome ion space charge limitations.

    • – System design is required but parameters are within state of art


Beam-beam interactions

  • Issues:

  • Beam-beam interaction with multiple IP’s and crab crossing

  • Beam-beam stability in linac-ring colliders

  • R&D Plan:

  • Analysis and simulations.





High current polarized electron source

  • Issue:

  • ERL-based designs require 100’s mA average electron current from a source at 80% polarization.

  • State of art:

  • Present state of art in polarized electron sources 0.3 mA average current, expected to reach 1 mA shortly, operating with current densities of ~ 50 mA/cm2.

  • On-going and Planned R&D:

  • Development of large cathode guns to provide path to electron currents of 10-100’s mA.

    • Build and commission load locked gun (work in progress)
    • Extend operating lifetime using large spot size (work in progress)
    • Improve longitudinal emittance at high bunch charge
    • Scale to voltage > 300kV, for high bunch charge operation
    • Implement laser pulse shaping techniques for emittance preservation
    • Boost fiber-based laser power > 20 W (factor of 10 improvement)
    • Vacuum research for improved operating lifetime at high current


Multipass Energy Recovery

  • Issue:

  • eRHIC Energy Recovery Linac requires 10 passes – 5 up/5 down at 260 mA/pass

  • State of art:

  • SRF ERL: 2x10 mA at the JLab FEL

  • R&D Plan:

    • Explore/Demonstrate feasibility, operational
    • robustness of multipass energy recovery at GeV level in
    • CEBAF.


EIC Accelerator Pre-R&D Plan

  • High current polarized electron source

  • - Total labor: 15 FTE – years

  • - Duration: 5 years

  • - M&S: $800K

  • [5 FTEs & $200 K consist on-going effort]

  • Electron cooling simulations with circulator ring and kicker development

  • - Total labor: 5.5 FTE – years

  • - Duration: 5 years

  • - M&S: $50K for kicker

  • Prototype two 1500 MHz crab cavities and controls

  • - Total Labor: 2 FTE – years

  • - Duration: 2 years

  • - M&S: $450K



EIC Accelerator Pre-R&D Plan (cont’d)

  • Intense ion beam stability – simulations and experiment

    • - Total labor: 2 FTE – years
    • - Duration: 2 years
    • - M&S: $500K for diagnostics development
  • Beam-beam simulations for linac-ring and ring-ring options

  • - Total labor: 3 FTE-years

  • - Duration: 3 years

  • Multipass energy recovery experiment at CEBAF

  • - Total labor: 1 FTE-year

  • - M&S: $600K



Updated ELIC ZDR



ELIC Performance Summary



ELIC Realization Plan



Summary

  • ELIC, JLab’s EIC design, is based on a ring-ring configuration, uses CEBAF as a full energy electron injector, and can be integrated with the 12 GeV fixed target program for physics.

  • ELIC has recently been extended to include heavy ions, and center-of-mass energy between 20 and 90 GeV and promises luminosity up to nearly 1035 cm-2 sec-1 for electron-proton collisions, and at or above 1035 cm-2 sec-1 (per nucleon) for electron-ion collisions.

  • ELIC can reach luminosity at Lp = 1.6 x 1033 cm-2s-1 with state-of-the-art technology, except for electron cooling.

  • Luminosity at Lp~1035 cm-2s-1 requires additional accelerator R&D on crab cavities and design.

  • A pre-R&D plan to address EIC accelerator physics and technology issues has been developed.



Yüklə 445 b.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə