Examine the ethical dilemma



Yüklə 25,23 Kb.
tarix08.12.2017
ölçüsü25,23 Kb.
#14709

Ethics Case Analysis Rubric*

Name _______________________________________ Course: _________________________________ Date: _______________



Total Score: _______________



Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Inadequate
1

Developing Competence
2

Competent
3

Advanced
4

Identifies the ethical dilemma


Does not identify the dilemma and does not ascertain exactly what must be decided

Identifies the dilemma or ascertains exactly what must be decided


Identifies the dilemma (including pertinent facts) and ascertains exactly what must be decided

Describes the dilemma in detail evidencing the gathering of pertinent facts and information and ascertains exactly what must be decided

Identifies the stakeholders

Does not determine who should be involved in the decision making process for this case and does not identify the interested stakeholders

Determines who should be involved in the decision making process for this case or identifies some of the interested stakeholders

Determines who should be involved in the decision making process for this case and accurately identifies all of the interested stakeholders evidencing the learner began to reflect on the viewpoints of these key players as well as their value systems and discussed what each of these stakeholders would like the learner to decide as a plan of action


Determines who should be involved in the decision making process for this case and accurately identifies all of the interested stakeholders evidencing the learner thoroughly reflected on the viewpoints of these key players as well as their value systems and thought through what each of these stakeholders would like the learner to decide as a plan of action

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Inadequate
1

Developing Competence
2

Competent
3

Advanced
4

Identifies Alternatives

Does not delineate any alternatives

Does not clarify consequences




Delineates 1 alternative
Clarifies one alternative and predicts the associated consequences in detail



Delineates 2 alternatives
Clarifies at least one alternative and predicts the associated consequences in detail

Delineates more than 2 possible alternatives

Clarifies all identified alternatives and predicts their associated consequences in detail



Compares and evaluates the ethical arguments

Does not give evidence that the learner reflected on any of the alternatives
Does not rate the ethical reasoning and arguments for each alternative
Does not refer to their professional codes of ethical conduct.

Begins to appraise the relevant facts and assumptions
Rates the ethical reasoning and arguments for some of the alternatives
Provides evidence that the learner began to reflect on the alternatives
Begins to refer to their professional codes of ethical conduct.

Appraises the relevant facts and assumptions; noting the evaluation of any ambiguous information
Rates the ethical reasoning and arguments for most of the alternatives.
Provides evidence of systematic reflection on the alternatives through evaluating each alternative’s impact on key players.
Refers to their professional codes of ethical conduct

Appraises relevant facts and assumptions; noting the evaluation of any ambiguous information and explores any unjustifiable factual or illogical assumptions, or debatable conceptual issues
Rates the ethical reasoning and arguments for all of the alternatives
Provides evidence of systematic reflection on the alternatives through evaluating each alternative’s impact on key players and determines which alternative will provide the greatest good or least amount of harm.
Refers to their professional codes of ethical conduct and determines if it supports their reasoning



Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Inadequate
1

Developing Competence
2

Competent
3

Advanced
4

Chooses a recommended

alternative





Does not make a decision about the best alternative available

Determines the best alternative available

Determines the best alternative available and describes how their decision maximizes the benefit and minimizes the risk for everyone involved

Determines the best alternative available, describes how their decision maximizes the benefit and minimizes the risk for everyone involved, and they challenge their decision as they think others might, and defend it by from the ethical arguments they predict others would use

Formulates an implementation plan

Does not formulate an implementation plan


Begins to formulate an implementation plan

Formulates an implementation plan that delineates the execution of the decision

Formulates an implementation plan that delineates the execution of the decision and evidences a design that will maximize the benefits and minimize the risks while taking into account all of the resources necessary for implementation including personnel and money

Problem

Solving, decision-making, and critical thinking skills




Does not problem solve or use critical thinking skills
Has difficulty making decisions


Evidences the beginning of problem solving and critical thinking
Is able to make minor decisions.

Uses problem solving and critical thinking skills during case analysis
Is able to make major decisions

Uses problem solving and critical thinking skills throughout the entire case analysis
Is able to make major decisions with rationale

Adapted from http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/d/x/dxm12/n458/sample_case_rubric.htm



*Based on the Ethical Model for Ethical Decision Making developed and owned by Educational Advancement Associates.
Yüklə 25,23 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə