TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
9
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
It is therefore necessary to include kinetic considerations
in an evaluation of
the scaling potential. Normally, the field operator does not have control over all
the variables that determine scale deposition,
particularly the water
composition, but the application of thermodynamic and kinetic models could
help identify some production parameters
that could be controlled
(Zhang,2001).
Software prediction packages are commercially available which can allow us
to carry out calculations to answer the following questions (that are of
increasing difficulty):
•
Will there in fact be a scale problem in the field?
(Answer: yes/no?).
•
What will be the “severity” of this problem?
(Answer: “insignificant”, “mild”, “moderate”, “quite severe”, “very
severe” – these terms will be defined later).
•
Is it possible to calculate the severity of the problem quantitatively?
(Answer: the amount of scale in mg/l for
various brine mixing ratios,
and the corresponding supersaturations).
Simple prediction methods include:
A. The Stiff-Davis method used to predict the formation of calcite.
B. The Skillman-McDonald-Stiff method used to predict the formation of
gypsum and barite.
C. The Oddo and Tomson
method is a more complex, but also a more
accurate way of predicting formation of all the common oilfield scales.
The basis of each of these methods is discussed in the following paragraphs,
starting with the prediction of calcite formation:
Dostları ilə paylaş: