Syria. The seventh
book is an expansion of the Didache of the Twelve Apostles. The eighth book
contains a liturgy, and, in an appendix, the apostolical canons. The collection of the three parts into
one whole may be the work of the compiler of the eighth book. It is no doubt of Eastern authorship,
for the church of Rome nowhere occupies a position of priority or supremacy.
265
65
The design was,
to set forth the ecclesiastical life for laity and clergy, and to establish the episcopal theocracy. These
constitutions were more used and consulted in the East than any work of the fathers, and were taken
as the rule in matters of discipline, like the Holy Scriptures in matters of doctrine. Still the collection,
as such, did not rise to formal legal authority, and the second Trullan council of 692 (known as
quinisextum), rejected it for its heretical interpolations, while the same council acknowledged the
Apostolical Canons.
266
66
The "Apostolical Canons" consist of brief church rules or prescriptions, in some copies
eighty-five in number, in others fifty, and pretend to be of apostolic origin, being drawn up by
Clement of Rome from the directions of the apostles, who in several places speak in the first person.
They are incorporated in the "Constitutions" as an appendix to the eighth book, but are found also
by themselves, in Greek, Syriac, Aethiopic, and Arabic manuscripts. Their contents are borrowed
partly from the Scriptures, especially the Pastoral Epistles, partly from tradition, and partly from
the decrees of early councils at Antioch, Neo-Caesarea, Nicaea, Laodicea, &c. (but probably not
Chalcedon, 451). They are, therefore, evidently of gradual growth, and were collected either after
the middle of the fourth century,
267
67
or not till the latter part of the fifth,
268
68
by some unknown
hand, probably also in Syria. They are designed to furnish a complete system of discipline for the
clergy. Of the laity they say scarcely a word. The eighty-fifth and last canon settles the canon of
the Scripture, but reckons among the New Testament books two epistles of Clement and the genuine
books of the pseudo-Apostolic Constitutions.
The Greek church, at the Trullan council of 692, adopted the whole collection of eighty-five
canons as authentic and binding, and John of Damascus placed it even on a parallel with the epistles
of the apostle Paul, thus showing that he had no sense of the infinite superiority of the inspired
writings. The Latin church rejected it at first, but subsequently decided for the smaller collection
of fifty canons, which Dionysus Exiguus about the year 500 translated from a Greek manuscript.
§ 57. Church Discipline.
265
Harnack (l.c. 266-268) identifies Pseudo-Clement with Pseudo-Ignatius and assigns him to the middle of the fourth century.
266
Turrianus Bovius; and the eccentric Whiston regarded these pseudoapostolic Constitutions as
a genuine work of the apostles;
containing Christ’s teaching during the forty days between the Resurrection and Ascension. But Baronius, Bellarmin, and Petavius
attached little weight to them, and the Protestant scholars, Daillé and Blondel, attacked and overthrew their genuineness and
authority. The work is a gradual growth, with many repetitions, interpolations, and contradictions and anachronisms. James,
who was beheaded (a.d. 44), is made to sit in council with Paul (VI. 14), but elsewhere is represented as dead (V. 7). The apostles
condemn post-apostolic heresies and heretics (VI. 8), and appoint days of commemoration of their death (VIII. 33). Episcopacy
is extravagantly extolled. P. de Lagarde says: (Rel juris Eccles. ant., Preface, p. IV.): "Communis vivorum doctorum fere omnium
nunc invaluit opinio eas [constitutiones] saeculo tertio clam succrevisse et quum sex aliquando libris septimo et octavo auctas
esse postea."
267
As Bickell supposes. Beveridge put the collection in the third century.
268
According to Daillé, Dr.
von Drey, and Mejer.
119
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
I. Several Tracts of Tertullian (especially De Poenitentia). The Philosophumena of Hippolytus (l.
IX.). The Epistles of Cyprian, and his work De Lapsis. The Epistolae Canonicae of Dionysius
of Alex., Gregory Thaumaturgus (about 260), and Peter of Alex. (about 306), collected in
Routh’s Reliquiae Sacrae, tom. III., 2nd ed. The Constit. Apost. II. 16, 21–24. The Canons of
the councils of Elvira, Arelate, Ancyra, Neo-Caesarea, and Nicaea, between 306 and 325 (in
the Collections of Councils, and in Routh’s Reliq. Sacr. tom. IV.).
II. Morinus: De Disciplina in administratione sacram poenitentiae, Par. 1651 (Venet. 1702).
Marshall: Penitential Discipline of the Primitive Church. Lond. 1714 (new ed. 1844).
Fr. Frank:
Die Bussdisciplin der Kirche bis
zum 7 Jahrh. Mainz. 1868.
On the discipline of the Montanists, see Bonwetsch:
Die Geschichte des Montanismus
(1881), pp. 108–118.
The ancient church was distinguished for strict discipline. Previous to Constantine the Great,
this discipline rested on purely moral sanctions, and had nothing to do with civil constraints and
punishments. A person might be expelled from one congregation without the least social injury.
But the more powerful the church became, the more serious were the consequences of her censures,
and when she was united with the state, ecclesiastical offenses were punished as offenses against
the state, in extreme cases even with death. The church always abhorred blood ("ecclesia non sitit
sanguiem"), but she handed the offender over to the civil government to be dealt with according
to law. The worst offenders for many centuries were heretics or teachers of false doctrine.
The object of discipline was, on the one hand, the dignity and purity of the church, on the
other, the spiritual welfare of the offender; punishment being designed to be also correction. The
extreme penalty was excommunication, or exclusion from all the rights and privileges of the faithful.
This was inflicted for heresy and schism, and all gross crimes, such as, theft, murder, adultery,
blasphemy, and the denial of Christ in persecution. After Tertullian, these and like offences
incompatible with the regenerate state, were classed as mortal sins,
269
69
in distinction from venial
sins or sins of weakness.
270
70
Persons thus excluded passed into the class of penitents,
271
71 and could attend only the
catechumen worship. Before they could be re-admitted to the fellowship of the church, they were
required to pass through a process like that of the catechumens, only still more severe, and to prove
the sincerity of their penitence by the absence from all pleasures, from ornament in dress, and from
nuptial intercourse, by confession, frequent prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and other good works.
Under pain of a troubled conscience and of separation from the only saving church, they readily
submitted to the severest penances. The church teachers did not neglect, indeed, to inculcate the
penitent spirit and the contrition of the heart is the main thing. Yet many of them laid too great
stress on certain outward exercises. Tertullian conceived the entire church penance as a "satisfaction"
paid to God. This view could easily obscure to a dangerous degree the all-sufficient merit of Christ,
and lead to that self-righteousness against which the Reformation raised so loud a voice.
269
Peccata mortalia, or, ad mortem; after a rather arbitrary interpretation of 1 John 5:16. Tertullian gives seven mortal sins:
Homocidium idololatria, fraus, negatio blasphemia. utique et moechia et. fornicatio et si qua alia violatio templi Dei. De pudic.
c. 19, These he declares irremissibilia,horum ultra exoratur non erit Christus; that is, if thev be committed after baptism; for
baptism washes, away all former guilt. Hence he counselled delay of baptism.
270
Peccata, venialia.
271
Poenitentes.
120
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.