the sons of God. This story is modified in Jubilees, where the leader of the
rebel angels is called Mastema. A different paradigm of the origin of evil is
Darkness are created from the beginning by God. But the destiny of human
beings is still shaped by the angelic spirits to whose lot they belong. The
Superhuman, angelic agency is also manifested in other ways. In Daniel, for
heaven and the angelic (or demonic) prince of Greece. The
Animal
Maccabee. All of this can be seen as an adaptation of common Near Eastern
apocalypses than in the earlier writings of the prophets. The effect is a sense
74
Judaism, Christianity and Islam
The most fundamental difference between the Jewish apocalypses and the
Hebrew prophets in my view concerns the judgment of the dead. The Hebrew
Bible is extreme in the literature of the ancient world in its rejection of
reward and punishment after death. There are, to be sure, some ambiguous
passages, where some scholars find evidence of resurrection or even of beatific
vision in the afterlife.
27
The only form of resurrection that is securely attested
before
the Hellenistic period, however, is the resurrection of the Jewish people
after the exile, as we find it in Ezekiel’s vision of the dry bones (Ezekiel
),
and also, I would argue, in Isaiah
:
.
28
In both Enoch and Daniel, however,
we have a hope of human transformation after death. Enoch has a vision of
chambers under a mountain where the spirits of the dead are divided into
separate categories (
Enoch
). More typical, however, is transformation to
an angelic state. In Daniel
we are told that the righteous teachers will
shine like the stars. The significance of this imagery is made clear by com-
parison with
Enoch
: ‘Be hopeful! … you will shine like the lights of
heaven and will be seen, and the gate of heaven will be opened to you … for
you will have great joy like the angels of heaven … for you shall be associates
of the host of heaven.’ What is envisioned here is not resurrection of the
body to renewed life on earth, but the exaltation of the ‘spiritual body’ or
nefesh
to angelic life in heaven. In the Hebrew Bible only an elect few, Enoch,
Moses and Elijah, could be said to share this destiny, because of the mysterious
nature of their departures. In the apocalyptic literature, such transformation
becomes the hope of all the righteous.
The implications of this new hope were far-reaching. In most of the
Hebrew Bible the goal of life was to live long in the land and to see one’s
children and one’s children’s children to the third or fourth generation. The
hope of the individual was very closely bound up with the hope of the people
of Israel. The blessings and curses of the covenant relate to the people as a
whole, not just to individuals. The apocalypses do not break completely with
this traditional, corporate utopian ideal. Daniel, for example, still speaks of
the kingdom that will be given to the people of the holy ones of the Most
High. Later apocalypses envision a messianic kingdom, and the ingathering
of the exiles. But a new element has also been introduced, where the destiny of
the individual is not dependent on progeny, or on the restoration of Israel.
In the Book of Daniel, the heroes are the wise teachers,
Dostları ilə paylaş: