|
 I, Vladimir Ganyukov, and Co-authors, do not have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this
|
tarix | 26.09.2018 | ölçüsü | 0,9 Mb. | | #70710 |
|
I, Vladimir Ganyukov, and Co-authors, DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation. I, Vladimir Ganyukov, and Co-authors, DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation.
Today, revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) is achieved mainly through CABG or DES-PCI Today, revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) is achieved mainly through CABG or DES-PCI Another less-evidenced approach is hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR: LIMA-LAD graft plus DES-PCI for the remaining vessel/s)
To compare, in a randomized trial setting, the current guideline-accepted coronary revascularization (CR) strategies in MV-CAD, including the hybrid approach To compare, in a randomized trial setting, the current guideline-accepted coronary revascularization (CR) strategies in MV-CAD, including the hybrid approach thus HREVS (Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Standards) is the first randomized study to assess safety and efficacy of contemporary coronary revascularization strategies in MV-CAD
Investigator-initiated academic trial conducted jointly by high-volume interventional cardiologists and high-volume cardiac surgeons Investigator-initiated academic trial conducted jointly by high-volume interventional cardiologists and high-volume cardiac surgeons Powered for the primary end-point of residual myocardial ischemia (RI) by SPECT at 12 months
Investigator-initiated academic trial conducted jointly by high-volume interventional cardiologists and high-volume cardiac surgeons Investigator-initiated academic trial conducted jointly by high-volume interventional cardiologists and high-volume cardiac surgeons CABG, PCI and HCR arms utilize the best, routinely available techniques and devices Powered for the primary end-point of residual myocardial ischemia (RI) by SPECT at 12 months
MV-CAD involving LAD - ≥70% DS (QCA) or
- 50 - 69% with FFR ≤0.80 or SPECT evidence of regional ischemia
Clinical and anatomic feasibility of CABG, PCI and HCR as agreed to by the local Heart Team
Any prior CABG or PCI Any prior CABG or PCI Left main coronary artery stenosis Chronic total occlusion(s) Cardiac surgery other than CABG Circumstances precluding equal feasibility of the three CR strategies
At 12 months, residual myocardial ischemia and MACCE were similar across the three study arms (CABG, HCR, PCI) At 12 months, residual myocardial ischemia and MACCE were similar across the three study arms (CABG, HCR, PCI) PCI (2nd generation DES) showed the shortest hospital stay and sick-leave duration Extended follow-up will determine longer-term outcomes
HREVS at 12 mo provides no evidence for HCR benefit(s) in patients in whom PCI, CABG, or HCR are equally feasible HREVS at 12 mo provides no evidence for HCR benefit(s) in patients in whom PCI, CABG, or HCR are equally feasible Shorter hospitalization and quicker recovery (return to work) with MV (DES) PCI may provide healthcare system benefits (longer follow-up required)
Study not powered for clinical endpoints Average Syntax score in the HREVS study (19.4) is in the lower-intermediate range (attibutable to the protocol requirement of equal treatment feasibility with 3 modalities) 12-month follow-up may not be sufficient in the context of potential longer-term differences
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|