35
U
IELTS Writing Task 2: 'minority languages' essay
U
Today, I'd like to share a 'band 9' sample essay for the question below.
Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very
small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public
money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of
money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it
can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I
believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.
There are several reasons why saving minority languages could
be seen as a waste of
money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive
education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the
state will
have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be
better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would
be much cheaper and more
efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of
costs related to communicating with each minority group.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve
languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much
more than simply a means
of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people
who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and
we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By
spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve
traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to
disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our
cultural heritage.
(258 words)
