International accessibility standards betty Dion Chair, icta – global



Yüklə 476 b.
tarix07.11.2017
ölçüsü476 b.
#8965


INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS

  • Betty Dion Chair, ICTA – GLOBAL


Introductions

  • Thomas Lagerwall – Secretary General of Rehabilitation International

  • Accessibility of Presentation

  • ICTA Global



Objectives

  • Harmonization

  • Accessibility in ALL Rebuilding /Reconstruction

  • Infrastructure/Transportation/ Accessibility of the Built Environment



  • Evolution of Accessibility

  • in Building Codes & Standards

  • An Historic Perspective



Charitable Model

  • “ I guess we should let those guys in.”



Social Model - Moving Towards Inclusion

  • “ I guess we should have Braille for those handicapped deaf people”



Independent Living Model

  • “ Now we will have to let them join the committee”



Accessibility As A Human Right

  • Right to Access

  • Movement towards accessibility as a human right



Human Rights Model - Inclusion

  • “ Nothing About Us, Without Us.”



Evolution of Codes & Standards

  • Countries working in isolation

  • Evolution of Technical Requirements



Evolution of Codes & Standards



Evolution of Codes & Standards



Evolution of Codes & Standards



Evolution of Codes & Standards



Universal Design



Best Practices: A Comparative Study

  • Technical specifications

  • Commentary

  • Diagrams & Photos

    • Building Elements
    • Landscape Elements


Countries Reviewed

  • USA Australia

  • China (Beijing) Canada

  • Japan Nordic Countries

  • Fiji England



Technical Information

  • Comparison of basic elements

    • Entrances; ramps, stairs, door widths
    • Signage
    • Wayfinding
    • Landscape


  • Washroom



  • Curb Ramps



Commentary

  • 30 Commentary Ceiling lights should direct people along the main walkways in open concept layouts.

  • 31 Commentary Lighting transitions should occur between light and dark areas. To prevent a "dazzle" when walking from a dark interior to the outdoors.



Anthropometrics Comparisons and Differences

  • Footprint

  • Turning radius

  • Minimum clear headroom



Doors & Entrances Comparisons and Differences

  • Minimum manoeuvring space at doors

  • Minimum door widths

  • Maximum threshold



Washrooms Comparisons and Differences

  • Minimum length and depth between walls

  • Toilet Seat Height

  • Grab Bar Space



Elevators Comparisons and Differences

  • Volume Control on help phone

  • Visual Indicator to register help calls



Stairs Comparisons and Differences

  • Riser height

  • Detectable warning

    • Requirements
    • location


Best Practice - Detectable Warnings

  • Tactile

  • Colour



Best Practice - Access and Egress

  • Interior ramp



Best Practice - Wayfinding

  • Colour

  • Texture

  • Shapes



Best Practice - Grab Bars



Best Practice - Fire Safety



Global Demand

  • Circulation Best Practices in Universal Design: A Comparative Study

  • Demand for new information

    • Updated codes & standards
    • Developing countries


Best Practices: Applied

  • ANDRES BALCAZAR DE LA CRUZ

  • Architect – Mexico

  • Vice President, ICTA- North America



International Organization for Standardization

  • ISO/TC 59/SC 16 Accessibility & Usability of the Built Environment

  • International Harmonization

  • Cultural and Geographical Considerations



International Accessibility Developments

  • Asia Pacific Region - UNESCAP standard

  • UN Standard for Beirut reconstruction

  • US Foreign Appropriations Bill



Do We Need International Standards ?

  • Harmonization

  • New Construction & Development

  • Rebuilding/ Reconstruction



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis

  • do the math:

  • 100 children directly impacted for future social services

  • + 100 children indirectly impacted to assist disabled family member

  • 200 in need of social support services per year

  • X $8,000 social services costs due to lack of access to education

  • $1,600,000 lifetime costs of inaccessible school/education

  • - $600 investment in accessibility measures for school

  • $1,599,400 TOTAL social costs for inaccessible school



Accessibility -Cost Benefit Analysis

  • Another way to view this same is:

  • 100 children directly impacted for future social services

  • + 100 children indirectly impacted to assist disabled family member

  • 200 in need of social support services per year

  • x $200 per year social services costs due to lack of education

  • $40,000 per year in social services for impacted group

  • - $6 accessibility investment per year for 100 year school

  • $39,994 TOTAL per year social costs for inaccessible school



Comprehensive Approach to Accessibility

  • Codes and Standards for

    • The Built Environment
    • Transportation
    • Infrastructure


Article 19

  • Self Determination

  • Full Access



Article 19

  • State responsibilities

    • Prevent new barriers
    • National plans and Regulations
    • Training and Education
    • People with Disabilities


Article 19

  • States shall

    • Universal Design Principles
    • Visual and Tactile Markings
    • New Assistive Technologies
    • Mass Media
    • Different forms of Assistance


Yüklə 476 b.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə