MTD
www.mtddergisi.com
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ TASARIM VE MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
Ocak / Şubat / Mart / Nisan 2017 Sayı: 10 Kış - İlkbahar
INTERNATIONALREFEREEDJOURNAL OF DESIGNANDARCHITECTURE
January / February / March / April 2017 Issue: 10 Winter – Spring
ID:163 K:05
ISSN Print: 2148-8142 Online: 2148-4880
(ISO 18001-OH-0090-13001706 / ISO 14001-EM-0090-13001706 / ISO 9001-QM-0090-13001706 / ISO 10002-CM-0090-13001706)
(Marka Patent No / Trademark
(2015/04018 – 2015/GE/17595)
301
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ
TASARIM MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
INTERNATIONAL REFEREED
JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE
PRINT ISSN: 2148-8142 - ONLINE ISSN: 2148-4880
GÜLTEKİN, A.B., BULUT, B., (2015). Yeşil
Bina Sertifika Sistemleri: Türkiye İçin Bir
Sistem Önerisi. 2. International Buildings
Symposium, Ankara
LEED (2013.) Reference Guide for Building
Design and Construction v4.
www.usgbc.
org
, Erişim Tarihi: 24.01.2017
ÖZDEMİR, E., (2012). Mevzuat ve Yeşil
Bina Sertifikaları Bağlamında Yapı
Malzemelerinin Seçimi ve Türkiye
İçin Gereklilikler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi,
Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, İstanbul
PALABIYIK, S., NASIR, A., SOYGENİŞ,
M., (2010). “Sürdürülebilirlik: Mimari
Tasarım
Stüdyosuna
Yaklaşım”,
International Sustainable Buildings
Symposium, Ankara
SEV, A., CANBAY, N., (2009). Dünya
Genelinde Uygulanan Yeşil Bina
Değerlendirme ve Sertifika Sistemleri,
Yapı Dergisi Yapıda Ekoloji Eki, 329:42-
47
Yazar Notu: Bu Çalışma Reva Şermet’in
yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir.
MTD
www.mtddergisi.com
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ TASARIM VE MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
Ocak / Şubat / Mart / Nisan 2017 Sayı: 10 Kış - İlkbahar
INTERNATIONALREFEREEDJOURNAL OF DESIGNANDARCHITECTURE
January / February / March / April 2017 Issue: 10 Winter – Spring
ID:163 K:05
ISSN Print: 2148-8142 Online: 2148-4880
(ISO 18001-OH-0090-13001706 / ISO 14001-EM-0090-13001706 / ISO 9001-QM-0090-13001706 / ISO 10002-CM-0090-13001706)
(Marka Patent No / Trademark
(2015/04018 – 2015/GE/17595)
302
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ
TASARIM MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
INTERNATIONAL REFEREED
JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE
PRINT ISSN: 2148-8142 - ONLINE ISSN: 2148-4880
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
Rapid population growth, industrialization, weak urban planning, and global warming the
unconscious use of natural resources, climate change, depletion of the ozone layer damage
constitutes environmental problems such as global threat today. As a preventative measure,
“Sustainable Development” concept has emerged. In all industries, we have started observing
solutions that promise to provide economic, ecological, and social sustainability. The construc-
tion industry has also a significant role contributing to sustainability due to involvement in wide
variety of projeortaya çıkmakcts impacting the environment, such as: housing, roads, infrast-
ructure and public spaces. Therefore, various polices have been developed by governments and
civil society organizations to encourage widespread application of “Green Building”, “Nature
Friendly Building” , “Sustainable Construction” , “Sustainable City” concepts. The purpose
of study is to review the concept of sustainability and green building, green building certifi-
cation systems on the basis of the literature review and developed certification systems is to
contribute. According to The Office of the Federal Environmental Executive, Green building
is the practice of creating structures and using processes that are environmentally responsible
and resource-efficient throughout a building’s life-cycle from siting to design, construction,
operation, maintenance, renovation and deconstruction. Establishing rules to increase the value
of the buildings by making various legal arrangements all around the world and aiming to be
produced for a 100 years of life. Additionally, specialized certifications have been established
all over the world to audit public buildings and other structures. In 1990, the United Kingdom
became the first country to launch a green building standard: BREEAM—The Building
Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. After BREEAM, LEED (USA),
SBTool(International) EcoProfile(Norway), Green Star (Australia) CASBEE (Japan), DGNB
(Deutschland) developed many certification systems. Certifications require structures to comply
with the criteria that ensure minimal or preferably no damage to the environment, people and
climate. Audited structures are documented; compliant ones are rewarded to motivate the ot-
her competitive players. Within scope of the study; scrutinizing the internationally accepted
LEED, BREEAM and DGNB certificates specialized in new nature-friendly housing projects.
Although the common goal of green building certification systems created is both parallels, the
system has its own unique methods. Due to the fact that the calculation systems are different in
addition to the common purpose motors, evaluations according to LEED, BREEAM or DGNB
MTD
www.mtddergisi.com
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ TASARIM VE MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
Ocak / Şubat / Mart / Nisan 2017 Sayı: 10 Kış - İlkbahar
INTERNATIONALREFEREEDJOURNAL OF DESIGNANDARCHITECTURE
January / February / March / April 2017 Issue: 10 Winter – Spring
ID:163 K:05
ISSN Print: 2148-8142 Online: 2148-4880
(ISO 18001-OH-0090-13001706 / ISO 14001-EM-0090-13001706 / ISO 9001-QM-0090-13001706 / ISO 10002-CM-0090-13001706)
(Marka Patent No / Trademark
(2015/04018 – 2015/GE/17595)
303
ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ
TASARIM MİMARLIK DERGİSİ
INTERNATIONAL REFEREED
JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE
PRINT ISSN: 2148-8142 - ONLINE ISSN: 2148-4880
certification systems for the same building give different results.
Standarts: The DGNB certi-
fication system, unlike LEED and BREEAM, is approachable and respectful to national laws,
regulations and standards and can be revised by the standards of the country where it exists.
Selected method: LEED and BREEAM certification systems earn points to be tracked. But
DGNB certification system earns points according to the result.
Priority: The priority of the
LEED certification system is to increase the quality of life of those who use it. The priority of
the BREEAM certification system is to minimize the damage done to the environment. But the
DGNB certificate gives priority to social and economic factors. Each country needs to develop
its own certification system. Due to differences in climate, culture, infrastructure, material di-
versity, geographical and legal issues, one standard certification for all countries is not a viable
option. Since 2007, ÇEDBIK has been developing a green building certification system for
Turkey. Considering the profession discipline of landscape architecture, the resulting conc-
lusion is that the developed certification systems need to be developed in public spaces, not
just for constructions. Although the buildings are the smallest and largest units of the cities,
sustainable environment and sustainable cities can only be achieved by ensuring sustainability
in their public spaces, not by constructions alone. With the certification of the public sphere,
municipalities will compete and therefore will make useful investments for both the public and
the environment. Another point is the use of green materials. Sustainable material production
and consumption must be encouraged for this. The most important factor in achieving sustai-
nability is the development of environmental awareness. Environmental awareness needs to be
introduced not only in the meetings attended by the relevant professional disciplines but also in
the way that everyone can see and understand.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |