Learning
from Lesbos
10
Introduction
(continued)
The largest city on Lesbos, Mytilene, has a population of
nearly 30,000 and is home to the Lesbos municipal office,
a university, and a diverse range of businesses and service
providers. The rapid influx of large numbers of refugees and
migrants to the island in a nine-month period has created
an urgent need to provide assistance to people who are
extremely vulnerable and often in severe need. At the same
time, this situation has had a significant impact on the lives
of local residents, government agencies, and businesses,
all of whom had already been struggling to adapt to the
effects of the Greek economic crisis. While working to
meet the needs of those who have been forced to flee their
homes, and those who find themselves housing thousands
of unexpected new arrivals, humanitarian actors cannot
afford to neglect the opportunities and challenges that
are presented by operating in a complex urban setting.
At the start of the crisis, people arriving by boat to
the northern shores of Lesbos faced safety concerns,
primarily within the town of Molyvos. They were unable
to legally access services in Molyvos without their
presence first being registered by the police, which
meant making a 70-kilometre journey south, to Mytilene.
Commercial transport operators and private individuals
were initially prohibited from transporting new arrivals
who had not yet registered with police (who provided
a “police note” to this effect) and the municipality did
not have the resources to move such large numbers of
people. Until agreements were struck for collaborations
between municipal authorities and organisations such
as the IRC to provide transport for this journey, many
people had no option other than to set out on foot.
Upon reaching Mytilene, refugees and migrants were housed
in one of three primary sites within the city: Kara Tepe, Moria
or Pikpa. Facilities at these sites ranged from temporary
housing (at Kara Tepe) to a disused prison (Moria) and simple
allotment near the beach (Pikpa). Kara Tepe, a site managed
by the municipality, and with services provided by a number
of NGOs, was initially meant to provide shelter primarily
for Syrian families but has since opened to vulnerable
families and individuals of other nationalities as well.
Moria is managed entirely by the Greek Ministry of Migration.
Pikpa, meanwhile, is a more informal site, managed by
self-organised volunteers and reserved for vulnerable
refugees and migrants who are referred by protection actors
(such as the IRC or UNHCR) after arriving on the island.
At the height of the crisis, all who arrived on Lesbos from Turkey
were supposed to stay only in these three sites in Mytilene.
However, they simply were not big enough to accommodate
all who came. At one point in November 2015, a strike by
the operators of the ferries that would normally transport
refugees and migrants onward to mainland Greece from
Mytilene left tens of thousands of people stranded on
Lesbos. Forced to wait for days in and around the main
port of Mytilene, many resorted to setting up tents near the
main road.
6
As numbers of refugees and migrants swelled,
the daily routine of the port city ground to a standstill.
Too often in the case of Lesbos, people and organisations
working to address the needs of new arrivals failed to
pay adequate attention to the impacts of the influx on
the host population. Mistrust and discontent among the
host population resulted, and at one point, the Mayor of
Lesbos was reported as saying: “I have seen many NGOs
and individuals coming without official registration and
showing no cooperation with our municipality. This causes
everyone upset and these NGOs arouse doubt and mistrust
among the residents of Lesbos. I would say their presence
is disruptive rather than useful.”
7
A long-term resident of
Lesbos underlined the fact that the host community was
also affected by this mass movement of people: “It is not
only a crisis for the refugees, it is a crisis for every local
community that the refugee crisis passes through.”
8
Learning from Lesbos
11
The IRC’s Response on Lesbos
When planning its involvement in the humanitarian operation
on Lesbos, the IRC took care to ensure that its work
addressed identified needs while respecting and leveraging
the support of the governmental, economic, and social
systems that exist on Lesbos. The IRC therefore sought to:
k
Gain the trust of local government by
utilising and supporting the service-provision
systems of the Municipality of Lesbos
and fully recognising its authority;
k
Take steps to achieve a more coordinated response
among the various actors (proactive coordination was
largely lacking on Lesbos until the second half of 2015);
k
Leverage the resources of the island – municipal,
commercial and social – while striving to ensure
continuity of services for the host community; and,
k
Consult with local communities regarding
ongoing humanitarian programming.
Many challenges remained, however. For example, the lengthy
procedure for an organisation to be registered to operate
on Lesbos, and to gain approval for specific programmes
caused significant delays for the IRC. Without an effective
mechanism for coordination, the IRC, like many other
international NGOs struggled to ensure that host and
refugee/migrant populations were well informed about its
programmes (this was particularly the case in Molyvos).
Given the constantly changing nature of the crisis,
the IRC placed extra emphasis on ensuring there was
continuous monitoring, evaluation and adaptation of its
response to better suit the urban context of Lesbos.
From summer 2015 until March 2016, the IRC’s
programmes therefore adapted to shifts in European
and Greek policy, the temperament and politics of the
island and its population, and the changing needs of
refugees/migrants and the communities hosting them.
opposite: Newly arrived refugees in Molyvos make their way down from
the coast to catch a bus to Oxy.
Kulsoom Rizvi/IRC
below: People wait for ferries to take them to mainland Greece.
Once a refugee arrives in Lesbos they must register as an asylum
seeker; after their paperwork is completed they can continue on
their journey north.
Epaminondas/IRC