6
7
L
IST OF
T
ABLES AND
F
IGURES
Figures:
Tables:
Table 1. Parameter values for the component terms (P
i
and m
i
) that make up the vital rates in the
projection matrix for long-billed curlew........................................................................................................ 25
Table 2. Stable age distribution...................................................................................................................... 28
Table 3. Reproductive values......................................................................................................................... 28
Table 4. Results of four different stochastic projections for long-billed curlew............................................ 28
Figure 1. Map of USDA Forest Service Region 2. ......................................................................................... 7
Figure 2. Relative breeding season distribution and abundance of long-billed curlew. ................................ 11
Figure 3. Relative winter season distribution and abundance of long-billed curlew..................................... 12
Figure 4. Population trend of long-billed curlew survey wide from 1966 to 2004. ...................................... 13
Figure 5. Population trend of long-billed curlew for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6 from 1966
to 2004. .......................................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 6. Population trend of long-billed curlew for Central Region of the Breeding Bird Survey from
1966 to 2004. ................................................................................................................................................. 14
Figure 7. Breeding Bird Survey trend map for long-billed curlew from 1966 to 2003................................. 15
Figure 8. Life cycle graph for long-billed curlew.......................................................................................... 25
Figure 9a. Symbolic values for the projection matrix of vital rates, A (with cells a
ij
) corresponding to the
long-billed curlew life cycle graph of Figure 8. ............................................................................................ 26
Figure 9b. Numeric values for the projection matrix of vital rates, A (with cells a
ij
) corresponding to the
long-billed curlew life cycle graph of Figure 8. ............................................................................................ 26
Figure 10. Possible sensitivities matrix. ........................................................................................................ 27
Figure 11. Elasticity matrix............................................................................................................................ 27
Figure 12a. Resources centrum of the long-billed curlew envirogram.......................................................... 31
Figure 12b. Malentities centrum of the long-billed curlew envirogram........................................................ 32
Figure 12c. Predators/competitors centrum of the long-billed curlew envirogram....................................... 33
Figure 13. Map of Bird Conservation Regions of the United States. ............................................................ 42
Figure 14. Map of Breeding Bird Survey strata............................................................................................. 43
Figure 15. Map of Physiographic Areas as defined by Partners in Flight...................................................... 44
6
7
I
NTRODUCTION
This conservation assessment is one of many
being produced to support the Species Conservation
Project for the Rocky Mountain Region (Region 2),
USDA Forest Service (USFS) (Figure 1). The long-
billed curlew is the focus of an assessment because it
has been added to the Regional Forester’s Sensitive
Species List (Revised 2003). Within the National
Forest System, a sensitive species is a plant or animal
whose population viability is identified as a concern
by a Regional Forester because of significant current
or predicted downward trends in abundance and/or
habitat capability that would reduce its distribution
(FSM 2670.5 [19]). Because a sensitive species may
require special management, knowledge of its biology
and ecology is critical. This assessment addresses the
biology and conservation of the long-billed curlew
throughout its range, with emphasis on Region 2.
Goal
Species conservation assessments produced as
part of the Species Conservation Project are designed
to provide land managers, biologists, other agencies,
and the public with a thorough treatment of the
biology, ecology, conservation, and management of
certain species based on current scientific knowledge.
The assessment goals limit the scope of the work to
critical summaries of information needs. Although
the assessment does not seek to develop prescriptive
management recommendations, it does develop the
ecological context upon which management must be
based and focuses on the consequences of changes in
the environment that result from management (i.e.,
management implications). Furthermore, it discusses
and evaluates management recommendations currently
in use or proposed elsewhere.
Figure 1. Regional map of USDA Forest Service Region 2. National grasslands and forests are shaded in green.