10
substitutability toward economic growth while stabilizing around the average in the short-run
will lead to K/H complementarity in explaining the economic growth process.
The above model can be best expressed by logistic curve which has been put forward in
our previous study (Erk, Altan and Ateş, 1998) showing why GDP growth rates alter between
developed and developing countries.
Graph 2. GDP Level-K/H Logistic Curve
In brief, increasing at and increasing rate segment of the logistic curve coincides with the
developing countries and the increasing at and the decreasing rate segment represent the
developed countries slope of the logistic curve alternative growth rates between developed and
developing countries.
In testing the formal model, we have the following assumptions;
•
Labor human capital is far more important than the labor itself in the production process.
•
Technological change is a function of physical capital growth.
•
Human capital measured with Barro-Lee data permits human capital in its broadest
definition.
•
Human capital and physical capital factors show complementarity
In a dynamic relationship between GDP growth rate and physical capital-human capital
concentration ratio, our formal model is given by the following equation:
(7)
t
t
t
t
H
K
L
B
g
L
A
g
ε
+
+
=
−
)
/
)(
(
)
(
1
g
t
: GDP growth rate
A(L)
and B(L): lag operator
K
: physical capital
H
: human capital
GDP
H
K
e
GDP
/
1
+
=
α
K/H
11
4. Findings of the Study
Looking at the data used to test the model, we have taken human capital data for Austria,
Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United
Kingdom and the United States human capital data from Barro-Lee data set (1993), physical
capital stock data from Nehru-Dharashwar (1993) and GDP data from World Bank International
Statistics (1994). Human capital and physical capital stock data has been annual data adjusted for
quarterly data looking at the flow nature of accumulation in both. GDP data has been corrected
for its base year to be 1990. All calculations had been conducted under TSP software (version
1.0A) to test impulse response functions and variance decompositions. Our hypothesis to be
tested assumes that innovations towards K/H concentration ratio will to move to averages, in the
short run, showing that key factor explaining GDP growth stand from K/H concentration and
other variables have zero growth effect in the long-run. Besides this, we also expect short
disturbances in the impulse response functions due to the complementarity property of physical
capital stock and human capital stock.
In the test of dynamic time series analysis, to determine the stationarity of the data,
initially ADF test has been used. In this respect all GDP data showed stationary behavior. Some
K/H series also showed stationary behavior, while very limited country data showed non-
stationary behavior, corrected by taking the differences. In implementing optimal lags for the
model Schwartz Information Criteria has been used. Some non-stationary data has shown
second degree cointegration.
12
Table 1. Dynamic Impulse-Response of Growth Rates to One Standart
Physical Capital-Human Capital Ratio Innovation
Period Austria Australia Canada France Germany
Italy
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 0.007 0.460 -0.027 -0.031 0.197 0.323
3 0.121 0.719 0.067 -0.058 0.309 0.310
4 0.046 0.583 0.075 -0.076 0.426 0.197
5 0.029 0.243 0.065 -0.086 0.297 0.041
6 0.057 0.122 0.049 -0.091 0.321 -0.069
7 -0.002 -0.200 0.035 -0.092 0.284 -0.132
8 -0.008 -0.254 0.9025 -0.090 0.154 -0.148
9 -0.012 -0.242 0.017 -0.086 0.068 -0.127
10 -0.035 -0.240 0.012 -0.082 0.026 -0.081
11 -0.025 -0.121 0.008 -0.076 -0.043 -0.026
12 -0.026 -0.042 0.005 -0.071 -0.073 0.023
13 -0.025 -0.001 0.004 -0.065 -0.077 0.055
14 -0.014 0.066 0.002
-0.060
-0.070 0.067
15 -0.012 0.063 0.002
-0.055
-0.051 0.059
16 -0.006 0.055 0.001 -0.050 -0.026 0.040
17 -0.002 0.050 0.001 -0.046 -0.003 0.015
18 -0.002 0.017 0.001 -0.042 0.017 -0.008
19 -0.001 0.004 0.000
-0.038 0.029 -0.023
20 -0.002 -0.006 0.000 -0.035 0.034 -0.030
30 -0.008 0.003 0.000 -0.016 -0.008 0.000
40 -0.008 0.000 0.000 -0.010 0.000 0.002
50 -0.008 0.000 0.000 -0.008 0.000 0.000
60 -0.008 0.000 0.000 -0.007 0.000 0.000
Period
Japan
Norway
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
2 -0.014 0.211 0.135 0.219 0.235
-0.079
3 0.073 0.069 0.072 -0.037
0.313 0.064
4 -0.021 0.045 0.043 0.180 0.194 -0.170
5 -0.160 0.017 0.025 0.134 0.144 -0.201
6 -0.125 0.006 0.013 0.087 0.119 -0.206
7 -0.133 -0.001 0.006 0.073
0.092 -0.175
8 -0.140 -0.004 0.002 0.044
0.071 -0.114
9 -0.103 -0.006 -0.001 0.025 0.055 -0.059
10 -0.069 -0.007 -0.003
0.014 0.043
-0.012
11 -0.038 -0.008 -0.004
0.005
0.033
0.019
12 -0.003 -0.008 -0.004
0.001 0.026 0.034
13 0.020 -0.008 -0.005 -0.001 0.020 0.036
14 0.036 -0.008 -0.005 -0.002
0.016 0.031
15 0.045 -0.009 -0.005 -0.002
0.012 0.022
16 0.044 -0.009 -0.005 -0.002
0.009
0.012
17 0.038 -0.009 -0.005 -0.001 0.007 0.004
18 0.028 -0.009 -0.005 -0.001 0.006 -0.002
19 0.017 -0.009 -0.005 -0.001 0.004 -0.005
20 0.006 -0.009 -0.006
0.000
0.003
-0.006
30 0.002 -0.009 -0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
40 -0.001 -0.009 -0.006 0.000
0.000
0.000
50 0.000 -0.009 -0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
60 0.000 -0.009 -0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000