12
paranormal, despite some strong empirical evidence (Thalbourne, 1997).
However, many of the phenomena associated with traditional religion (in
this case Christianity) such as miracles, resurrection, souls etc. also violate
the basic limiting principles of science and therefore some authors suggested
that they fit the stated definition of paranormality (e.g. Tobayck and
Pirittila-Backman, 1992). Hence, it is clear that further research will be
necessary to explore and verify the limited and mixed findings that have
been produced so far.
1.2. RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND PERSONALITY
Paradoxically, while the major religions proclaim brotherly love, history has
shown that religion has often been used as a justification for violence and
prejudices – e.g. the Spanish Inquisition (1478 – 1834) in Europe
2
(Eliade,
1990). This, amongst other reasons, has been a spur for researchers to shed
light on the personality-religiosity relationship.
Initial attempts to measure religiosity were performed by calculating the
frequency of church attendance and the belief in the existence of a
transcendent reality
3
. This has slowly made way towards more sophisticated
measurement methods and the use of personality theories to inform the
research.
Early research with regard to personality and religiosity used Eysenck’s
three-dimensional model of personality, based on the underlying factors of
Psychoticism, Extraversion and Neuroticism (PEN) (Eysenck and Eysenck,
1968, 1985). Eysenck and Eysenck (1968; 1985) confirmed that in a very
2
The Spanish Inquisition was used for both political and religious reasons. Spain is a
nation-state that was born out of religious struggle between numerous different belief
systems including Catholicism, Islam, Protestantism and Judaism. Following the Crusades
and the Reconquest of Spain by the Christian Spaniards the leaders of Spain needed a way
to unify the country into a strong nation. Ferdinand and Isabella chose Catholicism to unite
Spain and in 1478 asked permission of the pope to begin the Spanish Inquisition to purify
the people of Spain. They began by driving out Jews, Protestants and other non-believers.
3
Transcendence is effectively the belief of having existence outside of the created, physical
world.
13
limited way, different kinds of religiosity correspond to differences in
personality traits, although some other studies failed to find any link
between religious attitudes and personality (e.g. Chau, Johnson, Bowers,
Darvill and Danko, 1990; D’Onofrio, Eaves, Murrelle, Maes and Spilka,
1995; Heaven, 1990; Robinson, 1990). However, in general a series of
studies across cultures and denominations converged on the opinion that
religious people tend to score lower on Psychoticism (Francis, 1992a,
1992b, 1993; Francis and Katz, 1992; Francis and Pearson, 1993; Lewis and
Joseph, 1994; Lewis and Maltby, 1995, 1996; Maltby, 1999a, 1999b). As
for the other two factors, different studies produced different results and
these inconsistencies lead researchers to believe that these factors are
unrelated to religiosity (Eysenck, 1998; Francis, 1992b).
Studies using the Five-Factor Model of personality produced a slightly
different result. In many studies (Saroglou, 2002; Kosek, 1999, 2000; Taylor
& McDonald, 1999), religiousness is positively related to Agreeableness and
Conscientiousness, although these correlations are low (Saroglou, 2002) or
sometimes even absent (Streyffeler & McNally, 1998; Saucier & Goldberg,
1998). This also confirms the hypothesis of the low correlation between
Psychoticism and religion in the Three Factor Model. Although in most of
the studies no significant relation between religion and other factors of the
Five Factor Model (Saroglou, 2002) has been found, other studies suggest
that religious people should be situated high on some of the other factors as
well (Duriez, 2002; McCrae, 1999; Taylor & MacDonald, 1999). Religiosity
was weakly correlated with Extraversion, and there was a small but
significant effect size regarding Openness to Experience (Saroglou, 2002).
Saroglou (2002) as well McCrae (1996; 1999) mentioned the complex but
clear pattern of relation between religion and Openness to Experience.
Participants who have high scores on Openness to Experience are associated
with “open and mature religion” (Saroglou, 2002). Saroglou (2002) also
mentioned the striking result that religious fundamentalists are associated
with low Openness to Experience. This factor has to be examined in further
research. However, one should take into consideration that most of the
above-mentioned results have been found in studies in which researchers
14
have been working with a uni-dimensional model. The innovative aspect of
the Post-Critical Belief Scale is the proposed two-dimensional structure of
religiosity. Although in line with previous research, where none of the five
factors of personality correlate significantly with religiosity as it was
measured by the Literal vs. Symbolic dimension, a significant correlation
with Openness to Experience was found. This is in line with Duriez,
Soenens, & Beyers (2003), McCrae (1996, 1999), McCrae, Zimmermann,
Costa, & Bond, (1996), and Saroglou (2002) Duriez, Luyten, Snauwaert,
Hutsebaut (2002), who expected Openness to Experience to be crucial in
order to understand the relation between religiosity and personality.
In a similar approach to paranormal beliefs, Openness to Experience has
been suggested as an important factor that might lead to a better
understanding of religiosity (McCrae, 1999), as individuals high in this
factor are thought to be characterised by a particularly permeable structure
of consciousness. This has been supported by a study by Streyffeler and
McNally (1998), who found liberal and fundamentalist Protestants to differ
with respect to this factor, but not to any other factor of the FFM. This
factor, given its definition, is hypothesised to be highly relevant for the way
in which religious issues are interpreted and processed.
To this end, Wulff (1991, 1997) has recently constructed a comprehensive
framework based on the theory of Paul Ricoeur to identify the various
possible approaches to religion (Peeters, 2003a & 2003b, Ricoeur1970 &
1990, Wallace, 1990). It attempts to arrange the approaches in two
orthogonal bipolar dimensions. The vertical axis -Exclusion versus Inclusion
of Transcendence- specifies whether or not objects of religious interest are
granted participation in a transcendent reality, and as such this gives an
indication whether or not an individual is religious/spiritual. The horizontal
axis -the Literal versus Symbolic dimension- refers to the ways of
interpreting religious expression, i.e. an individual can interpret things in a
literal or symbolic way. Thus, this dimension can be seen as a form of
cognitive comprehension in the way that religious material is processed. As
a result four quadrants can be formulated (Figure 1), each representing a
Dostları ilə paylaş: |