Differential regulation of the TRH gene promoter by
triiodothyronine and dexamethasone in pancreatic islets
P Fragner, S L Lee
1
and S Aratan de Leon
INSERM U-30, Mécanisme d’Action Cellulaire des Hormones, Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 Rue de Sèvres, Paris, France
1
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to S Aratan de Leon, Institut National de Santé et Recherche Médicale, INSERM Unité 30,
Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 Rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris Cedex 15, France; Email: aratan
@necker.fr)
Abstract
TRH was initially found in the hypothalamus and regu-
lates TSH secretion. TRH is also produced by insulin-
containing -cells. Endogenous TRH positively regulates
glucagon secretion and attenuates pancreatic exocrine
secretion. We have previously shown that triiodothyronine
(T
3
) down-regulates pre-pro-TRH gene expression in vivo
and in vitro. The present study was designed to determine
the initial impact of T
3
on rat TRH gene promoter and to
compare this e
ffect with that of dexamethasone (Dex).
Primary islet cells and neoplastic cells (HIT T-15 and RIN
m5F) were transiently transfected with fragments of the
5 -flanking sequence of TRH fused to the luciferase
reporter gene. The persistence of high TRH concen-
trations in fetal islets in culture, probably due to trans-
activating factors, allowed us to explore how T
3
and Dex
regulate the TRH promoter activity in transfected cells
and whether the hormone e
ffect is dependent on the cell
type considered. TRH gene promoter activity is inhibited
by T
3
in primary but not neoplastic cells and stimulated by
Dex in both primary and neoplastic cells of islets. These
findings validate previous in vivo and in vitro studies and
indicate the transcriptional impact of these hormones on
TRH gene expression in the pancreatic islets.
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
Introduction
Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) was originally iso-
lated from the hypothalamus (Boler et al. 1969, Burgus
et al. 1969) but is also synthesized in the islets of
Langerhans and localized in insulin-containing cells
(Aratan-Spire et al. 1984a, 1990, Leduque et al. 1987,
1989). Unlike major islet hormones, however, the highest
concentrations of TRH and pre-pro-TRH(160–169)
(pp-TRH) are detected during the early development of
neonatal rat pancreas (Aratan-Spire et al. 1984a, Ebiou
et al. 1992a) and human fetal pancreas (Leduque et al.
1986). This suggests that TRH gene products are involved
in the regulation or growth of fetal islets in an as yet
undefined way.
Hypothalamic TRH stimulates thyrotropin (TSH) se-
cretion (Boler et al. 1969, Burgus et al. 1969). Pancreatic
TRH is involved in the stimulation of glucagon secretion
(Ebiou et al. 1992b) and the inhibition of exocrine pan-
creatic secretion (Fragner et al. 1997). TRH
/
mice
showed obvious hypothyroidism and exhibited hyper-
glycemia accompanied by impaired insulin secretion, but
thyroid hormone replacement does not correct the deficit
in insulin secretion (Yamada et al. 1997). However,
despite its biological contribution as a regulatory peptide in
the adult pancreas, the physiological significance of TRH
in islet development remains an open question. Hence, a
clear picture of the hormonal control of TRH gene
expression may shed light on this point.
The thyroid hormone and the glucocorticoids exert
pleiotropic e
ffects on the endocrine pancreas. Previous
studies have shown that triiodothyronine (T
3
) selectively
inhibits the islet TRH content and secretion. The TRH
content (mRNA and peptide) of the pancreas of hypothy-
roid rats is elevated and this is reversed by exogenous T
3
replacement (Fragner et al. 1998). Conversely, T
3
pro-
duced a dose-dependent decrease in TRH mRNA and
the TRH content in fetal islets in culture (Fragner et al.
1999). In contrast, the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexam-
ethasone (Dex), up-regulates TRH mRNA and TRH of
the pituitary cells in culture (Bruhn et al. 1994), a thyroid
cell line (Tavianini et al. 1989) and in fetal islets in culture
(P Fragner & S Aratan de Leon, unpublished observations).
Two lines of evidence point to T
3
and Dex having a direct
influence on pp-TRH gene expression; the presence of
nuclear T
3
receptors in the pancreas (Lee et al. 1989) and
T
3
receptor binding site consensus sequences in the TRH
promoter (Stevenin & Lee 1995). A glucocorticoid regu-
latory element (GRE) is present on the TRH gene
promoter (Lee et al. 1988) and the pancreatic
-cells are
the only islet cells bearing the glucocorticoid receptor
(Fischer et al. 1990, Delaunay et al. 1997). The DNA
91
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
0022–0795/01/0170–091
2001 Society for Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain
Online version via http://www.endocrinology.org
elements mediating the negative regulation of pp-TRH
gene promoter by T
3
were localized in the promoter-
proximal region between
83 and +46 (Balkan et al.
1998) (Fig. 1). The present study was therefore carried out
to demonstrate the impact of two hormones, thyroid
hormone and glucocorticoid, on the transcription of TRH
gene and to validate previous data (Fragner et al. 1998,
1999), using the transient transfection of several TRH
promoter constructs in neoplastic islet cells and fetal islets
in culture. The persistence of high TRH gene expression
throughout the islet culture period (Scharfmann et al.
1988, Aratan-Spire et al. 1990, Ebiou et al. 1992a) suggests
the presence of high levels of transactivating factors. The
fetal islet in culture are therefore an appropriate model for
investigating the regulation of TRH promoter. The study
of the hormonal regulation of TRH gene promoter
may help link potentially the regulation of TRH gene
expression to islet development and function.
Materials and Methods
TRH promoter constructs
These contain the Pst-Pvu II fragment of rat TRH
genomic
DNA.
Promoter
truncations
(
554/
+84,
242/+84 and
113/+84) were created using
restriction endonucleases. The promoter fragments of
di
fferent lengths were cloned upstream of the luciferase
gene in the vector pA3 LUC (Fig. 1). This vector contains
a trimerized SV40 poly(A) termination site that prevents
transcription readthrough (Wood et al. 1989).
Cell culture
RIN m5F and HIT T-15 are two pancreatic islet cell lines
and 3T3 is a fibroblastic cell line. RIN m5F and 3T3 cells
were cultured in RPMI-1640 and HIT T-15 cells in
DMEM. All the standard media contained 10% fetal
calf serum (FCS) unless otherwise indicated. Cells were
routinely cultured in 5% CO
2
and 95% humidified air at
37 C.
Preparation of islets
Fetal islets were prepared according to Hellerström et al.
(1979). Briefly, fetuses were removed from pregnant
Wistar rats at 21 days of gestation. The day of mating was
considered to be day 0. The fetal pancreases were removed
aseptically, placed in cold Hanks’ balanced salt solution
(HBSS) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin and
100 µg/ml streptomycin, and minced. HBSS (4 ml) con-
taining 6 mg/ml collagenase CLS 4 (Worthington Bio-
chemical, Freehold, NJ, USA) were added to each of four
centrifuge tubes containing 10–12 pancreases each. The
tissue was digested in a shaking water bath at 37 C for
8 min. The resulting digests were washed three times with
cold HBSS; the pellets were pooled and resuspended in
500 µl HBSS. Aliquots of this suspension (100 µl) were
finally distributed in 50 mm plastic culture dishes. The
islets were cultured for 5 days in 5 ml RPMI-1640
medium, containing 11 mM glucose, 10% heat inactivated
FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin,
at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO
2
. The
medium was changed every day. At the end of the
preculture period, the islets attached to the bottom of the
culture dishes were gently blown free using a sterilized
Pasteur pipette under a stereomicroscope. The fibroblast
layer remaining on the bottom of the culture dishes was
used as a primary non-islet cell (negative) control. The
detached islets were cultured free-floating in 50 mm Petri
dishes which did not permit cell attachment (Falcon 1007;
Falcon Plastics, San Diego, CA, USA), in complete
Figure 1 Schematic representation of three fragments of the pp-TRH gene promoter. The
positions of a putative TATA box, a GRE (Lee et al. 1989) and a T
3
-response element
half-site (TRE) (Stevenin & Lee 1995) are indicated. Promoter fragments of indicated lengths
were cloned upstream of the luciferase gene in the vector pA3 LUC.
P FRAGNER
and others · TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets
92
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS
changed every other day.
About 1000 to 1500 islets were obtained from 10–15
fetal pancreases. The islets were distributed as 300–400
islets per dish. The precise number of islets per batch was
determined from the total insulin content per batch and
the insulin content per islet (Ebiou et al. 1992a, Fragner
et al. 1999).
Dispersion of islet cells
Islet cells were dispersed by
placing washed islets (1000–1500) in 500 µl calcium- and
magnesium-free HBSS containing trypsin (0·05%) and
EDTA (0·02%) for 5 min. An equal volume of culture
medium was then added and the remaining intact islets
were mechanically dispersed by mild trituration. The
dispersed islets were washed and suspended in culture
medium (RPMI-1640 containing 10% FCS) before being
used for transfection experiments.
Transfection
The day before transfection, neoplastic cells and the
primary fibroblasts were subcultured in 35 mm culture
dishes (5
10
5
cells/dish). Neoplastic cells as well as
the primary fibroblasts were rinsed once with 1 ml
Opti-MEM (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and
incubated for 5 h in Opti-MEM medium (1 ml/dish).
This medium contained no serum or antibiotics, but did
contain plasmid DNA (1 µg TRH-LUC reporter gene
DNA/dish) and lipofectamine reagent (Gibco-BRL)
(5 µg/dish) Dispersed islets were treated and transfected
for 5 h exactly as the cell lines except that higher doses of
lipofectamine were used (30 µg/dish). The medium was
then carefully removed, and the cells were incubated
overnight in complete medium containing 10% FCS. The
islets were rinsed twice with PBS and kept in serum-
free RPMI-1640 with 0·1% (w/v) BSA. T
3
or Dex was
added as concentrated sterile solutions. The medium was
not changed during the experiments to avoid repeated
exposure to hormone. Intra-experiment controls were
included in all experiments because the nutritional con-
ditions might change during the 48 h in culture. This
allowed comparison between islets exposed to hormone
(T
3
or Dex) and those exposed to the vehicle alone
(controls).
Cells were harvested, lysed and assayed for luciferase
and -galactosidase activities and protein content.
Luciferase assay
Luciferase activity was detected with
the Promega Luciferase assay system (Promega, Madison,
WI, USA). Light units were measured for 10 s with
a standard luminometer (Berthold Cliniluminometer,
Germany). Luciferase activity was normalized to the
protein concentration (light units/protein).
-Galactosidase assay
Transfection e
fficiency was
monitored in neoplastic cells (HIT T-15, RIN m5F, 3T3)
by cotransfection with CMV- -Gal ( -galactosidase ex-
pression vector linked to CMV promoter) and in primary
cells (islets and fibroblasts), by transfection of parallel dishes
with CMV- -Gal.
-Galactosidase
activity
was
assayed
using
2-
nitrophenyl- -
-galactopyranoside as substrate. Typically,
20 µl lysate was used in a 30 min assay.
Protein measurements
The protein concentrations were measured by Bradford’s
method (Bradford 1976).
Expression of results
Because protein concentrations of all extractions in
previous experiments have been found to be correlated
with
cotransfected
-galactosidase
activity,
relative
light units were monitored by quantification of protein
concentration, in lieu of -galactosidase for simplicity.
Histochemical staining for -galactosidase assay
Dispersed islets (groups of 200) transfected with the
pCMV- -Gal were harvested after 72 h, and the percent-
age of
-Gal-expressing cells was determined by
-galactosidase histochemical staining. Intact islets were
used in parallel to allow comparison (Saldeen et al. 1996).
The islets were washed twice in PBS, fixed in 2%
formaldehyde and 0·2% glutaraldehyde and washed again.
The fixed islets were incubated in a chromogenic solution
(5 mmol/l potassium ferricyanide, 5 mmol/l potassium
ferrocyanite, 2 mmol/l MgCl
2
and 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-
chloro-3-indolyl- -
-galactopyranoside) at 37 C for 24 h
after which they were washed twice and resuspended in
PBS. Cells staining deep blue-green were regarded as
positive and photographed.
Statistical analysis
The e
ffect of the hormones on luciferase activity was
compared by ANOVA using a one-factor model for
repeated measures. Di
fferences were considered signifi-
cant if P
<0·05. All data are expressed as means ..
Results
Three cell lines and primary fibroblasts were tested for the
basal activity of TRH-LUC expression vectors. The
luciferase activity of the reporter gene was expressed with
respect to protein concentration. Figure 2 shows the
relative luciferase activity of three TRH promoter con-
structs, normalized to the protein concentration. Each
TRH-LUC construct was transfected into HIT T-15,
RIN m5F and 3T3 cell lines and primary fibroblasts in
culture. To allow comparison of basal activities across cell
TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets ·
P FRAGNER
and others
93
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
lines, the relative luciferase activity of each TRH-LUC
construct has been compared with that of CMV-LUC as
maximum activity (i.e. to 100 in all cases). The luciferase
activity was about 8-fold higher in HIT T-15 and 3T3 cell
lines than in RIN m5F cells and primary fibroblasts.
Among the islet cell lines, the highest activity was always
found in HIT T-15 cells transfected with the TRH-LUC
(
242/+84) construct.
In pilot experiments HIT T-15 cells were transfected
with TRH-LUC constructs containing the fragments
554/+84,
242/+84 or
113/+84, to determine
the length of TRH promoter fragment needed to mediate
hormone regulation. Hormone (T
3
or Dex) was added to
the medium 24 h after the transfection for another 24 h.
The basal activity of all three TRH-LUC constructs
remained unchanged following exposure of the transfected
cells to T
3
(10
8
M, 24 h). In contrast, Dex (10
7
M)
increased the basal activity of both TRH-LUC (
554/
+84) and TRH-LUC (
242/+84) by 100%, while that
of TRH-LUC (
113/+84) remained unchanged (Fig.
3). Similar results were obtained with RIN m5F cells
transfected with TRH-LUC constructs of various lengths.
The transfection e
fficiency of dispersed islet cells was
compared with that of intact islets by histochemical
staining. Dispersed islet cells and intact islets were trans-
fected with the CMV- -Gal vector. Cells were harvested
3 days after transfection and
-Gal-positive cells assayed.
In
contrast
to
intact
islets,
very
poorly
stained,
lipofectamine-mediated transfection yielded an average of
29
8% -Gal-positive islet cells. Figure 4 shows a typical
histochemical staining of 20–25% -Gal-positive cells.
The e
ffects of T
3
and Dex on primary islet cells and
fibroblasts transfected with TRH-LUC (
242/+84)
construct were then tested. T
3
(24 h, 10
8
M) inhibited
the basal luciferase activities in the islet cells and primary
fibroblasts by 50%. In contrast, Dex (24 h, 10
7
M)
increased the basal luciferase activity of TRH-LUC by
100% but only in primary islet cells. Dex was without
e
ffect on the luciferase activity of transfected fibroblasts
(Fig. 5).
The specificity of the hormone regulation was deter-
mined by comparison with CMV-LUC vector activity
following normalization by protein concentration. T
3
and Dex did not a
ffect the basal luciferase activity of
CMV-LUC vector transfected into the primary islet cells
and fibroblasts (Fig. 5). Likewise, the cells transfected with
Figure 2 The basal activities of TRH-LUC constructs in neoplastic
cells (HIT T-15, RIN m5F and 3T3 cells) and primary fibroblasts.
Neoplastic cells and primary fibroblasts (5
10
5
cells/dish) were
transfected with the indicated TRH-LUC constructs (1 g/dish)
using lipofectamine (5 g/dish) for 5 h, in OPTI-MEM medium
without FCS or antibiotics. Cell lysates were assayed for luciferase
activity and protein content. The luciferase activity was normalized
to the protein content. The relative luciferase activity of each
TRH-LUC construct was compared with that of CMV-LUC. The
values are means
S.E.
of triplicate transfections in three
independent experiments. Results are similar following the
normalization of the data to the -Gal activity in cotransfected
neoplastic cells.
Figure 3 Regions of the TRH promoter mediating hormonal
regulation. The HIT T-15 cells (5
10
5
/dish) were transfected by
incubation for 5 h with the indicated TRH-LUC constructs
(1 g/dish) using lipofectamine (5 g/dish) in serum- and
antibiotic-free Opti-MEM medium. The medium was removed and
complete medium containing 10% FCS was added for 24 h. The
medium was again replaced with fresh serum-free medium
containing 0·1% BSA with or without hormone (T
3
(10
8
M), Dex
(10
7
M) or control (C)) for a further 24 h. Cells were then
harvested and cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity and
protein content. The relative basal activity of each TRH-LUC
construct was normalized to the protein content (arbitrary light
units/protein content). Data are means
S.E.
of at least three
independent experiments.
P FRAGNER
and others · TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets
94
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
the promoterless LUC vector displayed no activity in the
absence or presence of hormone (T
3
or Dex).
Discussion
This description of the pp-TRH promoter activity and its
hormonal regulation in the pancreatic islet cells compares
the e
ffects of T
3
and Dex on the basal activities of the
TRH promoter following the transient transfection of
neoplastic and primary islet cells with di
fferent promoter
sequences. The promoter constructs used do not possess
islet-cell specificity, since they can be expressed in islet
and non-islet (fibroblasts, 3T3) cells, as well as TRH
+
(fetal islets) and TRH
(HIT T-15 and RIN m5F) cells
Figure 4 -Galactosidase histochemical staining assay. Dispersed islet cells (equivalent
of 200 islets) were transfected with 1 g pCMV- -Gal, using 30 g lipofectamine.
In parallel, intact islets were used in the same experimental conditions, to allow
comparison. Cells were harvested 3 days later and stained for -galactosidase activity.
(a, b) Dispersed islets (magnification
200); (c) dispersed islets (magnification
400);
(d) intact islets. -Gal-positive cells are dark green-blue, whereas untransfected cells
are sometimes light green. Staining appears dark in the figure. -Gal-positive cells
represent 20–25% of the dispersed islet cells.
TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets ·
P FRAGNER
and others
95
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
derived from pancreatic islets. The basal activity in all cell
types tested suggests the presence of ubiquitous transcrip-
tion factors interacting with common basal promoter
elements. The data also suggest that there are suppressor
sequences in the TRH-LUC (
554/+84) construct,
which has less basal activity than TRH-LUC (
242/
+84). The promoter-proximal region was reported to
contain the DNA elements necessary for the inhibitory
regulation of the pp-TRH gene promoter by T
3
: deletion
analysis localized the element mediating the negative
regulation in the region between
83 and +46 and the
sequence between +12 and +46 was found to be essential
for inhibitory regulation by thyroid hormone (Balkan et al.
1998). However, because of low basal activity found in the
cell types used in the present study, the TRH-LUC
(
113/+84) construct was not appropriate to show the
negative regulation by T
3
.
The basal activity of the TRH promoter was greatest in
HIT T-15 cells, while RIN m5F cells had the lowest basal
activity. HIT T-15 cells transfected with TRH-LUC
constructs of di
fferent lengths were exposed to T
3
and
Dex to compare the hormonal regulation of the TRH
promoter. As shown in Fig. 3, only TRH-LUC (
554/
+84) and TRH-LUC (
242/+84) were hormone-
sensitive, while TRH-LUC (
113/+84) was not.
Moreover, TRH-LUC (
242/+84) displays higher
level of expression than TRH-LUC (
554/+84); there-
fore it was selected as the most appropriate construct for
showing the hormonal regulation of the TRH promoter.
The comparison of the transfection e
fficiency in primary
and neoplastic islet cells was concluded following normal-
ization of the luciferase activity to the cell protein content.
For a given amount of protein, the luciferase activity was
4- to 5-fold lower in primary islet cells than in primary
fibroblasts or in neoplastic cells. This lower activity is due,
at least in part, to the percent of cells which are e
ffectively
transfected. As visualized by immunostaining in Fig. 4,
only 25% of dispersed islet cells are -Gal-positive.
Compared with neoplastic cells, islet cells were thus
transfected with higher doses of lipofectamine. DNA/
lipofectamine ratio was 1:30 in all transfections of dis-
persed islet cells with approximately 200 islets (equivalent
of 3–5
10
5
cells/2 ml per dish). This appeared to give
the optimal transfection e
fficiency without any significant
cytotoxic e
ffect as evidenced by the unaffected cell protein
contents 3 days after transfection. It can not be excluded,
however, that part of the islet cells were lost before the
transfection, following the trypsination of the intact islets.
Nevertheless, the dispersed islet cells are more easily
transfected than the cells of intact islets. This is probably
because more cells are exposed to the transfection agents
after dispersion.
The principal finding of this study is that the promoter
is influenced di
fferently by T
3
and Dex. T
3
inhibits and
Dex stimulates the luciferase activity of TRH-LUC
(
242/+84). To rule out any potential vector-mediated
artifact (Lopez et al. 1993, Maia et al. 1996) and
to demonstrate the specificity of the regulation of the
pp-TRH promoter construct, we also used the CMV
promoter in a CMV-LUC construct as well as a pro-
moterless vector. In contrast to the promoterless vector,
CMV-LUC displays high luciferase activity in primary
and neoplastic islet and non-islet cells, but both are
insensitive to T
3
and Dex. Our data demonstrate that the
negative regulation by T
3
is restricted to primary cells
(islets and fibroblasts). There was no change in the basal
Figure 5 Changes in rat TRH promoter activity in transfected islet
cells by T
3
and Dex. Fetal islets were prepared, cultured and
dispersed. Dispersed islets (equivalent of 200 islets or 3–5
10
5
cells/dish) were transferred to serum- and antibiotic-free
Opti-MEM medium containing lipofectamine (30 g/dish) and
transfected by incubation for 5 h with plasmid TRH-LUC
(
242/
+84) (1 g/dish). Pancreatic fibroblasts (5 10
5
cells/dish) were also transfected with the same construct
(1 g/dish), and lipofectamine (5 g/dish). The medium was
removed and complete medium containing 10% FCS was added
for 18 h. The medium was again replaced with fresh serum-free
medium containing 0·1% BSA, with or without T
3
(10
8
M) or
Dex (10
7
M) for a further 24 h. Islet cells and fibroblasts were
harvested, lysed and assayed for luciferase activity (arbitrary light
units) under basal conditions (no hormone) or after incubation
with T
3
or Dex. The activity of 50 ng control plasmid CMV-LUC
was also measured under basal conditions and after T
3
or Dex
treatment. The luciferase activities were normalized to the protein
concentrations. The changes in luciferase activity following T
3
and
Dex treatment are reported as the ratio to basal luciferase activity
(100%).
P FRAGNER
and others · TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets
96
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
activities of any TRH-LUC construct following transfec-
tion with neoplastic cells (HIT T-15, RIN m5F or 3T3).
In contrast, Dex increases TRH-LUC (
242/+84)
activity in primary islet cells and neoplastic cells of islets.
The synthetic glucocorticoid has no e
ffect on non-islet
cells (primary fibroblasts or 3T3 cells).
The pp-TRH gene belongs to the family of T
3
-
responsive genes that includes
- and
-subunits of the
TSH gene and epidermal growth factor receptor gene,
whose expression is negatively regulated by T
3
at the level
of gene transcription (Lezoualc’h et al. 1992). T
3
inhibition
of pp-TRH gene promoter requires the thyroid receptor
(TR)–T
3
complex and an additional co-suppressor
protein, which may form a bridge between the TR–T
3
complex and the transcription initiation complex (Feng
et al. 1994, Li et al. 1996, Satoh et al. 1996). T
3
receptor is
present at very low levels, even in highly responsive cells.
Interactions of the receptor with specific DNA sequences
can only be examined using partially purified and concen-
trated receptor. It has been reported that a thyroid
hormone-response element of the insulin gene enhancer
responds to thyroid hormone in COS-7 cells bearing the
nuclear TR, but not in HIT T-15 cells (Clark et al. 1995).
Cotransfection with TR was often a prerequisite for
T
3
-responsiveness of cells transfected with TRH promoter
constructs (Höllenberg et al. 1995). The activity of the
sequence also depends on the relative concentrations of
other unknown transcription factors. Our results indicate
that T
3
may inhibit TRH promoter activity, at least in
primary islets and fibroblasts that possess T
3
receptor sites
(Lee et al. 1989). Our previous results already indicated
changes in the steady-state concentrations of pp-TRH
mRNA and TRH. However, these changes may be due
to changes in pp-TRH mRNA stability or in transcrip-
tional activity. The present results mirror the changes in
pp-TRH mRNA: the T
3
-dependent inhibition of TRH
gene expression in cultured islets is of the same magnitude
(50%) as the decrease in the promoter activity in the
presence of T
3
. Our data are also consistent with
the results obtained in vivo on hypothyroid rats where the
steady-state concentrations of islets pp-TRH mRNA and
TRH contents markedly increase, and T
3
replacement
restores the euthyroid levels. Taken together, the consist-
ency of the changes obtained by di
fferent approaches
makes it highly unlikely that these are artifacts produced
by transfection experiments and indicates that the hor-
mone first regulates pp-TRH transcription. The initial
impact should produce a cascade of inhibition of the
messenger, content, and secretion of TRH (Wolf et al.
1984, Aratan-Spire et al. 1984b, Fragner et al. 1998, 1999).
The regulation by Dex of the pp-TRH promoter
activity contrasts with the action of T
3
. The glucocorticoid
receptor is present in the pancreatic -cells (Fischer et al.
1990, Delaunay et al. 1997). Dex stimulates the luciferase
activity of TRH-LUC (
242/+84) in primary islet cells
and cell lines derived from pancreatic islets. It is without
e
ffect on the same construct in the primary fibroblasts and
3T3 cells.
As for the T
3
e
ffect, Dex-associated regulation was
assayed on TRH-LUC (
242/+84) construct, which
contains GRE sequence. Previous studies examining glu-
cocorticoid regulation of the rat TRH promoter demon-
strated that the sequence at
200 of the rat TRH gene
can bind to glucocorticoid receptors in vitro. Also, transient
transfection studies in a cell line containing endogenous
glucocorticoid receptors demonstrated a 4- to 6-fold
stimulation by Dex (Lee et al. 1989, Stevenin & Lee
1995). As expected, TRH-LUC (
113/+84) construct
lacking GRE sequence was not sensitive to the Dex e
ffect.
Taken together these data suggest that as for other
glucocorticoid-responsive genes in the islets (Jamal et al.
1991, Hamamdzic et al. 1995, Khan et al. 1995), Dex
regulates pp-TRH promoter activity after binding to islet
glucocorticoid receptors which then interact with the
GRE sequence. The hormonal regulation of pp-TRH
promoter appears not to be islet cell-specific, since the
pp-TRH promoter in hypothalamic neurons is also
negatively regulated by T
3
(Lezoualc’h et al. 1992); like-
wise, T
3
inhibits while Dex stimulates pp-TRH promoter
activity in rat embryonic cardiomyocytes (Shi et al. 1997).
In summary, data obtained using fetal islets raise the
possibility that age-dependent decrease in TRH gene
expression is due, at least in part, to extra-insular (hormo-
nal) events. The molecular mechanism of how transcrip-
tion is regulated and factors involved in this event remain
to be elucidated.
References
Aratan-Spire S, Wolf B & Czernichow P 1984a E
ffects of hypo- and
hyperthyroidism on pancreatic TRH-degrading activity and TRH
concentrations in developing rat pancreas. Acta Endocrinologica 106
209–214.
Aratan-Spire S, Wolf B, Portha B, Bailbé D & Czernichow P 1984 b
Streptozotocin treatment at birth induces a parallel depletion of
thyrotropin-releasing hormone and insulin in the rat pancreas
during development. Endocrinology 114 2369–2373.
Aratan-Spire S, Scharfmann R, Lechan RM, Armen H & Tashjian J
1990 proTRH gene expression by fetal pancreatic islets in
culture. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 168
952–958.
Balkan W, Tavianini MA, Gkonos P & Roos BA 1998 Expression of
rat thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) gene in TRH-producing
tissues of transgenic mice requires sequences located in exon 1.
Endocrinology 139 252–259.
Boler J, Enzman F, Folkers K, Bowers CY & Schally AV 1969 The
identity of chemical and hormonal properties of the thyrotropin-
releasing hormone and pyroglutamyl-histidyl-proline amide.
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 37 705–710.
Bradford M 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification
of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of
protein-dye binding. Annals of Biochemistry 72 248–254.
Bruhn TO, Bolduc TG, Rondeel JMM & Jackson IMD 1994
Thyrotropin-releasing hormone gene expression in the anterior
pituitary. II. Stimulation by glucocorticoids. Endocrinology 134
821–825.
TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets ·
P FRAGNER
and others
97
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
Burgus R, Dunn TF, Desiderio D & Guillemin R 1969 Structure
moléculaire du facteur hypothalamique hypophysiotrope TRF
d’origine ovine: mise en évidence par spectrométrie de masse de la
séquence PGA-His-ProNH2. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des
Sciences (Paris) D 269 1870–1873.
Clark AR, Wilson ME, London NJM, James RFL & Docherty K
1995 Identification and characterization of a functional retinoic
acid/thyroid hormone-response element upstream of the human
insulin gene enhancer. Biochemical Journal 309 863–870.
Delaunay F, Khan A, Cintra A, Davani B, Ling Z-C, Andersson A,
Östenson C-G, Gusta
ffson JA, Efendic S & Okret S 1997
Pancreatic
cells are important targets for the diabetogenic e
ffects
of glucocorticoids. Journal of Clinical Investigation 100 2094–2098.
Ebiou J-C, Bulant M, Nicolas P & Aratan-Spire S 1992 a Pattern of
thyrotropin-releasing hormone secretion from the adult and neonatal
rat pancreas. Comparison with insulin secretion. Endocrinology 130
1371–1380.
Ebiou JC, Grouselle D & Aratan-Spire S 1992b Antithyrotropin-
releasing hormone serum inhibits secretion of glucagon from isolated
perfused rat pancreas: an experimental model for positive feedback
regulation of glucagon secretion. Endocrinology 131 765–771.
Feng P, Li QL, Satoh T & Wilber JF 1994 Ligand (T3) dependent
and independent e
ffects of thyroid hormone receptors upon human
TRH gene transcription in neuroblastoma cells. Biochemistry and
Biophysical Research Communications 200 171–177.
Fischer B, Rausch U, Wollny P, Westphal H, Seitz J & Aumuller G
1990 Immunohistochemical localization of the glucocorticoid
receptor in pancreatic -cells of the rat. Endocrinology 126
2635–2641.
Fragner P, Presset O, Bernad N, Martinez J & Aratan-Spire S 1997 A
new biological contribution of cyclo(His-Pro) to the peripheral
inhibition of pancreatic secretion. American Journal of Physiology 273
(Endocrinology and Metabolism 36) E1127–E1132.
Fragner P, Quette J & Aratan-Spire S 1998 Thyroid status and the
regulation of thyrotropin-releasing hormone synthesis in rat
pancreatic islets. Comparison with insulin regulation. Biochemical and
Biophysical Research Communications 247 564–568.
Fragner P, Ladram A & Aratan de Leon S 1999 Triiodothyronine
down-regulates TRH synthesis and decreases pTRH(160–169) and
insulin release from fetal rat islets in culture Endocrinology 140
4113–4119.
Hamamdzic D, Duzic E, Sherlock JD & Lanier SM 1995 Regulation
of -adrenergic receptor expression and signaling in pancreatic
-cells. American Journal of Physiology 269 E161–-E171.
Hellerström C, Lewis NJ, Borg H, Johnson R & Freinkel 1979
Method for large-scale isolation of pancreatic islets by tissue culture
of fetal rat pancreas. Diabetes 28 769–776.
Höllenberg AN, Monden T, Flynn TR, Boers M-E, Cohen O &
Wondisford FE 1995 The human thyrotropin-releasing hormone
gene is regulated by thyroid hormone through two distinct classes
of negative thyroid hormone response elements. Molecular
Endocrinology 9 540–550.
Jamal H, Jones PM, Byrne J, Suda K, Gatei MA, Knase SM &
Bloom SR 1991 Peptide contents of neuropeptide Y, vasoactive
intestinal polypeptide, and -calcitonin gene-related peptide and
their messenger ribonucleic acids after dexamethasone treatment in
the isolated rat islets of Langerhans. Endocrinology 129 3372–3380.
Khan A, Hong-Lie C & Landau BR 1995 Glucose-6-phosphatase
activity in islets from ob/ob and lean mice and the e
ffect of
dexamethasone. Endocrinology 136 1934–1938.
Leduque P, Aratan-Spire S, Czernichow P & Dubois PM 1986
Ontogenesis of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in the human fetal
pancreas. Journal of Clinical Investigation 78 1028–1034.
Leduque P, Aratan-Spire S, Wolf B, Dubois P & Czernichow P 1987
Localization of thyrotropin-releasing hormone- and insulin-
immunoreactivity in the pancreas of neonatal rats after injection of
streptozotocin at birth. Cell and Tissue Research 248 89–94.
Leduque P, Aratan-Spire S, Scharfmann R, Basmaciogullari A,
Czernichow P & Dubois PM 1989 Coexistence of thyrotropin-
releasing hormone and insulin in cultured fetal rat islets: a light and
electron microscopic immunocytochemical study during islet
neoformation. Biology of the Cell 66 291–296.
Lee JT, Lebenthal E & Lee P-C 1989 Rat pancreatic nuclear thyroid
hormone receptor: characterization and postnatal development.
Gastroenterology 96 1151–1157.
Lee SL, Stewart K & Goodman RH 1988 Structure of gene encoding
rat thyrotropin releasing hormone. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263
16604–16609.
Lezoualc’h F, Hassan AHS, Giraud P, Loe
ffler J-P, Lee S &
Demeneix BA 1992 Assignment of the -thyroid hormone receptor
to 3,5,3 -triiodothyronine-dependent inhibition of transcription
from the thyrotropin-releasing hormone promoter in chick
hypothalamic neurons. Molecular Endocrinology 6 1797–1802.
Li QI, Feng P, Koch C, Shi ZH & Wilber JF 1996 Reversal of
TR-T3 inhibition of the hTRH gene by excess TR ligand-
binding domain: evidence for novel accessory protein. Thyroid 6
233–236.
Lopez GF, Schaufele F, Webb P, Holloway JM, Baxter JD & Kushner
PJ 1993 Positive and negative modulation of jun action by thyroid
hormone receptor at a unique AP1 site. Molecular and Cellular
Biology 13 3042–3049.
Maia AL, Harney JW & Larsen PR 1996 Is there a negative TRE in
the luciferase reporter cDNA? Thyroid 6 325–328.
Saldeen J, Curiel DT, Eizirik DL, Andersson A, Strandell E, Buschard
K & Welsh N 1996 E
fficient gene transfer to dispersed human
pancreatic islet cells in vitro using adenovirus-polylysine/DNA
complexes or polycationic liposomes. Diabetes 45 1197–1203.
Satoh T, Yamada M, Iwasaki T & Mori M 1996 The regulation of
the gene for the preprothyrotropin-releasing hormone from the
mouse by thyroid hormone requires additional factors in
conjunction with thyroid hormone receptors. Journal of Biological
Chemistry 271 27919–27926.
Scharfmann R, Leduque P, Aratan-Spire S, Dubois P, Basmaciogullari
A & Czernichow P 1988 Persistence of peptidylglycine -amidating
monooxygenase activity and elevated thyrotropin-releasing hormone
concentrations in fetal rat islets in culture. Endocrinology 123
1329–1334.
Shi ZX, Xu W, Selmano
ff MK & Wilber JF 1997 Serotonin (5-HT)
stimulates thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) gene transcription
in rat embryonic cardiomyocytes. Endocrine 6 153–158.
Stevenin B & Lee SL 1995 Hormonal regulation of the thyrotropin-
releasing hormone (TRH) gene. Endocrinologist 5 286–296.
Tavianini MA, Gkonos PJ, Lampe TH & Roos BA 1989
Dexamethasone stimulates thyrotropin-releasing hormone
production in a C cell line. Molecular Endocrinology 3 605–610.
Wolf B, Aratan-Spire S & Czernichow P 1984 Hypothyroidism
increases pancreatic thyrotropin-releasing hormone concentrations in
adult rats. Endocrinology 114 1334–1337.
Wood W, Kao M, Gordon D & Ridgway EC 1989 Thyroid hormone
regulates the mouse thyrotropin B-subunit gene promoter in
transfected primary thyrotropes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 264
14840–14847.
Yamada M., Saga Y, Shibusawa N, Hirato J, Muradami M, Iwasaki
T, Hashimoto K, Satof T, Wakabayashi K, Taketo MM & Mori M
1997 Tertiary hypothyroidism and hyperglycemia in mice with
targeted disruption of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone gene.
PNAS 94 10862–10867.
Revised manuscript received 13 February 2001
Accepted 1 March 2001
P FRAGNER
and others · TRH promoter is inhibited by T
3
and stimulated by Dex in pancreatic islets
98
www.endocrinology.org
Journal of Endocrinology (2001) 170, 91–98
Dostları ilə paylaş: |