Power distribution R&D for atlas slhc upgrades Maurice Garcia-Sciveres
Power distribution R&D
for ATLAS sLHC upgrades
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
SiD tracking meeting
Problem of “long” distance electrical power distribution is not new
The novelty is that “long” is getting shorter
The relevant distance scale turns out to
be the load operating voltage
Wrong units? Voltage is driven by oxide thickness inside the IC: units of length.
=> Miniaturization inside IC also affects distances outside IC!
Eventually all power distribution distances become “long” => can only be solved at IC level
ATLAS pixel detector cable plant
Built in the traditional way
Scaling from present pixel detector with same cable plant down to PP2
Options well known,
Once accepted that we are dealing with long distance power transmission
Most ideas discussed today can be found in patents filed by Tesla well before 1900.
There is a combined ATLAS R&D proposal:
SP demonstrator pixel modules have been produced at Bonn some time ago
Plan to make realistic serial power stave
prototype in the near term
SCT implementing serial power with external regulators
More recent but also more prototyping work in SCT at present (RAL, LBNL)
Switched capacitor development at LBL
2 version of ASIC submitted 1 month ago
This should produce a real regulator ready to power SCT stave prototypes and pixel modules but late summer.
Magnetic “buck” converter
Work started by Satish Dawn of Yale >1 year ago. Evaluate commercial parts and options for industry partnership
Parallel effort started at CERN in 2006. Significant manpower. Plan is to design a magnetic regulator controller and build a regulator from the ground up
Need to evaluate AC magnetic field issues.
Why switched capacitors?
Commercial DC-DC down-converters for power applications are all inductive.
(Switched capacitors used to step-up voltage
at low power to drive displays
Why then study switched capacitors for power?
Cannot use ferrites in magnetic field => performance penalty for magnetic converters
Fringe AC magnetic fields may produce pickup in detectors (must study case-by-case)
Ceramic capacitor miniaturization makes great advances year after year (air-core inductors cannot be improved).
Over-voltage safety considerations
Switched capacitor credits
IC design: Peter Denes
Simulation: Bob Ely, Peter Denes
Testing (so far only first prototype): Bob Ely, Seung Ji,
, M. Garcia-Sciveres
Test configuration used: divide-by-4 stack
Phase 1 - Charge
Many capacitor arrangements are possible with different advantages
Minimum number of capacitors for a given ratio (less than for stack)
Minimum voltage drop across switches (more than for stack), etc.
Problem has been solved in general: Makowski, D. Maksimovic, "Performance limits of switched
capacitor DC-DC converters
," IEEE PESC, 1995 Record, pp. 12151221)
First prototype test chip
50V (s-d) 0.35m HV CMOS process
Minimum size (adequate for ~100mA)
Switch transistors only- no auxiliary circuitry
Learned about process simulation, radiation hardness,
and bulk isolation
Did not work as a useful converter due to bulk isolation problems
Results presented at 12th Workshop on Electronics for LHC and Future Experiments, http://ific.uv.es/lecc06/
HV Transistor characteristics after irradiation
The most important result is that the drain source resistance has increased by about 10%
Measured Rds also exceeded model predictions even before irradiation.
=> Increased switch size.
Same 50V 0.35m HV CMOS process
Submitted February 2007 (expected back in May)
Sized for 1A output. 4.3 x 4.9 mm
Contains auxiliary circuits.
All capacitors external
Top level schematic
Simulation results 1
Simulation results 2
Simulation results 3
Serial power vs. DC-DC trade-offs
Both increase power at/near the module by a similar amount
Serial power is in principle less massive because regulators can be built into chips.
SP naturally rad-hard if regulators built into chips. DC-DC not yet rad-hard enough
DC-DC can be an off-the-shelf solution. A given converter can be used in several applications
With SP the detector basic unit is a super-module. With DC-DC the basic unit is still a module.
individual module control is simple with DC-DC, not with SP. With DC-DC module voltages are adjustable- not easily with SP.
Both reduce copper mass by same amount. SP also reduces the cable count bu default. DC-DC allows trade-off between cable count and control granularity.
Regulators can be external or inside readout chips
Production pixel readout chips already have internal regulators built-in (but not used).
This shows that the serial power pixel R&D has a long history by now
Why is there no conductive interference (noise) between serial powered modules?
Serial-powered strip sensors
Serial power references
Powering has become a hot topic with lots of work going on
Expect usable prototype DC-DC converters by year’s end
Focus tends to be on powering existing chips, because that’s
what people can make tests on
at the source (chip) has NOT YET received nearly as much attention within HEP. It should
How do we reduce the analog current keeping good performance?
How do we reduce the digital current?
An extreme is stacked logic domains- serial power inside the chip. Reference: http://www.bioee.ee.columbia.edu/
Less aggressive approaches are possible. I/O protocol. Clock distribution. Architecture.
event -> Maraq ifadəSİ ÜÇÜn müraciƏT
event -> Stakeholder management and
event -> Тренинг «Психология управления временем
event -> GöZƏLLİK İnsanin daxiLİNDƏDİR
Dostları ilə paylaş:
Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2017