Правила оформления текста рукописи

Submission, review and publication guidelines for the journal

“Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy”.

Formatting the text and list of references (sample).
UDC 165.0

I. I. Ivanov

Novosibirsk State University

2, Pirogova st., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

[e-mail]
NATURALISTIC TURN: PUTTING METAPHYSICS FIRST
The paper aims to illustrate one of the main features of the naturalistic turn – overcoming of the sceptic’s challenge by «putting metaphysics first» (M. Devitt). The sceptic’s argument is viewed as a consequence of the wrong direction of thought from a priori epistemology and/or semantics to a priori metaphysics. The naturalistic turn gives us a chance to give up the sceptic’s argumentation by allowing to argue from empirical metaphysics to empirical epistemology and/or semantics. Various examples of the advantage of the naturalized view are given. In particular, it is shown how to avoid scepticism, which is a follow-up of the indetermination and underdetermination problems and constructivist ideology.

Keywords: naturalistic turn, scepticism, semantic priority, underdetermination, constructivism, realism.
The main text of the article. Bibliographic references are formatted as follows: books, articles – [Rawls, 1995], citations – [Horton, 2006. P. 427]. The text of the article may contain footnotes at the bottom of the page, with numbers starting with 1. For example, …¹. The second example². Links to Internet sources can also be used as footnotes, for example³. The text of the article may contain the dash of one kind only, the so-called “short dash” (keys combination: CTRL + Num-). As a punctuation mark the dash requires spaces on both sides, if it denotes an interval the dash requires no blank spaces (2–3, 1920–1940; but with a commentary: end of 1920 – beginning of 1921.).

References

Aach J. Psychologism Reconsidered: A Revaluation of the Arguments of Frege and Husserl. Synthese, 1990, vol. 85, p. 315–338.

Benacerraf P. Tasks, Super-Tasks and the Modern Eleatics. Zeno’s Paradoxes. W. C. Salmon (ed.). Indianapolis, USA; Cambridge, Hackett Publ. Company, 2001, P. 103–129.

Goran V. P. Istoricheskie istoki khristianskoi dogmy o sotvorenii mira «iz nichego» [Historical Origins of The Christian Dogma of Creation of The World From Nothing]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 2014, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 123–132. (In Russ.)

Karpovich V.N. Terminy v strukture teorii [Terms in the Theory Structure]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1978. (In Russ.)

Tselishchev V. V. Ratsionalisticheskii optimizm i filosofiya Kurta Gedelya [Rationalistical Optimism and the Philosophy of Kurt Godel]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2013, no. 8, p. 12–23. (In Russ.)

Davidson D. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 1974, vol. 47, p. 5–20.

Rorty R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1979.

Information about authors

Ivanov Ivan Ivanovich – Ph.D., Associiate professor, Novosibirsk State University, 630090, 2 Pirogova Str., Novosibirsk, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology; work phone: [phone], e-mail: [e-mail]

1 We agree here with V.E. Petrov’s opinion [Petrov, 2002. P. 111].

2 A detailed analysis of the approach see in [Rorty, 1979].

3 See: Husserl E. Philosophy as Rigorous Science // URL: http://www.philosophy.ru/library/husserl/ gus_fil.html. Date of access: 11.09.2001