33
International RILEM Conference on Materials, Systems and Structures in Civil Engineering
Conference segment on Service Life of Cement-Based Materials and Structures
22-24 August 2016, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Monte Carlo simulation was used to simulate the limit state function and to calculate the
probability of corrosion initiation using Eqs. (4) and (5) for the statistical characteristics of
random variables given in Tab. 1. In this study, 10
6
simulations were performed using Matlab
software to calculate the probability of corrosion initiation. The probability of corrosion
initiation versus time (years) was plotted, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Probability of corrosion initiation versus time
4.2
Determination of carbonation depths on-site
Initially, the location of the reinforcement was identified, and 10 holes were chiselled into the
concrete, as marked in Figure 3. The phenolphthalein test was carried out on site to measure
carbonation depths. Tab. 2 shows the mean carbonation depths measured at test locations in
each console, as indicated in Figure 3. The test locations ((a) to (j)) are chosen, about 22 cm
from the closet edge. Test locations (a) to (e) are considered as sheltered from rain, whereas
locations (f) to (j) are considered as partially exposed to rain.
110cm
22cm
55cm
22cm
(a)
(b)
(a)
(c)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(a)Front of a console
(b)Back of a console
110cm
(c)
(h)
(e)
(d)
(j)
(i)
55cm
Sheltered from rain
Partially exposed to rain
Sheltered from rain
Partially exposed to rain
Figure 3: Sampling point of a console
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reliability Index
Pr
obability of corr
osion
initiation(%
)
Time ( years)
Corrosion initiation
(sheltered from rain)
Corrosion
initiation(partially
exposed to rain)
34
International RILEM Conference on Materials, Systems and Structures in Civil Engineering
Conference segment on Service Life of Cement-Based Materials and Structures
22-24 August 2016, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Table 2: Mean carbonation depth at locations given in Figure 2
Mean carbonation depth at locations shown in Figure 3
Sheltered from rain
Partially exposed to rain
Location (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Console 1 (mm)
7 7
6
10
7
2
4
6
7
4
Console 2 (mm)
5 7
8
5
7
3
3
4
5
4
Console 3 (mm)
6 8
10
5
7
3
5
8
6
4
4.3 Half-cell potential (HCP) mapping
Half-cell potential mapping (HCP) is a non-destructive method, which is widely used for
monitoring steel corrosion in concrete structures. However, there are no specific guidelines
available in the literature to interpret HCP measurements due to carbonation. According to
ASTM (1991) Standard [8], the results from a potential mapping process can be interpreted as
shown in Tab. 3, which is based on the findings from laboratory testing (partial immersion in
chloride solution) and outdoor exposure of various reinforced concretes structures above
ground level. The standard states that criterion given in Tab. 3 should not be utilized if
concrete is carbonated to the level of the embedded steel, unless either experience or
destructive examination of some areas, or both, suggest their applicability. Considering
measured carbonation depths (i.e. destructive examination) in Tab. 2, it can be seen that
concrete is not carbonated to the level of embedded steel. This is because the average concrete
cover to the reinforcement (25 mm) is deeper than the measured carbonated depths.
Considering that fact, Tab. 3 was used to evaluate HCP values due to carbonation
.
At 53
years
of service life, the three consoles had 36 HCP measurements taken at 200 mm intervals
over each of their surfaces, using Cu/CuSO4 as reference electrode. Figure 4 shows the HCP
measurement over the surface of Console 2 as an example.
Table 3: Interpretation of half-cell potential values as per ASTM C876 [8]
Half-cell potential (mV) relative to
Cu/CuSO
4
reference electrode (HCP)
percentage chance of active corrosion
<-350 >
90%
-300 to -200
50%
>-200
Less than 10%
5.
Comparison of calculated values with field measurements
5.1 Comparison of measured and calculated carbonation depths
Considering the mean value of each random variable in Eq. (1) and Tab. 2, the mean value of
the carbonation depths vs time have been plotted as given in Figure 4 for the area sheltered
from rain and the area partially exposed to rain. It can be seen that, at 53 years, the calculated
mean value of the carbonation depth is 18 mm for the area sheltered from rain, which is
higher than the measured average carbonation depth (X1=7 mm). For the locations in the area
which is partially exposed to rain, the calculated mean carbonation depth is 8.7 mm, which is
also higher than the measured carbonation depth (X2=4.5 mm, as shown in Figure 5).
However, both measured and calculated carbonation depths are below the mean value of