Projet Bassins Versants



Yüklə 347,71 Kb.
səhifə3/6
tarix18.04.2018
ölçüsü347,71 Kb.
#39345
1   2   3   4   5   6




  1. The next implementation progress review mission is proposed to take place on October 2 -22, 2011.





Annex A
List of people met


  1. Shavkat Hamraev, Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Water Resources

  2. Asatilla Salimov, Deputy Minister of Economy

  3. Bakhtiyar Yusupov, Technical Director, PIU on Water Projects, MAWR

  4. Bakhadir Yusupov, Project Manager, Ferghana Valley Water Resources Management Project, Phase-1

  5. Satimbay Yuldashev, Head of PIU on Silk project, Nukus

  6. Kilichbek Sitniyazov, Chief Accountant, Silk PIU

  7. Gulnara Embergenova, Director, NGO “Zolotoe Naslediye Arala”

  8. Maryam Kurshaeva, Head of RC in Tortkul district Karakalpakstan

  9. Khaitjan Yuldashev, Head of RC in Khojeili district, Karakalpakstan

  10. SalavatJarkinbaev, Chief Accountant, Bustan OTP, Karakalpakstan

  11. Atakhan Saburov, Farmer, Nursery garden of mulberry trees, Ellikkala district

  12. Palwan Kulumbetov, Deputy Director of PIU, Beruni district

  13. Reyimbay Kuranbaev, Agricultural specialist, PIU, Beruni district

  14. Dinesh Kumar Shrestha, Consultant, Resident Engineer, Mott MacDonald/Temelsu

  15. Bahadir Boz, Consultant, Mott MacDonald/Temelsu

  16. Robert Davey, Consultant, WUA, Water Management, Agriculture & Institutional Development Coordinator, Mott MacDonald/Temelsu

  17. Stefan Rosenow, M&E Consultant, Agro-Economist Project Management, AHT Group AG

  18. Bahadir Alimov, Concortsium Manager, OAO “Amubukharakanalkurilish”

  19. Shahobiddin Bahronov, Concortsium Manager, OAO “Amubukharakanalkurilish”

  20. Oblakul Akbarov, Concortsium Manager, OOO “TupalangduvGESkurilish”

  21. Merom Kutlimuratov, Chairman, “Shabbaz” rural community

  22. Zaripbay Jumatov, Manager, WUA “Shabbaz”

  23. Erkabay Masharapov, Hydrotechnic specialist, WUA “Shabbaz”

  24. Bahrom Jabbarov, Specialist, Mott MacDonald/Temelsu

  25. Murat Kurbanov, Inspector, “Baday Tugai” State Nature Reserve

  26. M. Narbaev, I&D Engineer, PIU

  27. M. Utemuradov, Procurement Specialist, PIU

  28. V. Sablina, Financial Specialist, PIU

  29. I. Zuberova, Accountant, PIU

  30. A. Ganiev, Deputy Manager, PIU

  31. M. Astankulov, Civil works Engineer, PIU

  32. K. Urinbaev, Monitoring Engineer, PIU

  33. A. Alimov, Office Manager, PIU

  34. M. Supiev, Sociologist, PIU

  35. Shuhrat Ganiev, First Deputy Khokim, Ferghana region

  36. A. Rahmatullaev, Head of BAIS “Syrdarya-Soh”

  37. P. Rasulov, First Deputy Head of BAIS “Syrdarya-Soh”

  38. R. Yakubov, Headof department on PS, Energy and communication

  39. Yu. Ahrarov, Head of administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Isfayram-Shahimardan”

  40. N. Masharapov, Head of land cadastre department

  41. J. Saymatov, Head of division on water use

  42. M. Zailapov, Head of division, PTO

  43. Bohodir Yusupov, Khokim of Namangan region

  44. B. Ohunov, Head of BAIS “Norin-Syrdarya” “Podshoota-Shodak”

  45. B. Khoshimov, First Deputy head of BAIS “Norin-Syrdarya”

  46. B. Abzalov, Headof department on PS, Energy and Communication

  47. A. Boyhanov, Khokim of Chartak district

  48. I. Imanov, administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Podshoota-Shodak”

  49. N. Hudoyberdiev, Head of division on PTO, administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Podshoota-Shodak”

  50. Ulugbek Rakhimov, Deputy of Khokim of Andijan region on agricultural issues

  51. A. Abdullaev, Head of BAIS “Norin-Koradarya”

  52. Sh. Ergashev, First Deputy head of BAIS “Norin-Koradarya”

  53. M. Ismailov, Head of department on PS, Energy and Communication

  54. A. Bahramov, Head of administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Savay-Akbursay”

  55. U. Yokubov, Head of administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Shahrihonsay”

  56. B. Boltoboev, Head of administration of irrigation systems (AIS) “Ulugnor-Mazgilsay”

  57. R. Ermatov, Head of division on water use

  58. Kh. Uraimov, Head of PTO, administration of irrigation systems

  59. G. Abdullaev, Lead specialist, administration of irrigation systems

  60. Begdulla Davletiyarov (M&E Environmental Specialist)

  61. Bakhadir Kamalov Office Manager, JV Mott MacDonald – Temelsu

  62. Plamen Bozakov, Deputy Country Director, ADB

  63. Ramil Maharramov, Country Manager, IDB

  64. Davron Madirimov, Field Representative in Uzbekistan, IDB

  65. Maor Zrahyahu, First Secretary and Consul, Embassy of Israel

  66. Murat Mirzaev, Deputy Head, SECO



Annex B




Results Framework and Monitoring Indicators




Hierarchy of Objectives

Key Performance Indicators

Status as of end of 2009 (updated data for March 2011 provided for selected indicators when available)

Sector Related CAS Goals


Maintain and improve the efficiency of the country’s extensive irrigation and drainage infrastructure.


Remove distortions and create incentives for increasing farm productivity to address and reduce the rural poverty.

Sector Indicators



Contribution to agricultural GDP from irrigated lands.





The extent of irrigated areas and increased farm productivity.

Rural poverty indicators particularly in Karakalpakstan.



Data collection in process


Data collection in process

Project Development Objective


1. To increase the productivity of irrigated agriculture, employment and incomes in Karakalpakstan, one of the poorest regions in Central Asia







2. To improve water quality of the Amu Darya river by safe disposal of the drainage effluent, and enhance quality of wetlands in the Amu Darya delta.














3. To develop the institutions for improving water management, operation and maintenance (O&M) of the irrigation and drainage systems, and for promoting sustainable irrigated agriculture through participatory irrigation management.








Outcome /Impact Indicators



1. Sustained crop production in South Karakalpakstan on about 115,000 ha in Beruni and Turtkul Tumans on about 65,000 ha of irrigated lands yield increases of 10 – 20% by Yr 7 and, in conjunction with the RESP, provision for main system irrigation and drainage improvements in Ellikala Tuman for another 34,000 ha, resulting in similar yield increases.


2.1. Reduction in salinity of Amu Darya water by about 0.05g/l, resulting in yield increases in the order of 1% in the irrigated area downstream of Takhiatash barrage.


2.2. Enhanced quality of wetlands e.g. the Badai Tagai (riverine forest); the managed wetlands in the SKMC and AMD.








3.1. Reliability: ratio of actual water supplied to demand planned for delivery on weekly, monthly and annual basis




3.2. Irrigation efficiencies increased:

Conveyance up to area of

WUA by 10%

Within WUA area by 15%

Amount of drainage water reduced to not more than 3,000 m3/ha


3.3. Sustainability: Number of effective WUAs, level of participation in WUAs, functioning of WUAs in water distribution, dispute resolution and in O&M of the system, O&M budget, % of area waterlogged, % of moderate to highly saline soils






1. Increase in cropped area:


Baseline 2006: 65,000 ha

Actual 2009: 83,000 ha (+23%)

Estimated target: 115,000 ha
Yield increase:

Baseline 2006:Cotton – 1.69 t/ha; Wheat – 1.86 t/ha

Actual 2009: Cotton – 1.3 t/ha; Wheat – 1.4 t/ha

Estimated target: +10-20% of baseline

Employment and Income: in process




2.1. 0.8 g/l (September 2009)


Note: this is due to (i) the diversion of drainage water followed by the closing of Beruni pump station in September 2008; and (ii) the increased flow of Amu Darya in 2009.




2.2. As of March 2011: Badai Tagai Reserve: a new distribution canal 100% complete. But the canal hardly received water to date due to designed and supplied water of 5 m3/s being used by the 32 outlets in upstream Saukum Yargan Canal (Budeniy canal) for irrigation purposes.

3.1. Insignificant

Note: no information from the previous M&E consultant on WUA

3.2.
Conveyance up to WUA: (0.95)


Distribution within WUA area (inter-farm): (0.89)

Amt of drainage water from irrigated land: Insignificant

3.3. 21 WUAs established (Beruni=9; Turtkul=12)

Effectiveness of WUAs varies. WUAs participated effectively in the command area rehabilitation (CAR) and MS-1 design. Land consolidation, which began in December 2008 has improved the functioning of these WUAs in terms of the O&M.



Output from each component


1.1. SKMD including SKMC and AMD constructed


1.2. Selective rehabilitation of collector drains carried out.


2.1.1. WUAs established in the Beruni and Turtkul Tumans;







2.1.2 Training for improving I&D within the WUAs carried out


























2.1.3 Agriculture demonstrations performed; and Farmers’ Information Services Desk established.





2.2 Selective I&D improvements in the WUA areas carried out





2.3 Selective improvements in main and secondary irrigation system carried out










2.4 Works stipulated in EMP carried out













3. M&E carried out effectively with useful feed-back for project design, implementation and O&M provided


4. Improved capacity of MAWR and Karalpakstan to establish WUAs; plan and design projects, undertake procurement, and implement, operate and maintain I&D projects.

Output indicators



1.1. 15% completed by Yr2, 65% by Yr3, 100% by Yr 4



1.2. 20% completed by Yr 2, 70% by Yr 3 and 100 % by Yr 4




2.1.1. WUAs established for first 3,000 ha in the Beruni and Turkul Tumans by Yr 1; WUAs established for 18,000 ha by Yr 2, 30,000 ha by Yr 3, 50,000 ha by Yr 4 and 60,000 ha by Yr 5.


2.1.2 Training schedule in conjunction with construction of improvement works (see 2.2)



2.1.3. Demonstrations on 12 agriculture demonstration plots conducted during period Yr 3-6; Farmers Info Desk operational from Yr 3










2.2. Works completed on 5,000 ha by Yr 3, 18,000 ha by Yr 4, 38,000 ha by Yr 5, and 65,000 ha by Yr 6.




2.3 Works completed for 20% by Yr 3, 70% by Yr 4 and 100% by Yr 5






2.4.1 Badai Tugai (riverine forest) works completed by Yr.3;




2.4.2 Lake Ayazkala mitigation works for closure started Yr3 and completed by Yr5



2.4.3. Monitoring of groundwater near castles started Yr1 and is continuing

















2.4.4. AMD mitigation works (protection of range lands and crossings) completed by Yr5












3. PIU staff trained; M&E reports prepared





4. MAWR staff trained in establishing WUAs; assisting WUAs with implementation of I&D rehabilitation; irrigation scheduling techniques; and O&M planning







1.1. Construction of SKMC and AMD: 100% complete

1.2 As of March 2011: 93% earthworks; 97% concrete works; 97% land leveling; 99% deep ripping completed.





2.1.1. 21 WUAs established in Beruni and Turtkul Tumans. Beruni WUAs have a total of 32,170 ha of command area and the WUAs of Turtkul have a total of 31,388 ha of command area.


2.1.2. Training related to collector and drain remodeling and deep ripping to remove plough pan and improve soil permeability had positive impacts on yields and farmers have entered into fee-based contracts with FISC to have similar services available on regular basis.
2.1.3. 15 demonstration plots (Beruni=7, Turtkul=8) established with successful demonstration of cotton yield more than 3.5 t/ha and wheat more than 4t/ha. Farmer Field School (FFS) established and currently functioning; no details available on impact of this FFS. Farmers’ Information Support Center/Desk (FISC) established as NGO and functioning in Beruni and Turtkul; 14,000 booklets, 860 bulletins and 100 posters issued and distributed. 691 farmers trained, and 200 farmers participated in various seminars (no details on impact available). Sustainability of FISC is of concern due to limited financial resources to maintain staff, office and transport.
2.2. As of March 2011: 114% earthworks; 125% concrete works completed.

Note: exceeding of the target was possible when project resources were added for this activity following the extension of the project and re-allocation of project proceeds in 2010.
2.3. As of March 2011: Preparatory works started in January 2011 with a completion date of May 2012.
2.4.1. As of September 2010: 100% works completed. Impact: by September 2010, 3103 ha were saturated and almost the whole remaining territory of Baday-Tugai reserve was wetted; 2500 ha of natural Tugai vegetation reappeared.
2.4.2. Kyzylkum Pumping Station closed on March 2008; EMP measures (salt-blowing control) not yet implemented; Natural growth of tamarisk (Tamarix hispida) observed.
2.4.3. As of March 2011: Still continuing, groundwater level lowered to satisfactory level north of SKMD, in irrigated area not much lowering observed; Kyzyl Kala monument negatively affected by spoil banks. Otvodyashi collector flows near the monument (about 100m away) and meets with the SKMC (near 200m). In junction point of Otvodyashi and SKMC, a junction structure has been constructed and banks are stabilized to prevent from bank erosion. The bank of collector close to monument site was at vulnerable stage breaching at high discharge coming from Akchakul lake, K-9 and K-6-1 collectors. It was necessary to protect the monument and thus left bank was stabilized with flatter slope and the spoils were accordingly leveled and placed as per the contract specification. At site the leveled spoil is located on the back side of the entrance to the Kyzyl Kala monument. Because of the location of collector, nothing special can be done considering the site condition.
2.4.4. As of March 2011: 100% complete - 11 bridges for herders completed; erosion protection measures along AMD implemented but not satisfactory; breaches are recorded (eg.: N 42° 38’ 27.7”; E061° 33’16.2”). Breaches have happened due to embankment being overtopped due to uncontrolled high discharge exceeding design discharge of 25m3/s (recorded up to 37m3/s). It has happened couple of times and they have been repaired. In current situation, there is no breached section in AMD.

3. M&E annual report available for 2009, but not for 2010 due to arrangements that had to be put in place to recruit a new M&E Consulting Company after the project was extended from June 30, 2010 till June 30, 2013.

4. Training of MAWR staff completed in 2008; total of 26 people trained. A Training Manual was prepared covering all issues related to Irrigation System Administration, Hydro-Meliorative Expedition and raiselvodkhoz water management activities. The following training modules were delivered:

- Water management in practice;

- Technical aspects of operating I&D systems;

- Flow measurement in canals and collectors;

- Monitoring of the meliorative condition of irrigated lands

The impact of this activity has been weak as there has been strong resistance to training the staff who plan, operate and maintain I&D systems and government water management organizations have not been interested in improving water management. In addition, there have been several incidents of damage to project construction works by excessive and uncontrolled I&D flows.



Yüklə 347,71 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə