Rania alammar 2 – The Princess' Situation after the Accident

DIANA

THE ABDUCITON

RANIA ALAMMAR

2 – The Princess' Situation after the Accident:

Was the Princess in a dangerous condition and unconscious after the incident?

The Princess was in a dangerous condition:

In (2) p 384, the writer speaks about the state of the pulse and said that the first doctor on the scene was Frederic Mailliez who said he noted that the pulse is weak and fast and that he tried to help her breathe.

In (2) p 384, Paget report said that the Princess was barely conscious.

In (2) p 388, Dr. Jean-Marc Martino says in the ambulance he registered a decline in blood pressure, which is a sign of internal bleeding.

In (2) p 389-390, Dr. Martino, the ambulance doctor, tells that Diana suffered a heart attack when pulled out of the Mercedes.

The Princess was in poor but not dangerous condition:

In (2) p 384, Philip Boyer from the Fire Service said that "her pulse was normal and strong" and "her breathing was normal."

In (2) p 384, Sebastian Dorzee a policeman who supported the Princess at the scene said she was conscious, as well as his fellow Xavier Gourmelon and the ambulance SAMU Dr. Jean-Marc Martino.

In (2) p 385, Diana was talking.

In (2) p 388, Philip Boyer of the Fire Service watched the vital functions and did not see a decrease in blood pressure (if there was internal bleeding the blood pressure supposed to be a sign since she was under Boyer's control and not only upon receipt of Dr. Martino on her, knowing that Paget report did not interrogate and ignored Philip Boyer).

In (2) p 389-390, the ambulance driver Michel Massebeuf in his testimony of the Princess being taken out from the Mercedes, does not describe or mention anything about cardiac arrest (Paget report ignored his testimony.)

Comment:

It is clear that doctors Jean-Marc Martino, Frederic Mailliez and Paget report had a role in giving an exaggerated picture and inaccurate on the condition of the Princess immediately after the incident, the evidence is that the testimonies of others who said the opposite were ignored, while Paget report focused on the negative image of the medical condition.

The idea of the writer John Morgan and many writers and investigators is that Diana was killed in a slow murder from the start on the hands of Dr. Mailliez, Martino and those with them in the ambulance like Dr. Arnaud Derossi through some of the measures that have contributed in her death.

The following points are about some of what happened immediately after the incident, which shows a suspicious medical treatment on the Princess. They did not revive her to a good condition, yes, but also did not kill her, and inevitably they kept her alive in all the stages in which they could have killed her:

In (2) p 383, the writer says that the policeman Sebastian Dorzee, who supported the Princess at the scene, was requested to keep the Princess in the state of consciousness. So he talked with her and checked the pulse of the neck until she was received by a specialist medical team.

The people in charge of the conspiracy who studied all the aspects of the crime intended to be, why let the firefighters order the policeman Derozee to keep her conscious?

In (2) p 394, the writer here accused the doctors of neglecting to notice the internal bleeding signs, which the low blood pressure is one of them, especially after the alleged cardiac arrest. Since the fact of the cardiac arrest, that occurred in 12:48 when Diana was pulled out of the wreckage of the car is questionable, for it is only claimed by Martino with a weak testimony from the driver of the ambulance, who cannot remember if this happened here or in 1:20 while being transported to the emergency vehicle, and because she was conscious and talking, then why the writer at p. 394 accuses the doctors of neglecting her suggesting that the cardiac arrest is the cause of death?

Here the author is trying to condemn the accused with something the accused himself has lied about, and the accused is contradicted and known to be a liar for his descriptions of the medical condition. Is it because these descriptions are not truthful, and the internal bleeding was not deadly serious and that is why she was alive that night?

The writer mentions an important information about the lack of any details on the status of the wound in the pulmonary artery.

In (4) p 436, description from several witnesses, before the arrival of the ambulance, of Diana as being good and was talking and moving a little. One of them said, "I can see that she was only wounded because she was moving". Policeman Dorzee said "she moved, her eyes were open, speaking to me in a foreign language, I think she said, my God" and also he said "Diana seemed in better shape than the rest who were with her in the Mercedes."

Diana was conscious, and all these witnesses and their words were ignored by the judge Scott Baker in the case in 2008 and even in the Paget report in 2006 except for the Dr. Frederic Mailliez who testified that she was unconscious after the incident, but Paget report did not interview him and only took his words from the French investigation of 1997.

In (4) in 439_ 449, the writer is skeptical of all the words of Dr Mailliez, and proved that he changes his testimonies most of the time. One of the things is that Dr. Mailliez portrayed the medical condition of Diana much worse than in reality, in terms of awareness and speech.

However, we must not forget that he also said that she seemed not hopeless and have a chance to survive. Then why the writer focused on the negative aspects of his words though suspicious?

Question: As the author asserts that Mailliez is suspicious and part of the conspiracy himself, then why didn’t he kill Diana directly? By injection or anything during his claimed treatment on her. Though a little, but does not what he did like giving oxygen, contributed in making sure of her survival? And what about the reason for his fast departure while she was still alive?

Was it not obvious that his role was to deliver her alive to the following parties, at the same time gives the impression to the media of the Princess' serious condition? Like putting poison in the honey.

In (4) p 451-453, the writer here wonders why neither Dr. Frederic Mailliez nor the fire service after him, measured the blood pressure that was possible to give a quick sign of internal bleeding?

Yet, we do not forget at the same time the policeman Sebastian Dorzee said that he was requested to keep her awake and not let her fall asleep.

The writer wondered why doctors did not attend with the fire service though they should be the first responders to the scene to rescue the injured? And why there was a significant neglect in the initiative treatment of Diana? And why pulling her out of the car wreckage took so much time? And why they stood waiting for the SAMU ambulance?

In short, the author says that it is clear that there are orders not to treat Diana, which suggests to us the intention of eliminating her.

Again like my question about Mailliez, Why did not they simply kill her at the scene, while they were all gathered around her and had all the tools to do so in a quiet and medical manner?

Their concern and waiting for the SAMU because their intention was to kidnap and not murder her. She is delivered to others as well to keep it low and save her while appeared to be neglecters.

In (4) p 454-461, it is clear that Dr. Martino was tasked to control the surrounded circumstances and was not actually very interested in remedying Diana as required.

Doesn't that suggests the existence of a state of contentment about the medical condition that she would not die at all?

If the writer wanted to say the reverse and the reason for the delayed treatment is because they wanted to kill her, my thoughts goes to that all conditions were available to kill her faster in the tunnel.

The writer also said that Martino lied when he contacted the center of SAMU to give a report on the patient's condition where Martino said that the injury does not exceed an injury in the arm, while in another statement to the French police he gave a description that suggests more wounds and the possibility of an internal injury.

I agree with the writer that Martino lied, but what he lied about may be the contrary. I mean that the second description is kind of true but very much exaggerated and the first is correct because she was really fine and didn't look in a very bad condition. He lied more to the police than to the SAMU, and that exaggerated description complies with the exaggeration of Dr. Mailliez about her status, as the writer says that they both are suspicious. All this confirms my belief that the slow process of treatment was because she did not really look in a serious condition to such a degree.

Then why Martino requested additional ambulance car since the case given in principle (injured arm) does not need another car? My answer about this action is that it is a ratification to my opinion which says that all of this was just to give an exaggerated picture of the Princess being in a very serious condition and needed another ambulance.

The writer said that the initial report on the state of Diana about just an injury in the arm does not make SAMU rush in a state of emergency, which gave Martino the control over the atmosphere in the tunnel. This meaning of speech is contrary to the fact that they already sent a SAMU after all in few minutes which is true. I think that there is exaggeration in the reaction rate for the given medical description.

In (4) p 478 – 481, the writer here mentions the lies and exaggerations of Martino. Martino said that when he took Diana out of the Mercedes she suffered a heart attack, prompting him to perform a medical massage on the chest and the pulse did not beat again until more than 2 minutes. On the other hand, the writer mentions certificates from two different experts that the situation was not as described. these certificates shows that Diana’s heart was sound at that time, but the pulse was not clear for seconds because of her position in the car, where her legs were high for a long period of time, and that makes the blood circulation in abnormal condition and affects the heart and its pump of blood. This requires only modifying her position or make her lie down comfortably and clicking on the chest.

The author says that when Martino contacted the ambulance center SAMU describing only an arm injury, but later on he exaggerated in the description of a heart attack and a medical massage, then her (Diana) coming back to life after more than about two minutes. All this made Martino successful not to alert the medical center in terms of sending more assistance and ambulances. Also, he has succeeded in preparing the excuse from the beginning that if Diana dies then it is because of the very bad condition of her heart.

My comment on this point is that they portrayed the situation as so bad in order to draw a picture that death was not escapable while they actually kept her alive. We notice that despite Martino's description of a simple injury the ambulance center responded with more than one ambulance. In addition, the writer did not mention that the initial report to the SAMU, which stated only that the patient was wounded in the arm was made in 12:43 while the claim of a cardiac arrest was at 1:00 when she was pulled out of the car. That means there is a difference in time, and they already went on alert before even getting the information of the cardiac arrest and sent her two ambulance cars with doctors, one of them is Dr. Arnaud Derossi. I think this type of alert cannot be denied.

Then the second interpretation of the author of Martino being successful in preparing the excuse from the beginning that if Diana died then it is because her heart was in a very bad condition, is true Yes, but not to let her die as a fact, otherwise they have had all the means and time to kill her quietly at the time, but rather to draw a false picture of murder and death.

In (4) p 490-491, the writer says that the initial report Martino gave to the ambulance base in which he described the situation of Diana to be just injured in the arm, gave him a chance to control the conditions and assure the SAMU base that Diana is not in a critical condition. In that way he wouldn’t be bothered by constant communion and would have the opportunity not to update the contact with them. The writer also says that in addition to the slow journey from Necker hospital, which the ambulance came from, to the Alma tunnel scene. All of the above enabled Martino to keep Diana in the position where she was being seated in the car with her feet pulled up that led to the lack of clarity of the pulse. The writer stresses that Martino did all this with a confirmed knowledge and thus all of the above excuses him to perform intubation and ventilation. In short, the writer wants to say that all the above was a deliberate intention to kill Diana.

First, how is it possible the one who put the whole plan knew that Diana would inevitably be seated in the harmful position described in the car and thus put all those steps for Martino to act based on its method of treatment?

Moreover, the conspirators had many chances to kill Diana, but they did not do it. On the contrary, as I said they took measures to Yes keep her silent and numb but also for sure alive. I find that what Martino, Derossi and others did was spontaneously and thoughtful at the same time. Spontaneous remedial measures based on the reading of the situation in a timely manner and this exercise is full of practices that run counter to the will of murder, and deliberate on the other hand in order for the Princess to remain alive and taken later, which is exactly what they have done by Keeping her alive after the accident. This precludes the will of killing.

As for the fact that some people saw her conscious, why Dr. Mailliez at first said she was conscious and then his words changed to she was not? What other reason there could be for his direct presence after the incident, but to make sure she stays alive? If the original target is only killing her then the intelligence will not be providing a doctor, but rather would have left her until the ambulance arrives. What he did is handing her over alive to the fire service who arrived quickly.

And why there is no medical record of what happened before the arrival of the fire service? Except to hide their work, because it would reveal that the medical condition was not bad.

Also the evidence of Philip Boyer who worked with the fire service in (20) p 384, which was quite the opposite to the words of Mailliez, especially in regard the pulse and respiration as well, is quite enough.

Did Diana had internal bleeding? Or was it non-fatal?

Since we now believe that Diana was conscious after the accident, the question is whether it is possible for a person whose heart was bleeding to be conscious, speaking, though little, and moves and wraps his head left and right and acting disturbed, as these descriptions are listed in the books, after a period of internal bleeding? I mean, isn't it supposed be that over time and with increasing bleeding the status of the person should be the opposite?

In (2) p 388, Why low blood pressure, which is a sign of internal bleeding, was not mentioned except by Dr. Martino in the ambulance? And why Philip Boyer the Fire Service man who observed Diana did not notice such a critical sign at all, saying that the Princess was sound? It is noteworthy that Philip Boyer was ignored by Paget report.

In (2) p 390, the writer condemns Dr. Martino for just thinking to do a massage of the heart under the pretext of cardiac arrest despite knowing that there is internal bleeding, which is a harmless thing to do, and considers it an intention to kill.

My comment here is that if Martino knows that this harmful option is going to kill the princess, why did not he do it? Isn't this an appropriate opportunity to kill her with a medical excuse?

Also since she was left throughout this period since the accident until reaching the hospital, isn't this an evidence of a non-fatal bleeding? And an evidence of the exaggeration and the lies of the medical condition of the Princess by Martino? Who, as stated previously, suddenly claimed in the ambulance a significant reduction of pressure as a sign of a deadly bleeding, where as mentioned before that other witnesses said that her vital functions were fine which mark that the blood pressure was ok? And moreover, the Princess was very conscious that he injected her with a drug because she refused the treatment. Should an anesthetic be given to a patient in a cardiac arrest?

Is the picture now formed that the woman was wounded yes, but not in mortal danger, and was drugged?

In (3) p 297, Philip Boyer from the Fire Service said that problems did not occur when Diana was being pulled out of the car. This contradicts Dr. Martino in the previous book (2) that a cardiac arrest happened to her at that moment. Also contradicts with Martino's description in this book (3) in page 300 that he found it difficult to remove her from the car and that her setting position was difficult.

In (3) p 329, we see the picture of the ambulance report. This report is actually made up of several pages but was not delivered to the jury to study in 2008 except the first page of it. There were also two persons in the ambulance, Barbara Kapfer and someone named Fadi, whom have never been questioned.

Why the jury was prevented from seeing the full report of the ambulance? Was it hiding something about the medical state of the Princess? For example she was not in a fatal state?

In (4) p 485, the writer says that the reason for the intubation, ventilation and drugging Diana , which was proved to be an improper procedure to the health status of the princess since she was breathing normally but an exaggerated procedure , is that Dr. Martino assisted by Dr. Derossi wanted to silence Diana completely.

My comment is, why silencing her while it is possible even to kill her at this moment by anesthesia? And there are many cases in which the patient died because of the anesthetic.

Why the effort to take strange measures and exaggerated Yes, but do not lead to a certain death? Yet they kept her alive and surly in a state where she could not move? Everyone says to kill her, but I see a processing case of kidnapping.

In (4) p 487, the book presents a picture of the only document that was displayed in the investigation of a report by the SAMU ambulance about Diana's state directly after the incident in the tunnel. The writer refers to the existence of a lot of non complemented blanks and non-signatories. Therefore, the fact that Martino is the one who wrote it is questionable and only a possibility for the absence of a signature. Was it none complemented only to hide the true medical condition?

In (4) p 496, the writer says that Dr. Arnaud Derossi came in another ambulance after Martino when the latter sent to the ambulance center about the injured arm.

Why did Derossi lie when he sent his already late report, which was at 1:20 to the ambulance center, where he described the case of a head injury as if it is very important and there is a need for a neurologist to be in La Petit Hospital, and said the chest had no injury while it is totally the opposite?

Derossi lied to the extent that Martino in the investigation, who said that the injury was in the chest, tried to justify Derossi's several lies, including that he was not in the ambulance. The writer says that this led to delaying the attendance of the heart surgeon after the arrival of Diana to the hospital thus delaying her treatment, and that suggests the intent to kill Diana.

My comment here is even if we assume that the words of the writer are true because he has a strong argument here, yet this does not negate the fact that she was alive and a surgery was done after all. Why was she rescued albeit slowly, and reached the hospital alive? Weren't all the conditions again ripe to kill her before they reach the hospital?

In (4) p 499, the writer mentions the blood pressure conditions and shows that the SAMU Center's Dr. Marc Lejay, when he knew from Derossi that the blood pressure was low, said that this is because of the intubation and ventilation, a violent procedure as he described it, which is inappropriate because Diana's state was fine, as he did not know from Derossi here about the Chest injury.

My comment is that the issue of low blood pressure, which is a sign of internal bleeding, is already doubted .While here as said that the possible reasons of the low blood pressure were the anesthesia and the intubation, indicates that the state of her bleeding was not fatal.

I mean that the writer wants to say that the real reason behind the low blood pressure is actually internal bleeding while the acts of Martino in the treatment show that he did not care much about internal bleeding. The author says that this shows the intention to kill. While I say that Martino, given his previous exaggerations to portray the situation as hazardous, did the same here. It means the bleeding was not fatal and this is only part of the exaggerations.

Then his conduct of a therapeutic procedure different from what should be in the case of hemorrhage, indicates that he has taken the right action as she arrived alive to the hospital after all, and I think she was not in mortal danger, but she was drugged as I said, and the procedures of anesthesia and intubation were evidence of the intention of putting her in complete anesthesia and not the intention of killing.

In (4) p 499-500, according to the word of Dr. Andre Lienhart (a suspicious character with Dr. Dominique Lecomte who conducted the alleged autopsy and embalming on Diana and Henri Paul) he said Martino injected Diana with Dopamine (leads to high blood pressure), which in fact In the case of internal bleeding is a bad choice and does not improve it. And because Lienhart only depends on the words of Martino and there is no documentation or evidence on the amount of Dopamine, then how can we trust that the quantity really caused increasing risk? Isn't it possible that Martino is exaggerating here, and that is why he does not give the document of the amount? Or maybe even he did not give this medicine to her at all.

Of course this is only possible if the consideration of the case is kidnapping, otherwise not denying the originally doubtful Martino's testimony lead to believe the words of the writer that there is a clear intention to kill in this work. The writer also says that this procedure may be good but only if the patient was taken in speed to the hospital while they did not do this. His words are true, but in any case she arrived alive.

And then who can ensure us that they really gave her Dopamine in the absence of proper documentation? And all what we have right now are just the words of Martino, a dubious character. At this point some people may see that the interpretation of the writer stronger than my words, but his words based on sources of questionable origin, this is what I want to say and the evidence in the following:

In (4) p 573, the writer says what is most dangerous, namely that what if the material is said to be Dopamine is not Dopamine, but other material led to her death? My comment is that this is 100% true, but not necessarily that the material was replaced by a lethal material, otherwise Dopamine benefits in this case and there is no need to be replaced as long as it is going to hurt her and lead to her death, as originally has been said, but rather I believe it's an Anesthetic.

In (2) p 393, under the title of the nature of Diana's injury is another sign of trying to give the impression of inevitable death, that the two doctors Lecomte and Lienhart who supervised the alleged anatomy and embalming of Diana, have always insisted that her condition was completely hopeless from the start, although other testimonies say this is not true, including the American Dr. John Ochsner's from his experience, As well as the state of consciousness that the Princess was in after the accident.

Why insisting that the condition cannot be survived? What is the purpose of the denial of medical certificates of others? Especially that Lecomte and Lienhart did not attend the surgery which Diana has gone under. And all this in the light of the unique description of Frederic Mailliez, the first doctor in the tunnel, in some of his words he said her heart was removed from its place? Is it possible to live for a moment with a displaced or a ripped heart?

In (4) p 503-504, the writer says that Martino contradicts everything and claims that Diana's blood pressure and her heart's beats became good after being in the ambulance in the tunnel at 1:00 because he treated her. Here Martino said the same descriptions of blood pressure and the heart's beat, as which Derossi had described in a contact with the SAMU Center at 1:20, which means her condition improved well.

The writer asks, why was she not transferred directly to the hospital since the movement of the car is no longer harmful to her? Because usually they argue that they were slow in their movement by the car because of the issue of low blood pressure. But the writer says that Diana's state deteriorated significantly since she was taken over by Martino in 12:40 until they reached the hospital.

My comment is how if her condition improved said to have deteriorated? Where is the document and proof of the truth of this speech? All this talk is supported only by descriptions of Martino and co-conspirators in the case. But in general it seems to me from the outset that the condition was stable. If the author wanted to say that in fact it deteriorated after a while he would be giving the right to Martino not to move the ambulance car in the tunnel and gave him an excuse to the delay of getting her to the hospital. And if the writer did not give him the right (the excuse of deteriorating), and it was a must to move quickly, then the writer should believe that her condition has improved allowing them to move.

However, if the answer here is that her blood pressure was not at high risk so the condition was stable, and the claim of Martino that her condition improved after treatment, is only a lie to suggest that before this she was in imminent danger, therefore he did not move the car because she was in immediate danger. Then Martino here followed French law that allows him to do so as if the patient is at risk requires treatment on-site.

The issue of the delay means two things. First, gaining control over Diana and drugging her without killing her. Secondly, it is a suggestive process such as the issue of pregnancy in order for people to be preoccupied with this controversy away from the fact and the nature of the crime, namely abduction.

In (4) p 517, Doctors Martino, Lecomte and Lienhart, also Judge Scott Baker and police lawyer Duncan McLeod, whom they are all suspicious characters according to the writer, say that Diana's state worsened and dropped her blood pressure disastrously before reaching the hospital for 5 minutes and thus Martino stopped the car. The author says that there is no clarification on this strange issue. Of course as the writer wrote everything on the grounds that behind their actions was the intention to kill, it makes sense here to say that since they did not kill her there is also exaggerated description of the medical condition which is not trusted since it is by the words of Martino. I mean the disastrous low blood pressure and that the reason the car was stopped is completely different and I will write about it. Therefore the thesis that this is exaggerated in the context of other exaggerations to suggest that Diana's condition was fatal is acceptable here.

From all of the above it is clear that the issues of blood pressure and internal bleeding were much exaggerated and run counter to other testimonies that the condition was not to this degree. If the intention was pure murder they could in this opportunity to kill her inevitably, because whatever they do as attempts to make the condition worse under the intent to kill, inevitable death cannot be for sure. I do not think they would have risked leaving her alive after all this effort in planning the murder, and I think it is an acceptable hypothesis that the slow treatment is indeed to show the image of death and murder, yet no one ever will feel it was a kidnapping, because the public opinion is preoccupied with these issues, as has been to the issue of pregnancy, and deviate it from observing the truth.

TO BE CONTINUED

Rania Alammar

22-7-2015

[e-mail]

Please watch the film I made in 2014 here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFZu_PbOiL0