Redesigning modern life vancouver art gallery hatje cantz



Yüklə 85,52 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü85,52 Kb.
#49612


GRAND HOTEL

REDESIGNING MODERN LIFE

VANCOUVER ART GALLERY    HATJE CANTZ



SOCIAL


286

287


INTERVIEW

CULTURE


TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER

INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

JENNIFER M. VOLLAND 

 How did you end up in Berlin?

TOM MICHELBERGER 

 We both came to Berlin because it 

inspired us. We had found our new home. We come 

from the west side of Germany where people have 

a very classical approach to life and career. Berlin 

allows for more experimentation and nobody cares 

too much about conventional structure. 

NADINE MAY 

 Berlin lets you try out things. You meet 

people in a natural way and you meet people who 

share ideas. People find Berlin for various reasons 

but they all have something in common. Berlin felt 

very open. The city instantly inspires you.

J.M.V.

  And how did you select this particular neighbour-

hood for the Michelberger?

T.M. 


 The hotel occupies one of only five buildings 

on this street that were all designed by the same 

why the idea was important to us. The more we 

talked about it, the more we thought we had to do it. 

We thought of what it could be, a social space where 

people from all different backgrounds could congre-

gate, and a lively and productive space that could 

become the centre of our lives. We never had a target 

group. We wanted to make it very open. For everyone 

it is something different—whether it is the design, 

or the social atmosphere, whatever. It is a natural 

selection of a very diverse audience. The hotel is a 

combination of all the characters and people that 

work here. But first and foremost, we have done our 

homework and built a hotel that operates on all levels 

most professionally. If you just want a good bed and 

quick checking in and out, you get it. If you want 

more from your visit, it’s there to find.

J.M.V.

  You’ve described the hotel as an ever-evolving 

entity. Explain.

N.M. 


 We interact daily with the people that come here 

and solicit their feedback. You never have the feeling 

you are completely satisfied. In that way, we are 

always trying to improve and try out new things.

architect. It is 120 years old and it was a former 

factory. We are located in between the two dis-

tricts of Friedrichshain and Kreuzberg, cornered 

by two bridges and near the underground. It is a 

very neutral location. When we came here, it was 

a cool neighbourhood to live in, but it was not the 

most visited area for tourists. Some would even have 

considered it off the map. The past years it more 

and more became the heart of Berlin’s vibrant and 

diverse nightlife scene. The combination with the 

culturally diverse neighbourhoods made it one of 

the most interesting destinations for an experience 

beyond the major sites. It felt and feels good that 

people would have to find their way to us.

J.M.V. 

 Tell me about your ideas for the Michelberger.

T.M. 


 At the time, Berlin was the only place that some-

thing like this could grow. We always knew we 

wanted to do something on our own, but we defi-

nitely do not have hotel backgrounds. And we never 

really looked at other hotels. We just thought about 

T.M. 


 This place has evolved with our personalities. 

As we get older, the Michelberger grows with us. We 

never felt it had to have the structure and rules of the 

big chain hotels. We don’t feel like hotel directors; 

we just have to move along and let others move along 

with us. But we always try to stay sensitive to the 

needs of the people that work here.

A DIFFERENT 

KIND OF HOTEL 

EVOLVES IN 

BERLIN

OPPOSITE TOP  Michelberger 



Hotel, Berlin (during 

construction), 2009

OPPOSITE BOTTOM  Studio 

Aisslinger, room, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Paff, 2010




288

289


J.M.V. 

 You do have an interesting internal working 

structure. 

N.M. 


 I guess. But to us it feels natural. It’s a structure 

that is constantly evolving—that creates little and 

big spaces for people to leave their mark.

T.M. 


 To some degree you need the hierarchy, but it 

doesn’t have to feel hierarchical. There is nothing 

like “my job is more important than your job.” 

Everyone in the system is just as important as the 

others, and people can easily move wherever they 

want to move. There is an openness and appreciation 

for all. People have a very personal experience here. 

This is important because everything we do gives us 

more freedom. In the end, your work life should be 

quality time. In this regard, it is important for us to 

decide who we work with.

J.M.V. 


 Does this relate to your decision to have the design 

studio in-house?

N.M.  


We are able to carry out ideas in-house because 

we have the design studio. It’s easy because we all 

know each other very well. It would feel odd to ask 

an agency. In this way, we can act quickly and do 

something special. To have this as an integrated part 

of the hotel feels very natural. Early on, we made the 

decision to keep on the creative talent. Their signa-

ture is on everything we do.

T.M. 

 From the start, we thought of the hotel as a base 



for ideas. The money we make we reinvest in our 

own products, like our coconut water. We couldn’t 

find anything like it in Berlin and we wanted it. 

So Nadine and I went to Thailand. We found the 

most amazing plantation and figured out a way of 

distribution. 

J.M.V. 

 When we met a few years ago one of you said that 

the Michelberger is more like a family hotel than a tra-

ditional one. Do you consider it a hotel first?

N.M. 


 It is definitely a hotel. Foremost, we have to 

make sure that the rooms are clean and that there is 

coffee here in the morning. 

T.M. 


 If you want to see more, then there can be more. 

Sometimes we are described as family-run. We offer 

a similar experience to the places we visited when 

we were kids. But this is not a traditional family. 

Although it feels like a family, we are not bound by 

blood and there are not any of the negative parts of the 

family dynamic. There is more bonding and sharing 

of interests. In general though, there is a tendency 

to theme hotels. But you cannot strategically theme 

things. People can’t be fooled. They like to relate to 

the things. At least this is what we like to believe. 

J.M.V. 


 In the Grand Hotel exhibition, we give a lot of 

attention the idea of the hotel as a cultural incuba-

tor, where creative types not only congregate but also 

produce. Do you see the Michelberger this way?

T.M. 


 The hotel gives us all a reason to be here, and 

when people are interested in similar things, things 

happen. We programmed music into the hotel, 

not because we wanted to get cool musicians, but 

because it was already a part of our lives. You can’t 

A DIFFERENT KIND OF HOTEL EVOLVES IN BERLIN

INTERVIEW

TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER

INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

CULTURE


OPPOSITE LEFT  Studio Aisslinger, 

The Big One, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Pfaff, 2010

OPPOSITE TOP RIGHT  Studio 

Aisslinger, Loft Room, 

Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2010

OPPOSITE BOTTOM RIGHT  



Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2009

TOP  Michelberger Hotel Studio, 



door keycards, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Pfaff, 2009

BOTTOM  Exterior signage, 

Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2009



290

291


plan spontaneous, amazing concerts. But we can 

decide at five in the evening to post a blog entry and 

this might attract 200 people. But we don’t see this as 

planning. Rather, it happens organically. 

N.M. 

 The performers are on stage, but they don’t feel 



“on stage.” There is an audience, but at the same 

time, it is not an audience. It is all one. The space 

has intimacy and it allows things to happen. We 

cannot decide who comes in here, but we can create 

a space that is a product of us, a space that feels invit-

ing. For example, there are multiple doors into the 

lobby. Many people come in and don’t realize it is a 

hotel. We want it to be inviting for everybody, not just 

friends or hotel guests. If you put love into an envi-

ronment, then people will feel attracted to it. People 

find the space to be protective and embracing.

J.M.V. 


 What are your plans for the future?

T.M. 


 The Michelberger has been open three years 

now. I think of how much growing there was. We all 

know each other so well now. It is fortunate to be sur-

rounded with people you trust. But we don’t consider 

ourselves to be hotel directors. Of course, we were 

involved in all the operations at the beginning, but 

not anymore. At some point, you have to let go. We 

continue to go to the hotel every day when we are 

in Berlin. But now we only work on the perspective 

and continued vision and we are there to offer guid-

ance to others. We never really thought of having 

another hotel, but we’ve always seen New York as a 

very inspiring place and we feel that we would never 

get bored there, so we are looking to open a second 

hotel there—a sister hotel—together with two musi-

cians who we became great friends with, who share 

similar feelings and urges to those we had in Berlin.

 

N.M. 



 There has been some attention to our hotel in 

Berlin, but we never felt the need to go anywhere. 

The idea just evolved. It is not about timing. It is 

about where our personalities are now. But even if we 

T.M. 

 Last summer we had the Michelberger Mystery 



Music Festival. We shut down the hotel for three 

days except to the performers, friends and indi-

viduals from the booking agencies, and we didn’t 

announce the bands before the event. This is exactly 

the kind of freedom that we talk about. Long before 

we actually opened the hotel, we envisioned that 

people would be looking out their windows into the 

courtyard below, and this is exactly what happened. 

It was a very magical moment for us. So we don’t try 

to make the hotel lively everyday. Sometimes there 

will just be three people in the lobby. Whatever we 

do, it has to be something we fully enjoy and support. 

The Festival had such lasting effects on us and ev-

erybody that took part. Freedom is the greatest gift, 

to be able to say yes or no to different things. We do 

things when they feel right. 

find someone who gives us the money, it still needs 

to fit and to feel comfortable. 

J.M.V. 

 And will your team in Berlin be involved?

N.M. 


 We are open to new people and what they will 

bring in. But it will be an integration of the existing 

team and new people we meet. Once they are both up 

and running there will be a constant short- and long-

term exchange of people.

T.M. 


 This new venture will be much bigger. We 

can’t make the same mistakes we did the first time 

around, and we need to trust what we’ve learned. We 

[will] start this project with another level of experi-

ence. The more projects we do, the more we know 

what we are good at. 

A DIFFERENT KIND OF HOTEL EVOLVES IN BERLIN

INTERVIEW

CULTURE

TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER



INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

ABOVE  The Michelberger 

Mystery Music Festival. Photo 

by Matze Hielscher and Uli 

Peters, 2011

LEFT  Michelberger Hotel, 

Berlin, 2009. Photo by James 

Pfaff, 2010

TOP RIGHT  Studio Aisslinger, 

Loft Room, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Pfaff, 2010

BOTTOM RIGHT  Studio Aisslinger, 

reception area, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Pfaff, 2009




292

293


A DIFFERENT KIND OF HOTEL EVOLVES IN BERLIN

INTERVIEW

J.M.V.

  How did you become involved in the Michelberger 

Hotel?

AZAR KAZIMIR 

 I heard from a friend that someone 

wanted to do a new concept for a hotel in Berlin. I had 

recently left the advertising world and had opened my 

own design studio. I went to see Tom and Nadine in 

this huge empty building. They explained the concept 

and after five minutes I thought, “Yeah, this is going 

to work.” I created six weeks’ worth of work—what 

I felt was the creative expression of the hotel, rather 

than the physical manifestation of the building. In 

other words, how would the Michelberger speak 

outside the confines of the building? They loved the 

work. Until this time, they hadn’t yet been exposed to 

potential graphical expressions of the hotel. This was 

good because it allowed them to envision things in a 

fresh and open way. I started with them as my client.

After some time, six to eight months perhaps, I 

thought, “I shouldn’t do this from my home. I should 

just be the studio inside the hotel.” We always knew 

the hotel was supposed to be for people like us—cre-

ative people. It worked because it provided stability. 

Then I wouldn’t be at odds with a client. It became 

a way of empowerment and freedom after years of 

being dicked around at agencies. Because the day-to-

day work would be for the hotel and that relationship 

had proven to work very well, and I would not have 

to take on work simply because I needed to, external 

to the hotel, I would always be able to choose what 

do something with an external client, it never really 

worked out or was difficult, for all the usual reasons. 

I worried about this, but then Tom and Nadine said 

to me one day that we would benefit much more if 

we spent our time and energy on ourselves and our 

own projects, and not on others. And of course they 

were totally right. So in the end we’re a design studio 

which only works for ourselves. Sounds weird, but I 

can assure you, from my point of view, it’s wonderful.

Finally, the idea of a hotel with a design studio was 

original. I was conscious about the trend toward multi- 

disciplinary brands—the idea that the hotel doesn’t 

just have to be a hotel. We didn’t have to work with an 

agency. The move fit with the zeitgeist of the time.

J.M.V. 


 Tell me about your creative vision for the 

Michelberger.

A.K. 


 There was a big synergy between Tom and 

Nadine and me. My background is in advertis-

ing. I had come from a world of adapting to clients’ 

needs. But Tom was talking about something that 

was handcrafted and full of detail, and I thought I 

could translate that into graphic design. The graphic 

program is a direct expression of the hotel, and 

incidentally, it was also indicative of the time. The 

Internet had destroyed the preciousness of graphics. 

The aesthetic had become rough and ready and, in a 

way, ugly. This fit with their mentality. They are con-

stantly in movement. So rather than reprint things 

all the time, which on occasion we have to do, we 

focus on recharging or renewing the work, without 

making things too careful or too pretty. It is impor-

tant for us to be irreverent, to be cheeky. We always 

I would or wouldn’t do, or walk away if the client 

behaved poorly.

Also, at that time, I had thought that the studio 

would work for external clients, [that it] would also 

provide an income stream. That hasn’t happened 

as I imagined. Firstly, the amount of work for the 

hotel gets bigger and bigger, so there is little spare 

time. And on the few occasions where we tried to 

try to remember that the place was for people like 

us. The rooms are simple. The rates are low. But we 

have people at the hotel full time whose job it is to 

create things for people to look at. That is a luxury 

that guests could appreciate. They realize the work 

that goes into each detail. That is a different type of 

luxury than the typical hotel, but it is still a luxury. 

A keycard costs the same to print whether they are 

white or they have a graphic.

J.M.V. 


 What was the original scope of your design work?

A.K. 


 It was very organic. Some things needed to be 

done. Tom and Nadine brought in ideas. Then some 

things would come from me. Everything was fair 

game … drawing on walls, basi-

cally anything with a surface.

J.M.V. 


 The Michelberger has 

always been described to us as an 

evolving project. So what now?

A.K. 


 We’ve expanded. The 

design studio consists of five 

people. We’ve done a few side 

projects. For example, the 

drinks that Tom mentioned, 

the original idea came from 

them. My job was to bring the 

product to life through pack-

aging design, marketing and 

CULTURE


TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER

INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

OPPOSITE TOP  Michelberger 

Hotel Studio, illustration 

for Intersection Magazine, 

Autumn/Winter 2009

OPPOSITE BOTTOM  Michelberger 

Hotel Studio, beer fridge, 2010

TOP  Exterior signage, 

Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2009


BOTTOM  Michelberger Hotel 

Studio, Music Machine poster, 

2009



294

295


online [promotion]. That took a lot of time. On a day-

to-day basis, every time we have a concert we make 

a poster. The maps. The signage. The bar menu 

changes every six to eight months. Chalkboards. So 

there is the ongoing general hotel work and there 

is also this different work. The hotel is the heart of 

everything. If we don’t have the hotel, we don’t have 

anything. We have to make sure the hotel remains 

at the heart of what we do. The trick is to try and not 

lose the core of what we were originally. 

J.M.V. 

 Do you feel like this is your place for the foresee-

able future?

A.K. 


 It will be interesting when we take the next step. 

I’m trying to create a studio where it extrudes out. 

It will always have a foot in Berlin, but the challenge 

will be to create another space. It will organically 

grow and develop. Whether it is a hotel or a new 

drink or film production, we don’t need to compart-

mentalize. Everyone trusts each other so implicitly. 

We’ve done so much together, proved our strengths 

and weaknesses. This is my life. I’m in until I drop. 

You won’t find anything else like this. There is 

too much potential, opportunity for the future. We 

have freedom. Tom always said that he wanted the 

Michelberger to be a platform for people to do what 

they want to do. And it is that. It is exactly that.

J.M.V. 

 How did you become involved with this project?

ANJA KNAUER 

 Tom and I were friends. I studied film 

and literature at university and I was just finishing. 

I was also working as an actress. He talked to me 

about this idea for a hotel, and I was very interested 

in becoming part of the interior-design team. I had 

no experience with interior design, but I liked his 

vision and he liked my ideas and approach inspired 

by film-set design. Along with Sibylle Oellerich, who 

also has a background in film-set design, we worked 

with Werner Aisslinger collectively. We didn’t study 

architecture, so it was a weakness, but it became our 

strength in the end.

J.M.V. 

 What was the concept?

A.K. 


 The concept was not having a concept. We didn’t 

want it to look like a hotel. We wanted furniture and 

think. At night we change the lights and it becomes 

a proper bar. We thought of it as a place where 

Berliners would want to go to instead of the typical 

hotel bar that is just for hotel guests.

For the restaurant, we liked the idea of people 

sitting at the same table. There are huge, strong 

tables and tiled walls. The only thing that is different 

is the different chairs. We wanted the space to bring 

people together. That’s what happens at lunch and at 

Friday dinners, when we bring out these big pots and 

everyone eats together and meets each other.

The styles of the rooms were very much inspired 

by Werner Aisslinger. Our concept was a new idea of 

room types, from double, to three people, to more, 

whether a family or a band. And we wanted to keep 

the options open, so even if you get a room for two, 

you can bring someone in. We kept the rooms simple 

because we thought they should be filled by the 

identities and spirit of the people who stay in them, 

compared to the public rooms, which show our per-

sonalities. They are basic, with no phones, because 

no one uses them anymore. The small rooms have 

no cupboards because we thought they’d likely be 

used for shorter stays. Now we have more types of 

rooms—The Chalet, The Golden One, The Clever 

One—because we found out people love the individu-

ality. Some people love to have the atmosphere that 

is in the lobby in the room.

objects with a story to reflect the people in the hotel 

and the city, like you would design a room as a set 

designer in order to tell something about the people 

that live in that room.

We wanted the yard, especially in summer, to 

look like typical German Schrebergärten, the little 

fenced gardens you find around the city that look 

old-fashioned. At the moment, it has this 1970s look, 

with flower patterns, potted plants and different 

kinds of chairs and huts.

For the lobby, we thought of a living room where 

you would like to stay longer, not just waiting to 

check in, and where you could have a meeting—but 

a long meeting—and where you would feel comfort-

able hanging out alone, too. It is supposed to be very 

cozy, and we thought of books because they immedi-

ately make things cozy.

We wanted the bar to look like an atelier in the 

daytime, like a working space and a simple space to 

J.M.V. 


 How did you go about sourcing the furniture and 

objects?

A.K. 


 In Berlin, although they are dying breed, there 

are still a lot of places you can get good and beautiful 

stuff for reasonable prices. There are flea markets all 

over, and antique shops. And if you go into the coun-

tryside a bit, you can find old windows and doors. We 

had a car and we were driving around getting stuff.

INTERVIEW

A DIFFERENT KIND OF HOTEL EVOLVES IN BERLIN

CULTURE

TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER



INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

OPPOSITE  Studio Aisslinger, 

bar, Michelberger Hotel, 

Berlin, 2009. Photo by Karina 

Tengberg, 2010

TOP  Studio Aisslinger, bar, 

Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2009

BOTTOM  Studio Aisslinger, 



Luxus Room, Michelberger 

Hotel, Berlin, 2009. Photo by 

James Pfaff, 2010



296

297


J.M.V. 

 Even after the hotel was “complete” you stayed on.

A.K. 


 I love the place and the people working here. 

It feels like home and there are so many interest-

ing opportunities to work creatively and with a lot 

of freedom—that’s the first reason. Another reason 

is because my interior design job never ended. I 

thought my job would be finished when we finished 

the place. But I really underestimated the heavy use 

in a hotel. We built it like a private home. Since we 

didn’t only think in terms of function and use and 

put in so much second-hand furniture and individual 

objects, a lot of stuff breaks and gets stolen and these 

things are not easily replaced by a “mass order.”

The whole place is like an organism. It is alive. 

When things “run away” or “die”, you have to do it 

again. At first, I always wanted to capture something. 

But then I found out that it was fun to do it new and 

all over again.

doing three new suites. One is quite large, sixty 

square metres. We have guests we’d like to offer an 

apartment.

We also recently took over the fourth floor. We 

will do the offices. At the moment we are building 

fifty lampshades on our own. And before we did 

some for the lobby. It’s all stuff for the Michelberger.

I’m also doing communication. I do the blog, 

texting, press, I help market all the new products, 

like the coconut water and the booze. I photograph 

events. It was always my interest to do something 

like this, with my background in film and literature. 

I wanted to write. I also like photography. For me it 

is perfect because I like to do different things. If we 

manage to do our own film production, that would 

interest me, too. I feel like anything is possible. 

J.M.V. 


 It seems like a democratic and organic process.

A.K. 


 What I think is interesting about the hotel is 

that this place is growing with us. You can decide 

J.M.V. 

 Has your role changed?

A.K. 


 I’m still doing everything to do with the interi-

ors from plates to redesigning the rooms. We are 

where you want to go with the place. For me it is 

great to have a creative office where I can go and 

make things happen. There is the space to do that. 

Everyone has his daily work to do, yes, but if we have 

an idea we just do it. As our office is a hotel, there 

is also a lot of inspiration coming from the outside. 

We have people coming for lunch from all the offices 

around us and they can be a part of the process, and 

the same with guests. You meet and together these 

people move along the path with us.

I feel very lucky. This is not so typical. After all 

the stress of opening a hotel, it seemed like there 

would be a point when Tom and Nadine would have 

wanted to settle down. But this never happens. When 

something is done, there is always something else. 

Much of the impulse comes from Tom and Nadine. 

It is rare to always want to keep moving, but they are 

always open to new ideas.

INTERVIEW

A DIFFERENT KIND OF HOTEL EVOLVES IN BERLIN

CULTURE

TOM MICHELBERGER, NADINE MAY, AZAR KAZIMIR AND ANJA KNAUER



INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER M. VOLLAND

OPPOSITE TOP AND BOTTOM  Studio 

Aisslinger, Luxus Room, 

Michelberger Hotel, Berlin, 

2009. Photo by James Pfaff, 

2010


BOTTOM  Studio Aisslinger, The 

Big One, Michelberger Hotel, 

Berlin, 2009. Photo by James 

Pfaff, 2010



Yüklə 85,52 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə