TIES TO ADLER”S TASKS OF LIFE
11
highlight areas of personal development” (Passmore, Holloway & Rawle-Cope, 2010, p. 2).
Personality type can help individuals understand their uniqueness and how to best utilize their
own personality. The fundamentals of the MBTI assessment are based on Carl Jung’ personality
theory and are self-reported based on perceptions. Myers Briggs was a mother-daughter team of
Katharine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers and they expanded Jung’s personality theory into
personality preferences. “The Jungian definition of cognitive style is by far the most widely used
and thoroughly researched, while the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is the most frequently used
instrument for identifying style.” Also “MBTI has become the most widely used personality
measure for nonpsychiatric populations” (Opt & Loffredo, 2010, p. 557). In his article
“Cautionary Comments Regarding the Myers Briggs Type Indicator,” Pittenger (2005) says
“both Jung’s theory and supporters of the MBTI treat personality as an invariant that is set at
birth and tempered by experience” (Pittenger, 2005, p. 212). The same sentiment is shared by
Cummings (1995), “Jung argued that psychological type has a biological foundation and Myers
stated that preferences are inborn and no attempt should be made to reverse them; otherwise
development may be blocked” (p. 2).
There are four indices that combine to create sixteen different composite types. Some
examples include: ISFJ, ENTP, ESFP, and others. These break down into E and I (extraversion
and introversion), S and N (sensing and intuition), T and F (thinking and feeling) and J and P
(judgment and perception) (Bhardwaj, Joshi, & Bhardwaj, 2010, pp. 99-100). Many studies have
come to conclusions about the frequency of these types. Cummings (1995) found 70-75% of the
population prefers extraversion versus introversion, 70-75% prefer sensing rather than intuition,
50% prefer thinking instead of feeling, and 50-65% prefer judgment to perception (p. 2). In his
article, “The Myers Briggs Type Indicator and Career Obstacles” Healy and Woodward (1998)
TIES TO ADLER”S TASKS OF LIFE
12
takes a deeper look into the different types, which reveal differences and distinctions. Introverts
prefer solitude and privacy while extroverts often pay attention to their environment. Individuals
with “sensing” prefer immediate sensation and intuitive individuals are more interested in
possibilities rather than facts. “Thinkers” are analytically oriented and problem solve critically
whereas their counter part the “feeling” type are more attuned to values of others and connect
with people to form networks. The final category is judgment and perception and their
differences lie in decision making. The “judgers” make decisions rather quickly and the
“perceivers” are more curious and explorative (Healy & Woodward, 1998, pp. 2-3).
Strengths Finder
“What are your weaknesses?” This is a typical question at a job interview. Interviewees
are often coached on how to answer this particular question. Sometimes an interviewer might
ask the question, “What are your greatest strengths?” This question holds a pot of gold because
it engages a person in positive thinking. “One cannot build on weakness. To achieve results,
one has to use all the available strengths…These strengths are the true opportunities” (Linley &
Harrington, 2006, p.37).
The recent Strengths Finder 2.0 developed by Donald Clifton is utilized in many markets
ranging from the work place to the living room of any person for their own personal knowledge.
He developed his assessment based off the positive psychology research of Martin Seligman and
Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi. In his article Seligman says;
Positive psychology at the subjective level is about positive subjective experience: well-
being and satisfaction (past); flow, joy, the sensual pleasures, and happiness (present),
and constructive cognitions about the future – optimism, hope, and faith. At the
individual level it is about positive personal traits-the capacity for love and vocation,
TIES TO ADLER”S TASKS OF LIFE
13
courage, interpersonal skill, aesthetic sensibility, perseverance, forgiveness, originality,
future-mindedness, high talent, and wisdom. At the group level it is about civic virtues
and the institutions that move individuals towards better citizenship: responsibility,
nurturance, altruism, civility, moderation, tolerance, and work ethic (Seligman, 2001, p.
3).
Understanding our personality from a strengths foundation also comes from the theories
of Karen Horney and Carl Rogers. Rogers believed “human beings are organismically motivated
toward developing to their full potential, and are striving to become all they can be” (Asplund,
Lopez, Hodges & Harter, 2007, p. 7). Horney believed “the self is forward moving and growth
oriented” (DeRobertis, 2006, p. 184). Both Rogers and Horney agreed that the self is always
working and moving towards “self-actualization.” These theories by Rogers and Horney show
up when Clifton asked the question “what would happen if we studied what is right with
people?” He argued that it was how an individual used their strengths that made the difference
and that our strengths are not affected by our mood.
There are many other definitions of strengths throughout literature. “Strengths are
produced through the refinement of talents with knowledge and skill” and are considered “a
natural capacity for behaving, thinking, or feeling in a way that allows optimal functioning and
performance in the pursuit of valued outcomes” (Linley & Harrington, 2006, p. 39). More often
than not, humans want to work with what they are good at, rather than what they are not.
“Human beings have a natural tendency to want to develop their capacities, to exploit their
natural potential, to become all that they can be” (Linley & Harrington, 2006, p. 40). It is
important to keep all of these factors in mind when taking the Strengths Finder assessment.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |