Sncf infrastructure branch : 3 domains



Yüklə 4,71 Mb.
tarix19.10.2018
ölçüsü4,71 Mb.
#74915



1 | SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH



SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH : 3 DOMAINS



SNCF INFRA MANAGEMENT



2 | THE FRENCH RAILWAY SYSTEM



FRENCH RAILWAY SYSTEM AT A GLANCE



SOME OF THE ACTORS OF THE SYSTEM



3 | THE FRENCH RAILWAY NETWORK



The French Network

  • Total track length

    • UIC 1 à 4 : 19885 km ( included 3839 km HSL )
    • 9969 S & C ( included 754 HSL )
    • UIC 5 et 6 13803 km - 7621 S & C
  • Regional lines

    • with passengers : 11723 km - 4113 S & C
    • without passengers: 4417 km - 2171 S & C
  • Side tracks 14949 km - 46177 S & C



Study of EPFL 2005

  • The study made by EPFL in 2005 showed

    • Bad conditions of the network
    • No optimization of M/R: The share M/R was 2/3;1/3 when it was from 1/2;1/2 up to 1/3;2/3 in other europeen countries
    • No optimization of track possession : According to the EPFL, track possession duration was too short (1h50) and no technically and economically efficient
    • No optimization of traffic control : There were too much signalling boxes


What has be done so far



What has be done



What is going on

  • RFF has defined his strategic vision of the network

    • Definition of freight corridors with high level of availability
    • More accurate definition of the performance of the network according to the different routes, eg:
      • Axel load
      • Speed
      • Gauge
      • Availability
    • Increasing of the slots for TOCs and FOCs
    • Decreasing of maintenance and renewal costs
    • So SNCF has to improve the maintenance policies, in order to have more trains, more availability, as all Infra Managers do.


Maintenance policies

  • These huge requirements lead to

    • An optimization of maintenance and renewal, that means an assessment of the policies on each route based on LCC
    • More efficiency of the renewal
      • Longer zones
      • Uniformization
      • Planning
    • The necessity of planning and reducing maintenance costs; the best way is to move from an « on condition » based maintenance to a predictive maintenance


Predictive maintenance

  • To do that,it is necessary:

    • To have a good knowledge of the conditions of the network
    • To know the parameters which have an impact on the behaviour of the components of the infrastructure
    • To know the degradation’s laws of these components according to the sollicitations they have to support
    • In order to plan the interventions


Predictive maintenance

  • The knowledge of the degradation’s laws,eg:

  • Track circuits components



Tools

  • Development and implementation of measurement cars

    • IRIS 320 already in operation
    • Purchase of new measurement cars for conventional lines
  • Development and implementation of tools in order to modelize the degradation’s laws and so to define « what to do » and « when to do » eg:

    • Contact wire wear measurement and planning of replacement (with « Catalyse »)
    • Track geometry quality measurement and planning of tamping (with « TIMON »)


Contact wire wear measurement



Contact wire wear analyse CATALYSE



CATALYSE



TIMON HSL 1



TIMON Conventional Line Paris-Le Havre



Remote control

  • Development and implementation of remote control for level crossings Signalling and S & C in 3 Supervision Centers (Paris, Lyon,Pagny/Moselle)



Maintenance methods

  • Implementation of new methods of maintenance for a higher durability of the interventions eg:

    • Tamping in BAS
    • Grinding
    • Tamping and grinding


Optimization Maintenance/Renewal



Models of maintenance costs



Models of maintenance costs





Yüklə 4,71 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə