SocLap sap – working draft


Actions under Objective 4 – Fill key knowledge gaps



Yüklə 433,38 Kb.
səhifə10/11
tarix17.11.2018
ölçüsü433,38 Kb.
#80469
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11

Actions under Objective 4 – Fill key knowledge gaps

Result

Action

Priority

Timescale

Responsibility

    1. The necessary data and information required to make an informed assessment of the conservation status of N. a. suschkini is obtained.




4.1.1. Conduct coordinated surveys on breeding grounds to (1) identify the delimitations of the breeding distribution, (2) identify whether there are areas of intergradation with N. a. orientalis (i.e. a hybrid zone), and (3) produce a revised breeding population estimate.

Applicable to: Kazakhstan & Russia.



Other

Short

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.1.2. Undertake migration studies using satellite-tagging to identify (1) key migration routes, (2) possible staging and stopover sites and (3) the wintering range.

Applicable to: Kazakhstan & Russia.



Other

Short

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.1.3. Informed by the results of satellite tagging, coordinate follow-up surveys to assess the potential importance of staging, stopover and wintering sites.

Applicable to: Subsequent Range States that emerge to be of importance for N. a. suschkini.



Other

Medium

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.1.4. Informed by the above, undertake an assessment of threats throughout the life cycle and identify subsequent conservation and research priorities.

Applicable to: Kazakhstan, Russia and subsequent Range States that emerge to be of importance for N. a. suschkini.



Other

Medium

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.1.5. Set up an appropriate monitoring programme that will enable sufficient data collection to produce future population trends (e.g. repeat surveys at a sample of breeding sites and/or regular monitoring at non-breeding sites that emerge to be of importance to N. a. suschkini).

Applicable to: Kazakhstan, Russia and subsequent Range States that emerge to be of importance for N. a. suschkini.



Other

Medium

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.2. The necessary data and information required to provide a better understanding of N. a. arquata and N. a. orientalis populations in Russia is obtained.


4.2.1. Design a suitable sampling methodology (e.g. repeat surveys at a sample of breeding sites) and/ or undertake analysis of Russian Atlas data to provide improved breeding population estimates and trends for both N. a. arquata and N. a. orientalis in Russia.

Applicable to: Russia.



Other

Short

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions

      1. Undertake a programme of migration studies using satellite-tagging of birds on breeding grounds to:

  • Identify the key migration routes and the wintering locations of both subspecies (this will be complementary to Action 6.1. which will undertake similar work in Europe).

  • Identify the extent of overlap between N. a. arquata and N. a. orientalis breeding ranges.

  • Identify the migratory divides that exists on Russian breeding grounds between N. a. orientalis populations that overwinter in Africa and the Middle East, those that winter in South Asia, and those using the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.

Applicable to: Russia.

Other

Short to Medium

Government conservation agencies and NGOs

      1. Undertake a research project to assess the impact of large-scale land abandonment in European Russia on N. a. arquata (and other species).

Applicable to: Russia.

Other

Short to Medium

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions

4.3. Survey, monitoring and research activities on N. a. arquata are undertaken to address knowledge gaps and improve population and demographic estimates.


4.3.1. Undertake migration studies using satellite-tagging to improve understanding of population connectivity across Europe and West Africa (this will be complementary to Action 5.2. which will undertake similar work in Russia).

Applicable to: All Range States (except Russia) that host breeding and non-breeding N. a. arquata.



Other

Short-medium

Government conservation agencies and NGOs

4.3.2. Obtain improved estimates for survival rates and productivity by expanding ringing effort, ring reporting, and maintenance of necessary databases (with particular emphasis on populations that spend part of the life cycle in France – see Objective 7).

Applicable to: All Range States (except Russia) that host breeding and non-breeding N. a. arquata.



Other

Short-medium

Government conservation agencies, NGOs & EURING

4.3.3. Support the expansion of productivity monitoring schemes at important breeding sites across the breeding range, so as to gain a better understanding of how productivity varies across the range.

Applicable to: All Range States (except Russia) that host breeding N. a. arquata.



Other

Continuous

Government conservation agencies & NGOs

4.4. The impact of other poorly-understood threats is investigated

4.4.1. Further investigate the impact of wind farms on local breeding populations. Address current knowledge gaps including the cumulative impact of multiple wind farms and the population response both during construction and post-construction. Studies should also investigate productivity and potential changes in predation pressure arising from wind farms.

Applicable to: All Range States with breeding populations and increasing numbers of wind farms.



Other

Medium to long

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions

4.4.2. Investigate the impact of pollution at wintering sites on adult and juvenile survival rates and subsequent breeding success.

Applicable to: Any non-breeding Range States.



Other

Medium to long

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions

4.4.3. Undertake a study that investigates the impact of disturbance on daily energy budgets and individual survival.

Applicable to: Any non-breeding Range States.



Other

Medium to long

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions

4.4.4. Investigate the effectiveness of all mitigation techniques designed to offset the loss or degradation of breeding habitat.

Applicable to: Any breeding Range States.



Other

Medium to long

Government conservation agencies, NGOs and academic institutions


5. IMPLEMENTATION
International coordination of the implementation of International Single Species Action Plans is a key factor in their successful realization. To ensure the coordination of this Action Plan following its adoption, the UNEP/AEWA Secretariat will convene an inter-governmental AEWA Eurasian Curlew International Working Group once a suitable coordinating agency or organization has been identified. The Working Group will consist of government representatives from all range states as well as national experts, designated by the respective governing bodies charged with the implementation of AEWA. In addition, relevant international conservation and hunting organizations as well as other international stakeholders with a vested interest in the species can be invited to join the Working Group as observers.
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Amar, A., Redpath, S. Sim, I. & G. Buchanan. 2010. Spatial and temporal associations between recovering populations of common raven Corvus corax and British upland wader populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 253-262.

Austin,  G.E., Calbrade,  N.A., Mellan,  H.J., Musgrove,  A.J., Hearn,  R.D., Stroud, D.A., Wotton, S.R. & Holt, C.A. 2014. Waterbirds in the UK 2012/13: The Wetland Bird Survey. BTO/RSPB/JNCC, Thetford.http://www.bto.org/volunteer-surveys/webs/publications/webs-annual-report

Baillie, S.R., Marchant, J.H., Leech, D.I., Massimino, D., Eglington, S.M., Johnston, A., Noble, D.G., Barimore, C., Kew, A.J., Downie, I.S., Risely, K. & Robinson, R.A. 2013. BirdTrends 2012: trends in numbers, breeding success and survival for UK breeding birds. Research Report 644. BTO, Thetford. http://www.bto.org/birdtrends

Bainbridge, I.P. & Minton, C.D.T. 1978. The migration and mortality of Curlew in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 25: 39-50.

Baines, D. 1989. The effects of improvement of upland, marginal grasslands on the breeding success of Lapwings Vanellus vanellus and other waders. Ibis 131: 497-506.

Balmer, D., Gillings, S., Caffrey, B., Swan, B., Downie, I. & Fuller, R. 2013. Bird Atlas 2007-11 The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. British Trust for Ornithology.

Bamford, M., Watkins, D. Bancroft, W. Tischler, G. & Wahl, J. 2008. Migratory shorebirds of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway: population estimates and internationally important sites. Wetlands International - Oceania, Canberra.

Beintema, A.J. & Visser, G.H. 1989. The effect of weather on time budgets and development of chicks of meadow birds. Ardea 77:181-192.

Belik, V. P. 1998. Current population status of rare and protected waders in south Russia. International Wader Studies 10: 273-280.

Berg, Ǻ. 1992a. Habitat selection by breeding Curlews Numenius arquata on mosaic farmland. Ibis 134: 355-360.

Berg, Ǻ. 1992b. Factors affecting nest-site choice and reproductive success of Curlews Numenius arquata on farmland. Ibis 134: 44-51.

Berg, Å. 1993. Food resources and foraging success of curlews Numenius arquata in different farmland habitats. Ornis fennica 70(3): 22-31.

Berg, Å. 1994. Maintenance of populations and causes of population changes of Curlews Numenius arquata breeding on farmland. Biological Conservation 67: 233-238.

BirdLife International. 2004a. Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12).

BirdLife International. 2004b. Birds in the European Union: a status assessment. BirdLife International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

BirdLife International and NatureServe. 2013. Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USA.

BirdLife International. 2014a. Important Bird Areas factsheet: Arquipélago dos Bijagós. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 15/12/2014

BirdLife International. 2014b. Important Bird Areas factsheet: Banc d'Arguin National Park. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 15/12/2014

BirdLife International. 2015. European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Publications of the European Communitie

Boschert, M. 1992. Organochloro-residues in the clutches of the Curlew Numenius arquata from a breeding area in the southern Rhine Valley. Ecology of Birds 14: 101-111.

Boschert, M. 2001. Großer Brachvogel – Numenius arquata. In: Hölzinger, J., & M. Boschert (eds.): Die Vögel Baden-Württembergs. Band 2.2.- E. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.

Boschert, M. 1993. Auswirkungen von Modellflug und Strassenverkehr auf die Raumnutzung beim Grossen Brachvogel (Numenius arquata). Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 2:11-18.

Boschert, M. & Rupp, J. 1993. Brutbiologie des grossen Brachvogels Numenius arquata in einem Brutgebiet am südlichen Oberrhein. Die Vogelwelt 5: 199-221.

Boschert, M. 2004. Der Große Brachvogel (Numenius arquata [Linnaeus 1758]) am badischen Oberrhein - Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen für einen umfassenden und nachhaltigen Schutz. – Dissertation (PhD-Thesis) Universität Tübingen.

Brown, D.J., Crockford, N.J. & Sheldon, R. (comp.) 2014. Drivers of population change and conservation priorities for the Numeniini populations of the world. BirdLife International/International Wader Study Group.

Broyer, J. & Roche, J. 1991. The nesting population of Curlew Numenius arquata in the Saone basin. Alauda 59: 129-135. (in French)

Burton, N.H.K., Armitage, M.J.S., Musgrove, A.J. & Rehfisch, M.M. 2002. Impacts of man-made landscape features on numbers of estuarine waterbirds at low tide. Environmental Management 30(6):857-864.

Cao, L., Zhang, J., Barter, M. & Lei, G. 2009. Anatidae in eastern China during the non-breeding season: geographical distributions and protection status. Biol. Conservation. 143: 650-659.

Cotter, G. 1990. The Curlew. C. I. Thomas & Sons (Haverfordwest) Ltd., Dyfed.

Cramp, S. & Simmons, K.E.L. 1983. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume 3: Waders to Gulls. University Press, Oxford.

Crowe, O. & Holt, C. 2013. Estimates of waterbird numbers wintering in Ireland, 2006/07 – 2010/11. Irish Birds 9:4.

Currie, D., Valkama, J., Berg, Ǻ., Boschert, M., Norrdahl, K., Hänninen, M., Korpimäki, E., Pöyri, V. & Hemminki, O. 2001. Sex roles, parental effort and offspring desertion in the monogamous Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata. Ibis 143: 642-650.

Davidson, N.C. & Rothwell, P.I. 1993. Disturbance to waterfowl on estuaries: conservation and coastal management implications of current knowledge. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68: 97-106.

De Fouw. J. et al. in prep. Counts of shorebirds at Barr al Hikman, Oman 2008 and 2013; results comparisons and discussion.

De Jong, A. & Berg, Å. 2001. Storspoven i Sverige. Resultat av riksinventeringen 1999. Vår Fågelvärld 60(2): 6-16. (in Swedish).

De Jong, A. 1990. Häckande storspovar i Hössjödalen 1985-90 – Hur mår Västerbottens landskapsfågel? Fåglar i Västerbotten 15(3): 98-100. (in Swedish).

De Jong, A. 2012. Matching a Changing World – the Importance of Habitat Characteristics for Farmland Breeding Eurasian Curlew. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Umeå.

De Jong, A. 2012. Seasonal sift of foraging habitat among farmland breeding Eurasian Curlews Numenius arquata. Doctoral Thesis. Ornis Norvegica 35: 23-27.

Denker, E. & Buthe, A. 1995. PCB burden and pattern in eggs of the Curlew (Numenius arquata) and the Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa) from north-west Germany. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 55(6): 886-892.

Delany, S., Scott, D., Dodman, T. & Stroud, D. 2009. An Atlas of Wader Populations in Africa and Western Eurasia. Wetlands International.

Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. 1996. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 3: Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.

Dornberger, W. & Ranftl. H. 1986. Breeding populations of Curlew, Redshank and Blacktailed Godwit in northern Bavaria (West Germany) 1977-1986. Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern 25: 189-194. (In German).

Douglas, D.J.T., Bellamy, P.E., Stephen, L.S., Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Wilson, J.D. & Grant, M.C. 2014. Upland land use predicts population decline in a globally near-threatened wader. J. Appl. Ecol. 51(1):194-203.

Donaghy, A. & Mellon, C. 1998. Fields for the Future: Towards the Conservation of Farmland Birds in Northern Ireland. RSPB, Sandy.

Duriez, O., Ens, B.J., Choquet, R., Pradel, R. & Klaassen, M. 2012. Comparing the seasonal survival of resident and migratory oystercatchers: carry-over effects of habitat quality and weather conditions. Oikos 121: 862–873.

Elts, J., Leito, A., Leivits, A., Luigujõe, L., Mägi, E., Nellis, Rein, Nellis, Renno, Ots, M., Pehlak, H. 2013. Status and numbers of Estonian birds, 2008−2012. Hirundo 26(2): 80-112. URL: http://www.eoy.ee/hirundo/file_download/149/Elts_et_al_2013_2.pdf

Eriksen, J. & Victor, R. 2013. Oman Bird List, Edition 7

Ewing, S., Scragg, E., Butcher, N. & Douglas, D. 2012. Investigating displacement effect of wind farms on Curlew using GPS tracking technologies: a pilot study. Unpublished report.

Ferns, P.N., Rostron, D.M. & Siman, H.Y. 2000. Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 464–474.

Fitzpatrick, S. & Bouchez, B. 1998. Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviour of waders on a rocky beach. Bird Study 45: 157-171.

Foundation Voorne Bird Observatory. Bird records from the website: http://www.radioactiverobins.com/snipeswaders/steppe%20curlews%20num%20arq%20sschkini.htm

Fouquet M. 2013. Plan National de Gestion (2014-2018) – Courlis cendré (Numenius arquata). ONCFS.

Fletcher, K., Aebischer, N.J., Baines, D., Foster R. and Hoodless, A.N. 2010. Changes in breeding success and abundance of ground-nesting moorland birds in relation to the experimental deployment of legal predator control. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 263-272.

Flint, V.E., Boehme, R.L., Kostin, Y.V. & Kuznetsov, A.A. 1984. A field guide to the birds of the USSR. Princetown University Press, Princetown, New Jersey

Galbraith, H., Murray, S., Duncan, K., Smith, R., Whitfield, D. P. & Thompson, D. B. A. 1993. Diet and habitat use of the dotterel Charadrius morinellus in Scotland. Ibis 135: 148-155.

Gardner, R. C., Bonells, M., Okuno, E., Zarama, J. M. 2012. Avoiding, mitigating, and compensating for loss and degradation of wetlands in national laws and policies. Ramsar Scientific and Technical Briefing Note no. 3. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat

Gill, F & D Donsker (Eds). 2015. IOC World Bird List (v 5.2). Accessed on 29 May 2015 from http://www.worldbirdnames.org/bow/buttonquail/

Grant, M., Orsman, C., Easton, J., Lodge, C., Smith, M., Thompson, G., Rodwell, S. & Moore, N. 1999. Breeding success and causes of breeding failure of curlew Numenius arquata in Northern Ireland. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 59-74.

Grant, M.C. 1997. Breeding curlew in the UK: RSPB research and implications for conservation. RSPB Conservation Review 11: 67-73.

Green, R. E. 1985. The Management of Lowland Wet Grassland for Breeding Waders. RSPB.

Gunnarsson, U. & Löfroth, M. 2009. Våtmarksinventeringen – resultat från 25 års inventeringar. Nationell slutrapport för våtmarksinventeringen (VMI) I Sverige. Naturvårdsverket rapport 5925 (januari 2009). (in Icelandic).

Hagemeijer, E.J.M. & Blair, M.J. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Adundance. T & AD Poyser, London.

Holt, C.A., Austin, G.E., Calbrade, N.A., Mellan, H.J., Hearn, R.D., Stroud, D.A., Wotton, S.R. & Musgrove, A.J. 2012. Waterbirds in the UK 2010/11: The Wetland Bird Survey. BTO/RSPB/JNCC, Thetford. 183 pp.

Hayman, P. Marchant, J. & Prater, A. J. 1986. Shorebirds. Croom Helm, London

Harris, S.J., Risely, K., Massimino, D., Newson, S.E., Eaton, M.A., Musgrove, A.J., Noble, D.G., Procter, D. & Baillie, S.R. 2014. The Breeding Bird Survey 2013. BTO Research Report 658. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford.

Haworth, P.F. & Thompson, D.B.A. 1990. Factors associated with the breeding distribution of upland birds in the South Pennines, England. Journal of Applied Ecology 27: 562–577.

Henderson, I.G., Wilson, A.M., Steele, D. And Vickery, J.A. 2002. Population estimates, trends and habitat associations of breeding Lapwings Vanellus vanellus, Curlew Numenius arquata and Snipe Gallinago gallinago in Northern Ireland in 1999. Bird Study 49: 17-25.

Hötker, H., Jeromin, H. & Melter, J. 2007. Monitoring grassland waders breeding in Germany. Wader Study Group Bulletin 113: 57–65.

Hötker, H., Schrader, S., Schwemmer, P., Oberdiek, N., Blew, J., Evans, R. & Lass-Evans, S. 2010. Status threats and conservation of birds in the German Wadden Sea. NABU Technical Report, Druckhaus Berlin-Mitte, Berlin.

Huntley, B., Green, R.E., Collingham, Y.C. & Willis, S.G. 2007. A climatic atlas of European breeding birds. Durham University, The RSPB and Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

Yüklə 433,38 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə