SocLap sap – working draft

Isenmann P., Benmergui M., Browne P., Ba A.D., Diagana C.H., Diawara Y. & El Abidine ould Sidaty Z. (2010). Birds of Mauritania - Oiseaux de Mauritanie. Société d'Etudes, Ornithologiques de France, Paris.

Jensen, F.P. & Lutz, M. 2006. Management Plan for Curlew (Numenius arquata) 2007-2009, Natura 2000 Technical Report-003-2007 under the Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild bird. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Johnsgard, P. A. 1981. The plovers, sandpipers and snipes of the world. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, U.S.A. and London.

Kipp, M. 1999. Zum bruterfolg beim GroBen Brachvogel (Numenius arquata). LOBF-Mitteilung 3/99: 47-49. (in German)

Kipp, M. 1982. Ergebnisse individueller Farbberingung beim Großen Brachvogel und ihre Bedeutung für den Biotopschutz. Beih. Veröff. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad. Württ. 25: 87-96. (in German)

Kurlavičius, P. and Raudonikis, L. 1999. Assessment of the Lithuanian breeding bird abundance. Ciconia, Vol. 7: 52-57.

Kurlavičius, P. and Raudonikis, L. 2001. Assessment of the Lithuanian breeding bird abundance, 1999-2001. Ciconia, Vol. 9: 92-97.

Kurlavičius, P. (ed.) 2006. Lithuanian Breeding Bird Atlas. Lututé, Kaunas, Lithuania. [In Lithuanian with English summary.]

Kılıç D.T. & Eken, G. 2004.Türkiye’nin önemli kus alanları—2004 güncellemesi (Important bird areas in Turkey—2004 update). Ankara: Doga Dernegi.

Klok, T.C., Roodbergen, M. & Hemerik, L. 2009. Diagnosing declining grassland wader populations using simple matrix models. Anim. Biol 59:127–144

Lappo, E.G., Tomkovich, P.S. & Syroechovskiy, E.S. 2012. Atlas of the Breeding Waders in the Russian Arctic. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Lauder, C. & Donaghy, A. 2008. Breeding Waders in Ireland 2008: A review and recommendations for future action. Report to the National Parks & Wildlife Service.

Lebedeva, E. A. & Butiev, V. T. 1998. Summer movements of waders in the Samur river delta: preliminary data and review of the problem for the Caspian Sea region. International Wader Studies 10: 395-402.

Mischenko, A. L. 2004. Estimation of numbers and trends for birds of the European part of Russia. Moscow,

Mulder, J.L. & Swaan, A.H. 1992. Body-weight changes of egg-laying Curlews Numenius arquata, as monitored by an automatic weighing system. Ardea 80: 273-280.

Musgrove, A.J., Aebischer, N.J., Eaton, M.A., Hearn, R.D., Newson, S.E., Noble, D.G., Parsons, M., Risely, K. & Stroud, D.A. 2013. Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. British Birds 106: 64-100.

Smart, M. & Coutts, K. 2004. Footdrain management to enhance habitat for breeding waders on lowland wet grassland at Buckenham and Cantley Marshes, Mid-Yar RSPB Reserve, Norfolk, England. Conservation Evidence 1: 16-19.

Maclean, I.M.D., Austin, G.E., Rehfisch, M.M., Blew, J., Crowe, O., Delany, S., Devos, K., Deceuninck, B., Gunther, K., Laursen, K., van Roomen, M. & Wahl, J. 2008. Climate change causes rapid changes in the distribution and site abundance of birds in winter. Global Change Biol. 14: 2489–2500.

Nagy, S. Flink, S. & Langendoen, T. 2014. Waterbird trends 1988-2012: Results of trend analyses of data from the International Waterbird Census in the African-Eurasian Flyway. Wetlands International, Ede.

Navedo, J.G. & Herrera, A.G. 2012. Effects of recreational disturbance on tidal wetlands: supporting the importance of undisturbed roosting sites for waterbird conservation. J. Coast. Conserv. 16: 373-381.

NFUS press release 2014. www.nfus.org.uk/news/2014/march/rural-development-measures-must-deliver

O’Brien, M.G. 2004. Estimating the number of farmland waders breeding in the United Kingdom. International Wader Studies 14: 135:139.

O’Brien, M.G. & Wilson, J. 2011. Population changes of breeding waders on farmland in relation to agri-environment management. Bird Study 58:4, 399-408.

ONCFS. 2000. Enquête nationale sur les tableaux de chasse à tir. Saison 1998–1999. Bulletin Technique et Juridique, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage 251: 1–216.

Oriental Bird Club. Bird records from the website: http://orientalbirdimages.org/birdimages.php?action=birdspecies&Bird_ID=1224&Bird_Image_ID=68023&Bird_Family_ID

Palomino, D. & B. Molina (Eds). 2009. Aves acuáticas reproductoras en España. Seguimiento de Aves 26: pp 210. SEO/BirdLife. Madrid. (in Spanish).

Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Stephen, L., Langston, R.H.W., Bainbridge, I.P. & Bullman, R. 2009. The distribution of breeding birds around upland wind farms. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1323-1331.

Pearce-Higgins, J. & Grant, M. 2006. Relationships between bird abundance and the composition and structure of moorland vegetation. Bird Study 53: 112–125.

Peitzmeier, J. 1952. Oekologische Umstellung und starke Vermehrung des Grossen Brachvogels (Numenius arquata L.) im CberE:m Emmsgebiet. Natur und Heimat 12: 3, 1-4.

Perennou, C., Mundkur, T., Scott, D.A., Follestad, A. & Kvenild, L. 1994. The Asian Waterfowl Census 1987-91: Distribution and Status of Asian Waterfowl. AWB Publication No. 86. IWRB Publication No. 24. Asian Wetlands Bureau, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia & IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.

Pfeifer, R. & Brandl, R. 1991. The timing of meadow-mowing and its influence on birds. Ornithologischer Anzeiger 30: 159-171.

Porter, R., Samraoui, B., Livet, J., Mallon, D. & Budd, K (eds). 2008. Proceedings of the 10^th Conservation Workshop for the Fauna of Arabia: Shorebirds of the Arabian Peninsula.

Ratcliffe, D. 2007. Galloway and the Borders (New Naturalist 101). Collins, London.

Rehfisch, M.M., Austin, G.E., Freeman, S.N., Armitage, M.J.S. & Burton, N.H.K. 2004. The possible impact of climate change on the future distributions and numbers of waders on Britain’s nonestuarine coast. Ibis 146: 70–81.

Reichenbach M. 2001. Windenergie und Wiesenvögel-wie empfindlich sind die Offenlandbrüter? Windernergie und Vögel-Ausmaß und Bewältigung eines Konflikts. Tagungsband 2. Fassung: 52-76.

Roos, S., Smart, J. & Gibbons, D. 2012. The predation of wild birds in the UK: an updated review (2007-2011) of its conservation impact and management. RSPB Research Report No. 50. ISBN 978-1-905601-39-4.

Robinson , R.A. 2005. Birdfacts: Profiles of Birds Occurring in Britain and Ireland (BTO Research Report 407). BTO, Thetford.

Roodbergen, M., van der Werf, B. & Hötker, H. 2012. Revealing the contributions of reproduction and survival to the Europe-wide decline in meadow birds: review and meta-analysis. Journal of Ornithology 153: 53-74.

Sach, G. 1968. Die Mauser des Grossen Brachvogels (Numenius arquata). Journal of Ornithology 109: 485-511.

Scott, D.A. (ed). 1995. A directory of wetlands in the Middle East. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, Slimbridge, UK.

Shimmings, P. & Øien, I.J. 2015. Bestandsestimater og trender for norske hekkefugler. NOF-Rapport 2015-2

Smit, C. & Visser, G.J.M. 1993. Effects of disturbance on shorebirds: a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area. Wader Study Group Bulletin 68: 6-19.

Smit, C.J. & Piersma, T. 1989. Numbers, midwinter distribution and migration of wader populations using the East Atlantic Flyway. In: Boyd, H. & Pirot, J.-Y. (eds) Flyways and reserve networks for water birds. IWRB Special Publication No.9. IWRB Slimbridge.

Snow, D. W.; Perrins, C. M. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic vol. 1: Non-Passerines. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Stillman, R.A. & Brown, A.F. 1994. Population sizes and habitat associations of upland breeding birds in the South Pennines, England. Biol. Conserv. 69: 307–314.

Strann, K.B. 1993. Wintering Curlews Numerius arguata at 70 dg. N in North Norway. Wader Study Group Bulletin 71: 32–33.

Stroud, D. A., Reed, T. M. & Harding, N. J. 1990. Do moorland breeding waders avoid plantation edges? Bird Study 37: 177-186.

Stroud, D.A., Davidson, N.C., West, R., Scott, D.A., Haanstra, L., Thorup, O., Ganter, B. & Delany, S. (compilers) on behalf of the International Wader Study Group. 2004. Status of migratory wader populations in Africa and Western Eurasia in the 1990s. International Wader Studies 15: 1-259.

Svorkmo-Lundberg, T., Bakken, V., Helberg, M., Mork, K., Røer, J.E. & Sæbø, S. (editors). 2006. Norsk vinterfuglatlas. Norsk ornitologisk forening, Trondheim. Norway. (In Norwegian.)

Taylor, R.C. & Dodd, S.G. 2013. Negative impacts of hunting and suction-dredging on otherwise high and stable survival rates in Curlew Numenius arquata. Bird Study 60(2): 221-228.

Thorup, O. (comp.). 2006. Breeding waders in Europe 2000. International Wader Studies 14. International Wader Study Group, UK.

Tiainen, J. 2001. The Finnish agricultural environments. In: Pitkänen, M. & Tiainen, J. (eds.), Biodiversity of agricultural landscapes in Finland. BirdLife Finland Conservation Series 3, pp. 9-12.

Tiainen, J. & Pakkala, T. 2001. Birds. In: Pitkänen, M. & Tiainen, J. (eds.), Biodiversity of agricultural landscapes in Finland. BirdLife Finland Conservation Series 3, pp. 33-50.

Trolliet, B. & Fouquet, M. 2004. Wintering waders in coastal Guinea. Wader Study Group Bull. 103: 56-62

Trösch, S. 2003. Der Grosse Brachvogel als zunehmender Wintergast im Bodenseegebiet. Ergebnisse der simultanen Schlafplatzzählungen in den Wintern 1999 – 2002 und Beobachtungen zum Verhalten. Eigenverlag, S. Trösch, Stetten, Schweiz.

Tuellinghoff, R. & Bergmann, H. 1993. Curlew habitats in Lower Saxony: preferred and avoided structures in the agricultural landscape. Vogelwarte 37: 1-11. (In German).

Urban, E. K.; Fry, C. H.; Keith, S. 1986. The birds of Africa vol. II. Academic Press, London

Underhill, L. G. 1997. The atlas of southern African birds. Vol. 1. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg.

Valkama, J. & Currie, D. 1999. Low productivity of Curlews Numenius arquata on farmland in southern Finland: Causes and consequences. Ornis Fennica 76: 65-70.

Valkama, J., Currie, D. & Korpimäki, E. 1999. Differences in the intensity of nest predation in the Curlew Numenius arquata: A consequence of land use and predator densities? Ecoscience 6(4): 497-504.

Valkama, J., Robertson, P. & Currie, D. 1998. Habitat selection by breeding curlew (Numenius arquata) on farmland: the importance of grassland. Ann. Zool. Fennici 35: 141-148.

Van Gils, J. & Wiersma, P. 1996. Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) 2014. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Accessed on 29 May 2015 from http://www.hbw.com/node/53897

van Roomen, M., van Winden, E. & Langendoen, T. 2014. The assessment of trends and population sizes of a selection of waterbird species and populations from the coastal East Atlantic Flyway for Conservation Status Report 6 of The African Eurasian Waterbird Agreement.

Vickery, J.A., Tallowin, J.T, Feber, R.E., Asteraki, E.J., Atkinson, Fuller, R.J. & Brown, V. 2001. Effects of grassland management on birds and their food resources, with special reference to recent changes in fertiliser, mowing and grazing practices in lowland Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 647–664.

Warnock, N. 2010. Stopping vs. Staging: the difference between a hop and a jump. J. Avian Biol. 41: 621-626.

Wernham, C.V., Toms, M.P., Marchant, J.H., Clark, J.A., Siriwardena, G.M. & Baillie, S.R. (eds). 2002. The Migration Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland. T. & A.D. Poyser, London. pp 332-335.

Wetlands International. 2003. Strategy and Action Plan for Mire and Peatland Conservation in Central Europe. Danish National Museum and Wetlands International. Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Wetlands International & ONCFS. 2010 Limicoles séjournant en France. pp 50.

Wetlands International & ONCFS. 2011 Limicoles séjournant en France. pp 52.

Wetlands International & ONCFS. 2012 Limicoles séjournant en France. pp 50.

Witt, H. 1989. Auswirkungen der Extensivierungsförderung auf Bestand und Bruterfolg von Uferschnepfe und Großem Brachvogel in Schleswig-Holstein. Berichte der Deutschen Sektion des Internationalen Rates für Vogelschutz 28: 43-76. (in German).

1^ 1% of a species or biogeographic population is the minimum population threshold required for a site to be considered of international importance under criterion 6 of the Ramsar Convention.

2^ whilst not implied in the population’s name, the wintering range described in WPE5 for the “Western Siberia/SW Asia E & S Africa” population is described as’ SW Asia, E & S Africa (few SW Africa)’.

3^ Note that access to the original sources was not available for most EU range states.

4^ Note that the AEWA ISSAP format categorises threat ranks quantitatively. Knowledge of the quantitative impact of particular threats on populations of Eurasian Curlew is highly variable. In some instances, no quantitative data is available at all. In such instances, threats are categorised as ‘unknown’, together with a best guess as to their rank, if one can be made. Such instances would be displayed as e.g. ‘unknown/local’ which would donate that the impact is unknown, but experts believe it is only having a local impact.

5^ Grant et al. (1999) studied a mainland and an island population. In terms of implications for the wider breeding range, the results from the mainland site are likely to be more representative of breeding sites across the majority of the global range, as mammalian predators were present (unlike at the island site).

6^ IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A taxon is Near Threatened (NT) when it has been evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU) now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the future. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22693190/0)

7^ AEWA Status of the Populations of Migratory Waterbirds. “A4” in Table 1 of the AEWA Action Plan denotes a species listed as Near Threatened (NT) by the IUCN. “A3c” in Table 1 of the AEWA Action Plan denotes a population numbering between 25,000 and around 100,000 individuals and considered to be at risk as a result of showing a significant long-term declines. “A1c” in Table 1 of the AEWA Action Plan denotes a population with less than 10,000 individuals. http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/appendices_e.pdf

8^ The Convention on Migratory Species. Species listed on Appendix II represent migratory species with an unfavourable conservation status that would benefit from international co-operation organised by tailored agreements. http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/cms_app1_2.htm

9^ Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. Species listed on Appendix II are protected. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/104.htm

10^ Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. Species listed on Annex II/2 can be hunted in listed Member States which have a defined hunting season for the species

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32009L0147:EN:NOT

11^ As defined by Article 1 of the Convention on Migratory Species.

12^ The order of objectives does not reflect any level of priority

13^ For each subspecies, population thresholds for internationally important sites are those containing > 1% of the biogeographic population (Table 1).

14^ For details, see Gardner et al. 2013 (available online at http://ramsar.rgis.ch/bn/bn3.pdf)

15^ For each subspecies, population thresholds for internationally important sites are those containing > 1% of the biogeographic population: see table 1.

16^ Notify Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in the Arabian Peninsula that were identified as important staging and wintering sites for N. a. orientalis in Proceedings of the 10^th Conservation Workshop for the Fauna of Arabia: Shorebirds of the Arabian Peninsula (Porter et al. 2009) as Ramsar Sites.

17^ For details, see Gardner et al. 2013 (available online at http://ramsar.rgis.ch/bn/bn3.pdf)