value, the idea around which you reframe how the customer thinks about
their business—must be scalable and repeatable, and as such, must be
created by the organization (in most organizations,
this is the job of
marketing).
The same can be said for parts of tailoring. While there is a clear role
for the individual rep on the tailoring front, namely, recognizing how to
modify the teaching message for different individuals across the customer
organization, the organization has an important responsibility when it
comes to tailoring as well. First, organizations
can leverage business
intelligence and research assets to help developing Challengers better tailor
their messages to each customer’s industry and company context. The
organization also bears the responsibility for identifying which teaching
messages will resonate with which stakeholders. A one-size-fits-all teaching
message is unlikely to be tenable for most suppliers, aside from those who
sell in a single line of business to a highly homogeneous set of customers.
Yet individual customer stakeholder
segmentation at this level, again, is just
as much an organizational capability as it is an individual skill.
If tailoring is half individual/half organizational, the only component of
the Challenger model that can truly be called a
largely
individual skill is
taking control. Here is where rep upskilling
will pay significant dividends,
and in
chapter 7
we will explain the best way to drive this behavior into the
front line. However, it is worth noting that even here, the organization has a
role to play. Namely, Challenger reps armed with powerful teaching
messages produced by their organizations will be in a much better position
to take control of the customer conversation. As well,
our recent research
shows that the organization plays an important role in equipping reps to
identify and properly engage with the right stakeholders on the customer
side—an important part of taking control of the sale.
Dostları ilə paylaş: