out”—the words kept repeating in my head. How many children had Peter
stolen, how many had died, how many had been
thinned out? Peter himself
said,
“To die will be an awfully big adventure.”
There is certainly no lack of bloodletting in
Peter Pan: pirates
massacring
Indians and so forth, but those are adults killing each other—
nothing new there. Much more intriguing to me is that murderous group of
children—the Lost Boys. With them, Peter Pan has turned bloodletting into
a sport, has taught them not only to kill without conscience or remorse but
also to have a damn good time doing it. At one point the boys proudly
debate the number of pirates they’d just slaughtered: “Was it fifteen or
seventeen?” And how can any child not enjoy such lines as “They fell easy
prey to the reeking swords of the boys.” Or “He lifted up one boy with his
hook, and was using him as a buckler, when another, who had just passed
his sword through Mullins, sprang into the fray.”
Nothing like a good
spilling of entrails to liven things up. And more chilling is Peter’s ability to
do all these things—the kidnapping, the murder—all without a trace of
conscience:
“‘I forget them after I kill them,’ he (Peter) replied carelessly.”
Once I pondered these unsettling elements I began to wonder what this
children’s book would be like if the veil of Barrie’s
lyrical prose were
peeled back, if the violence and savagery were presented in stark, grim
reality. How would children really react to being kidnapped and thrust into
such a situation? How hard would it be for them to fall under the spell of a
charismatic sociopath, to shuck off the morality of civilization and become
cold-blooded killers? Judging from what goes on in modern gang culture,
and seeing how quick teens can be to define their own morals, to justify any
action no matter how horrific, I believe it wouldn’t be that hard.
And these thoughts were the seeds for
The Child Thief.
Dostları ilə paylaş: