The Information Society: Claims and Arguments Information Society Also Referred to as

The Information Society: Claims and Arguments

Information Society

• Also Referred to as :

• Post-Industrial Society
• Knowledge Society
• Network Society
• Informational Society
• Information age

Post Industrial Society

• The concept was popularized by Daniel Bell (through his 1973 work 'The Coming of Post-Industrial Society'), and is closely related to similar concepts such as information society, knowledge economy, post-industrial economy, liquid modernity, and network society.

• Post-industrial society is a concept in economics describing when the service sector produces more wealth than the industrial or manufacturing sector in some countries.

Information Society - Views

• Equated to a Society with High penetration of ICT infrastructure

• Equated to a Network Society

• Equated to Society where information is an important resource / commodity for every aspect of Life

• Equated to a society where members of the Society have access to information

• Equated to a society where people have universal access to information

Information Society - Views

• Equated to a society where the economic activities and jobs revolve around /driven by information

• Equated to a society where work has a bent towards the services industry as opposed to production based (e.g. industrial, agricultural) industry

Criteria for Identifying an Information Society

• From the proponents of the Information Society, it is possible to distinguish analytically five definitions of an information society, each of which presents criteria for identifying the new.

• These are

• technological,
• economic,
• occupational,
• spatial, and
• cultural

Technological

Technological

• More sophisticated versions of this technological route to the information society attend to the convergence and overlapping of telecommunications and computing.

• They argue that cheap information processing and storage technologies (computers) lead to extensive distribution.
• One of the major areas thus impacted is telecommunications, notably switching centers, which, in being computerized, in effect merge with the general development of computing and impel still more dramatic improvement of information management and distribution.
• This unification is especially fortuitous because the widespread dissemination of computers means that, for optimum use, they require connection.
• In short, the computerization of telecommunications means that, increasingly, computer can be linked to computer, hence the prospect of links between terminals within and between offices, banks, homes, shops, factories, schools, the globe itself.

Technological

• Objections to technological definitions of the information society:

• If technology is the main criterion for defining a society, then why not just call the emerging era a high-tech society or an automated age?
• Given the variety of ways to describe a society in which IT predominates—silicon society, cybernetic society, robotic age—why choose to designate it an information society?
• If technology is the key, then why is the prefix "information" attached?
• in this society now, how much IT is there and how far does this take us toward qualifying for information society status?
• How much IT is required in order to identify an information society?
• At what point on the technological scale is a society judged to have entered an Information Age?
• this is unavoidably technologically determinist—in that technology is regarded as the prime social dynamic - but also it relegates into an entirely separate division social, economic, and political dimensions of technological innovation, which follow from, and are subordinate to the technology that appears to be self-perpetuating.
• However, technology is not aloof from the social realm in this way. On the contrary, it is an integral and, indeed, constitutive part of the social.

Economic.

• There is an established subdivision of economics that concerns itself with the economics of information.

• As early as the 1960s, management guru Peter Drucker was contending that knowledge had become the foundation of the modern economy as we have shifted "from an economy of goods [to]... a knowledge economy."
• Today it is commonplace to argue that we have evolved into a society where the "distinguishing characteristic...is that knowledge and organization are the prime creators of wealth.“

• However, there are difficulties with the economics of information approach.

• One is that, behind the weighty statistical tables that are resonant of objective demonstration, there is a great deal of hidden interpretation and value judgment as to how to construct categories and what to include and exclude from the information sector.
• At what point on the economic graph that one enters an information society – is it when 50 percent of GNP is dedicated to informational activities?

Occupational

• A popular measure of the emergence of an information society is the one that focuses on occupational change.

• Put simply, the contention is that we have achieved an information society when the predominance of occupations is found in information work. That is, the information society has arrived when clerks, teachers, lawyers, and entertainers outnumber coal miners, steelworkers, dockers, and builders.
• For instance, two influential OECD publications produced figures from all member countries, signaling "continued growth...in those occupations primarily concerned with the creation and handling of information and with its infrastructure support.
• Daniel Bell sees in the emergence of a white collar society (and, hence, information work) and the decline of industrial labour, changes as profound as the end of class-based political conflict, more communal consciousness, and the development of equality between the sexes.

A major problem with this perspective concerns the methodology for allocating workers to particular categories.

• A major problem with this perspective concerns the methodology for allocating workers to particular categories.
• The end product—a bald statistical figure giving a precise percent age of information workers—hides the complex processes by which researchers construct their categories and allocate people to one or another.
• Porat, developed an influential typology to locate occupations that are primarily engaged in the production, processing, or distribution of information.
• Jonscher argued for two sectors of the economy: the first, an information sector, is where people whose prime function is creating, processing, and handling information; the second, a production sector, is where workers are found who chiefly create, process, and handle physical goods.

Occupational

• Difficulties with the perspective

• stating precisely who is an information worker and who is not is a risky proposition since every occupation involves a significant degree of information processing and cognition
• It has to be said that counting the number of information workers in a society tells us nothing about the hierarchies—and associated variations in power and esteem—of these people.
• It could be argued that the crucial issue has been the growth of computing and telecommunications engineers, since these may exercise a decisive influence over the pace of technological innovation.
• A similar, perhaps even greater, rate of expansion in social workers to handle problems of an aging population and increased family dislocation and juvenile delinquency may have little or nothing to do with an information society, though undoubtedly, social workers would be classified with IT engineers as "information workers."
• Indeed, as a proportion of the population, the groups emphasized upon, while having expanded, remain distinct minorities— never more than 20 or 25 percent of the workforce.

Spatial

• The spatial conception of the information society, while it draws on sociology and economics, has at its core the geographer’s distinctive stress on space.

• Here the major emphasis is on the information networks that connect locations and, in consequence, have dramatic effects on the organization of time and space.

Spatial

• Goddard (1991) identifies four interrelated elements in the transition to an information society.

• Information is coming to occupy center stage as the key strategic resource on which the organization of the world economy is dependent. The modern world demands the coordination of globally distributed manufacture, planning across and between sovereign states, and marketing throughout continents. Information is axial to these diverse activities and, thus, is of heightened importance in the contemporary world.
• Computer and communications technologies provide the infrastructure that enables information to be processed and distributed. These technologies allow information to be handled on an historically unprecedented scale, facilitate instantaneous and "real-time" trading, and monitor economic, social, and political affairs on a global stage.
• There has been an exceptionally rapid growth of the tradable information sector of the economy, by which Goddard means to highlight the explosive growth of services, such as new media (satellite broadcasting, cable, video) and online databases providing information on a host of subjects ranging from stock market dealings, commodity prices, patent listings, and currency fluctuations to abstracts of scientific and technological journals.

Spatial

• Complementing these developments has been the radical reorganization of the world’s financial system, which has resulted in the collapse of traditional boundaries that once separated banking, brokerage, financial services, credit agencies and the like.
• Inside this bewildering world of high finance—which few people understand and still fewer appear able to control—circulates, in electronic form, dazzling sums of capital (one estimate suggests there are $2 trillion Eurodollars in the system, though there were none just over a generation ago).
• The growing "informatization" of the economy is facilitating the integration of national and regional economies

• Added together, these trends—the strategic importance of information, the establishment of an IT infrastructure, the growth of tradable information, and global integration—emphasize the centrality of information networks, linking together locations within and between towns, regions, nations, continents, and the entire world.

• In short, the constraints of space have been dramatically limited, though certainly not eliminated. And simultaneously, time has itself been shrunk as contact is immediate via computer communications and telecommunications. This "time/space compression," as Giddens terms it, provides corporations, governments, and even individuals with hitherto unachievable options.

Spatial

• Yet we may still ask: Why should the presence of networks lead analysts to categorize societies as information economies?

• When is a network a network? Is it two people speaking to one another by telephone, or computer systems transmitting vast data sets through a packet switching exchange; is it when an office block is "wired," or when terminals in the home can communicate with local banks and shops?

• The question of what actually constitutes a network is a serious one, and it raises problems not only of how to distinguish between different levels of networking, but also of how we stipulate a point at which we have entered a network/information society.

Cultural.

• The final conception of an information society is perhaps the most easily acknowledged yet the least measured.

• Each of us is aware, from the pattern of our everyday lives, that there has been an extraordinary increase in the information in social circulation.

• Television has been in extensive use for over 30 years in the West, but now programs run round-the-clock.

• There is much more radio output available now than even a decade ago, at the local, national, and international levels.

• Radios are no longer fixed in the front room, but spread through the home, car, office, and with the Walkman, everywhere.

• Movies have long been an important part of peoples’ information environment and indeed, attendance at cinemas has declined significantly. But movies today are more prevalent than ever: available at cinema outlets, broadcast on television, readily borrowed from video rental shops, and cheaply purchased from the shelves of chain stores. Walk along any street and it is almost impossible to miss the advertising hoardings, the billboards, the window displays in shops.

• Books and magazines In addition, audio tape, compact disc, and radio all offer more, and more readily available, music, poetry, drama, humor, and education to the general public.

• Newspapers are extensively available, and a good many new titles fall on our doorsteps as free sheets.

• Junk mail is delivered daily

Cultural

• All of this testifies to the fact that we inhabit a media-laden society, but the informational features of our world are more thoroughly penetrative than a short list of television, radio, and other media systems suggests.

• This intrusion of information into the most intimate realms of home, bedroom, and body is complemented by the growth of institutions dedicated to investing everyday life with symbolic significance.

• One thinks of the global advertising business, of publishing empires, of the fashion industry, of worldwide agencies of media production that bring to the domestic scene reflections of our own ways of life and images of other lifestyles, thereby presenting us with alternative meanings that may be absorbed, rejected, and reinterpreted, but all the while adding to the vocabulary of the symbolic environment.

• Contemporary culture is manifestly more heavily information laden than any of its predecessors.

• We exist in a media-saturated environment, which means that life is quintessential about symbolization, about exchanging and receiving—or trying to exchange and resisting reception of—messages about ourselves and others.

• It is in acknowledgment of this explosion of signification that many writers conceive of our having entered an information society

• Reviewing these varying definitions of the information society, what becomes abundantly clear is that they are either underdeveloped or imprecise, or both.

• Whether it is a technological, economic, occupational, spatial, or cultural conception, we are left with highly problematical notions of what constitutes, and how to distinguish, an information society.

• Most definitions of the information society offer a quantitative measure (numbers of white collar workers, percentage of GNP devoted to information, etc.) and assume that, at some unspecified point, we enter an information society when this condition begins to predominate.

• But there are no clear grounds for designating as a new type of society one in which all we witness is greater quantities of information in circulation and storage. If there is just more information, then it is hard to understand why anyone should suggest that we have before us something radically new

Quality and Quantity

• The blunt point is that quantitative measures—simply more information—cannot of themselves identify a break with previous systems, while it is at least theoretically possible to regard small but decisive qualitative changes as marking a system break.

• After all, just because there are many more automobiles today than 30 years ago does not qualify us to speak of a "car society."

• What is especially odd is that so many of those who identify an information society as a new type of society do so by presuming that this qualitative change can be defined simply by calculating how much information is in circulation, how many people work in information jobs, and so on.

• What we have here is the assumption that quantitative increases transform, in unspecified ways, into qualitative changes in the social system.

• THE END