(1) “The self” is not anything other than the five skandhas (individually or collectively considered). (1) “The self” is not anything other than the five skandhas (individually or collectively considered). (2) None of the skandhas is permanent. Therefore (3) “The self” is not permanent.
Can this Buddhist view of a transcendent Self be reconciled with the anatta doctrine? Can this Buddhist view of a transcendent Self be reconciled with the anatta doctrine?
So the Buddhist anatta doctrine may be compatible with the conception of Atman affirmed in Advaita Vedanta, namely a single, pure undifferentiated consciousness. This may explain why bhakti vedantins accused Sankara of being a crypto-Buddhist.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |