To what exten do you agree or disagree with this statement?

We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.

To what exten do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments and individuals should only focus on people in their own countries. I strongly believe any governments must assume the responsibility of helping citizens in other countries as much as they can.

Why administrations must not aid to poorer countries? This is totally regretful topic. Nowadays around 30 per sent countries in the world need special attention because of poverty and some war situations. In consequence that variety of infections disease come into existence and might spread around the globe. In such a difficult situation, developed countries should help to troubled ones. For example, in 2014, hundreds of US and UK doctors and nurses were sent to African countries to heal from Ebola. In this case if developed nations did not help to Africans, Ebola virus would spread all over the world. So, personally I think everywhere and everytime mutual aid is the best option.

There is also one thing we have to pay attention that we have an obligation to help those who live beyond our national borders. In some countries the problems that people face are much more serious than those in our society. For instance, when poorer chidren of cities are dying from illness individuals in richer nations can save lives simly by carrying for vaccines that already exist.

In conclusion, there is no denying that we can not assist everyone in the earth, but we should help penniless and helpless people as much as we can.

(251 words)
Written by Akbarjon