Uzbekistan Doing Business 2020

Extent of ownership and control index (0-7)
: Corporate
transparency on ownership stakes, compensation, audits and
financial prospects
•
Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7)
: Sum of the
extent of shareholders rights, extent of ownership and control
and extent of corporate transparency indices
•
Extent of shareholder governance index (0–20)
: Sum
of the extent of conflict of interest regulation and extent of
shareholder governance indices
•
Strength of minority investor protection index (0–50)
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, a case study uses several assumptions about
the business and the transaction.
- Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the economy’s most important stock exchange.
- Has a board of directors and a chief executive officer (CEO) who may legally act on behalf of
Buyer where permitted, even if this is not specifically required by law.
- Has a supervisory board in economies with a two-tier board system on which Mr. James
appointed 60% of the shareholder-elected members.
- Has not adopted bylaws or articles of association that go beyond the minimum requirements.
Does not follow codes, principles, recommendations or guidelines that are not mandatory.
- Is a manufacturing company with its own distribution network.
The business (Buyer):
- Mr. James owns 60% of Buyer, sits on Buyer’s board of directors and elected two directors to
Buyer’s five-member board.
- Mr. James also owns 90% of Seller, a company that operates a chain of retail hardware stores.
Seller recently closed a large number of its stores.
- Mr. James proposes that Buyer purchase Seller’s unused fleet of trucks to expand Buyer’s
distribution of its food products, a proposal to which Buyer agrees. The price is equal to 10% of
Buyer’s assets and is higher than the market value.
- The proposed transaction is part of the company’s principal activity and is not outside the
authority of the company.
- Buyer enters into the transaction. All required approvals are obtained, and all required disclosures
made—that is, the transaction was not entered into fraudulently.
- The transaction causes damages to Buyer. Shareholders sue Mr. James and the executives and
directors that approved the transaction.