Character for Leadership
29
development of self-identity (‘who I am’) and self-regulation (i.e., the ability to
delay gratification,
resist peer pressure, and act courageously)” (p. 241). Character
includes “the ability to think effectively while emotions of fear, greed, pity,
disappointment, and so forth, are raging” (p. 242),
indicating the ability to
demonstrate sound judgment, as well as the capability “of making decisions that
consider the common good of society or individuals within an organization as well
as their own parochial or selfish interests” (p. 243).
Character is a component of
personality and the capacity of the self that facilitates the exercise of good
judgment and the display of moral development.
Temperament, the second component of personality, is relatively stable over
time. In fact, Costa and McCrae (1994) argued that one’s temperament is “set like
plaster” after age 30.
In contrast, one’s character is subject to change, particularly
with traumatic experiences (Sympson, 2000).
Cloninger, Svrakic, and Pryzbeck (1993), in describing individuals with
healthy
personalities, coalesced the essential dimensions of character to three: self-
directedness, cooperativeness, and self-transcendence. These three components
essentially correspond with Leonard’s (1997) model. These three components also
correspond to the three domains that must be considered
to insure ethical decision-
making processes—theories about one’s self, others, and the surrounding world
(Messick & Bazerman, 1996). Though measured individually,
it is the combination
of traits—both self-directedness and cooperativeness—that is necessary to consider
one’s character mature (Cloninger, Przybeck, et al., 1994).
Dostları ilə paylaş: