Chapter5:Georg Simmel
Georg Simmel (1858-1918) Wealthy family Popular in US, which is where his work was of great importance to the birth of sociology His ideas weren’t welcomed by scholars in Germany Disliked his style of writing
Learning Objectives After reading this chapter, students should be able to: name the four levels of concern in Simmel's thought; provide examples of forms and types of social interaction from Simmel's work; explain how group size and social distance affect social interaction; describe the role of social structure and objective culture in Simmel's thought; provide a Simmelian analysis of the role of money in society, describing how money affects value, how money facilitates the rationalization of society, and the negative effects of money on social life; define the tragedy of culture; outline the main criticisms of Simmel's work
Chapter Outline I. Primary Concerns B. Levels and Areas of Concern C. Dialectical Thinking D. Fashion E. Individual Culture and Objective Culture F. More-Life and More-Than-Life II. Social Interaction ("Association") A. Interaction: Forms and Types B. Social Geometry 1. Numbers a. dyad and triad b. group size
2. Distance C. Social Types 1. The Poor 1. Superordinate and Subordinate 2. Social Forms and Simmel's Larger Problematic III. Objective Culture V. The Philosophy of Money A. Money and Value B. Money, Reification, and Rationalization C. Negative Effects VI. Tragedy of Culture A. The Tragedy of Culture in Its Broader Context VII. Criticisms IX. Summary
Background Simmel’s first effort at a dissertation was rejected and one of his professor’s said that they would do him a great service if they did not encourage him any further. In 1855 he became a private lecturer in Berlin where he lectured on a wide variety of subjects and became extremely popular among his students and the cultural elite from Berlin. Simmel wrote over a hundred essays and a large number of volumes
Background It was nearly thirty years before Simmel was offered the position as a professor of philosophy in Strasbourg Simmel faced slow advancement in academic rank compared to his great reputation as a speaker and a thinker because: - He was of Jewish decent and was victimized by anti-Semitism
- His ideas attracted students and cultural elites but they were not welcomed by senior scholars in Germany who favored heavy topics: the book mentioned that they may have been jealous of Simmel…
Georg Simmel Simmel thought that his work was misunderstood and even went as far to say that it was his fate for his work to be misunderstood - His work mostly centered on the positive: a deeper insight into the world and spirit
Simmel was very active in cultural events in Berlin; Cofounder of “German Society of Sociology” with Weber and Teonnies Married to a woman named Gertrud who published works herself on subjects such as religion and sexuality
Influences Darwin and Spencer - Spencer-evolutionary and differentiation
- Darwin- superiority ( not species battle for superiority, but more human battle for superiority)
Kant- “how society is possible” to explain how nature was possible Marx- self- alienation to apply to dualism of life
Concepts and Contributions Rejected “organic” theories of Comte and Spencer Society is not an abstract creation
“Formal Sociology” Society as a process - Society is real “patterns”
Unique events throughout history share a series of patterns Groups Studied patterns that make these events happen or as he coined it “forms” “Forms” can be organizations, relationships, rules that impact and govern the individuals of a society In connection with “forms” he studied “contents” - Contents are considered to be the drives, interests, purposes that drive individual behavior
Social Types Simmel created “social types” which characterized different individuals within a society Each type needs to be present in order for society to exist Examples of types include: “the stranger”, “the spendthrift”, “the mediator”, “the adventurer”, “the renegade”背叛者, and “the poor”
Dialectical Thinking Facts and values Rejects concrete dividing lines between social phenomena World is best understood in term of conflict
Social Geometry Simmel sought to understand the make-up and bond within social relationships Dyad - A relationship that involves two individuals
- Ex. Best friends, lovers, married couples
- A dyad represents the strongest bond
- No formal structure within the relationship
- Each experience by either individual impacts the other
- The relationship ceases to exist if either member departs
Social Geometry cont. Triad - A social group consisting of three equal members
- Indirect relationship that can both assist and hinder reciprocity within the group
- The group can survive if one member drops out, thus forming a new dyad
- The introduction of the third person, can help and hinder the relationship of other group members
- This person can become a mediator, can use the group to advance their own selfish agenda, and can use existing conflict to divide the group and take it over
Superordination and Subordination The most important relationship that can exist is that of the leader and the followers - This relationship must be reciprocal
- Followers must be in a position to follow all rules set forth by the leader
- Certain personal freedoms must always be afforded to followers in order for the leader to be successful
- This relationship must be structured as a dyadic affiliation, if a third member is introduced the structure is immediately weakened
Secrecy and The Secret Society Secrecy, according to Simmel, is one of man’s greatest achievements In order to form a relationship secrets must be shared amongst members, but certain elements will always remain secret By exposing secrets to another, we place ourselves at risk of betrayal Secret Society is a shared confidence in secrets communally known - As these societies increase in size greater awareness is placed on hierarchy and rituals performed by members to show allegiance
- Examples include: Elks Lodge, Free Masons, Fraternities, and Sororities
Philosophy of Money Simmel’s thoughts on money are still very relevant and often quoted even today Money is a social tool - Once money is introduced it represents a growth of the sophistication of the society
Money creates distance from objects, but at the same time provides a means to attain the object thus overcoming that distance Simmel was concerned with the problem of money in society and tribulations created by money - These problems were the result of a larger issue going on within the greater society itself
Exchange Exchange is the purest form of human interaction In all exchanges someone is giving up certain material or value they have attained for something entirely different Value + Exchange = inseparable Value is determined by comparing it to an object that has already been assessed with a value
Mass Culture- “ Metropolis and Mental Life” Isn’t a concept but is reflected by his works Tension 1.Emotional Reserve- self- protected device to shield an individual from urban life - Maintain a certain emotional distance
2. Attachment to Personal Freedom- emotional indifference individuals in a metropolitan area exhibit to one another 3. Extreme Individuality- metropolitan individual needs do something drastic in order to attract social attention
Relevancy Macro- level Simmel paid little attention to social structure Showed society as a real entity, and not merely an abstraction. Forms do exist and are subject to systematic analysis Creation of social types are forms of interactions Superordinate/subordinate (employee/boss) Philosophy of money- economic system of exchange
Dostları ilə paylaş: |