Comments on Corrosion R&D Needs for DCLL B.A. Pint and P.F. Tortorelli Presented by S.J. Zinkle US ITER-TBM Meeting Idaho Falls, ID August 10-12, 2005
Compatibility in the DCLL system will likely involve multiple materials In-vessel TBM - ferritic/martensitic steel, SiC FCI
External piping Tritium processing - Refractory alloy??, tritium permeation barrier materials??
Heat exchanger
Dissolution - Numerous phenomena can affect mass transfer across metal-liquid interface, J=k (C0-C)
- Laminar vs. turbulent flow (including magnetic field effects)
- Solubility temperature dependence
Impurity and interstitial transfer - Very important for refractory metals (and BCC metals in general)
Alloying between the liquid metal and solid - Typically eliminated early on in selection process (showstopper)
- Often most relevant for ceramics (e.g., SiC insert)
The last three mechanisms can be roughly evaluated using low-cost capsule experiments; the 1st mechanism requires flowing loop tests
There are two major contributors to dissolution mass transfer Static isothermal mechanisms - Capsule tests can provide initial data on solubilities (infinite dilution steady-state approximation)
- Rate-controlling steps include surface reaction, liquid-phase diffusion through boundary layer, and solid state diffusion
Current knowledge of candidate materials for DCLL system is largely limited to static capsule tests Substantial experimental database on ferritic steel compatibility with flowing Pb-Li - Comprehensive analysis of existing data is needed
Database for other materials generally does not include information for nonisothermal flowing systems and effects of magnetic fields Very little is known about potential stress corrosion cracking mechanisms
Concluding remarks Need to establish reference design (materials, operating conditions) asap Near-term compatibility R&D activities would focus on analysis of existing compatibility for ferritic/martensitic steel with flowing Pb-Li - Also continue limited number of static capsule tests on candidate piping materials (possibility to avoid coatings or ceramic inserts)
- Thermal convection loop
- Other loops?
Scoping experiments on stress-corrosion cracking should also be initiated in the near- to medium-term
Chemical Analyses of the Pb-Li Revealed Little Reaction With SiC after 1000h
Specialized Capsule Experiments Have Been Used For SiC Exposures In Pb-17Li
Negligible Change In Specimen Mass Before Or After Cleaning Was Observed
Corrosion-Resistant Metallic Coatings for Pb-17Li At highest temperatures at and near first wall, SiC flow channel inserts can provide protection Ducting behind this more likely to be made of conventional steels Pb-17Li is quite corrosive toward certain ferrous and Ni-based alloys at temperatures above 450°C One possible solution to ducting protection is corrosion-resistant aluminized coatings on strong conventional alloys: aluminide surface layers should be stable in Pb-17Li (Hubberstey et al., Glasbrenner et al.)
316 SS Results Can Be Understood Based On Fundamental Dissolution Driving Force Dissolution continues until saturation is reached For specimens of 316 SS, saturation is reached sooner in a 316 SS capsule because both are contributing solute (mainly Ni) Fe or Mo capsules are relatively inert
Examination Of Cross Sections Confirmed Some Dissolution Had Occurred in Stainless Steel
Nickel Depletion Was Observed in Stainless Steel
Aluminide-Formers Showed Little Mass Loss And Tended To From Stable, Protective Al-Rich Layers
Qualitative Analysis Indicated These Surface Layer Were Rich in Al and O (Likely Al2O3)
Example Cycle Efficiency as a Function of Interface FS/Pb-17Li Temperature
Dostları ilə paylaş: |