Immagini + Colonna sonora



Yüklə 5,91 Mb.
tarix05.10.2018
ölçüsü5,91 Mb.
#72229





















Immagini + Colonna sonora

  • Immagini + Colonna sonora

  • Dialoghi + Colonna sonora

  • Immagini + Dialoghi











Hypothesis

  • Hypothesis

    • FTC/TDF with ATV/r, RAL, or DRV/r will be equivalent in terms of virologic efficacy and tolerability over 96 weeks
  • Primary Endpoints*

    • Time to HIV-1 RNA >1000 c/mL wk 16 to before wk 24, or >200 c/mL at or after wk 24 (VF)
    • Time to discontinuation of randomized component for toxicity (TF)
  • Pre-planned Composite Endpoint

    • The earlier occurrence of either VF or TF in a given participant


Equivalence shown if 97.5% CI on the pairwise difference in 96-week cumulative incidence falls entirely within -10% and +10%.

  • Equivalence shown if 97.5% CI on the pairwise difference in 96-week cumulative incidence falls entirely within -10% and +10%.

  • If equivalence not demonstrated, superiority shown if 97.5% CI excludes zero.

















ATV/r, RAL, and DRV/r were equivalent for virologic efficacy

  • ATV/r, RAL, and DRV/r were equivalent for virologic efficacy

  • ATV/r was less well tolerated than DRV/r or RAL

    • Largely due to cosmetic hyperbilirubinemia
  • RAL was superior to both PI/r regimens for combined tolerability and virologic efficacy

    • DRV/r was superior to ATV/r
  • VF with resistance was rare

    • More frequently observed with RAL
  • Analyses are ongoing to evaluate:

    • Cardiovascular, metabolic, skeletal, fat, inflammatory biomarkers, behavior, adherence, and key subgroup differences




Testo testo, testo

  • Testo testo, testo































CKD is associated with higher risk of AMI and CVA

  • CKD is associated with higher risk of AMI and CVA

    • HR for AMI: 2.41 (95% CI: 1.73-3.36)
    • HR for CVA: 1.80 (95% CI: 1.44-2.24)










Phase III, randomised, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority, strategic trial

  • Phase III, randomised, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority, strategic trial

  • 78 sites, 15 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden)



Primary endpoint : Time to failure, as the first occurrence of any of the following components:

  • Primary endpoint : Time to failure, as the first occurrence of any of the following components:

  • Virological

    • V1. change of treatment before W32 because of insufficient virologic response
      • HIV-1 RNA reduction < 1 log10 c/ml by W18*
      • or HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 c/ml at W24*
    • V2. HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 c/ml at W32*
    • V3. HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 c/ml at any time after W32*
    • Clinical
    • C1 death due to any cause
    • C2. any new or recurrent AIDS defining event**
    • C3. any new serious non AIDS defining event**
  • All patients followed-up until last patient reached W96, events recorded until end of F-U

  • Non-inferiority margin: absolute difference of at most 9% for the failure rate of RAL vs. TDF/FTC by W96 (estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods) in the ITT analysis

  • Major secondary endpoints: safety, changes in CD4 and HIV RNA, genotypic resistance

















In this well powered, open-label randomised study

  • In this well powered, open-label randomised study

  • Overall twice daily RAL was well tolerated and had comparable efficacy to once daily TDF/FTC, when co-administered with once daily DRV/r, over 96 weeks in first-line ARV therapy

    • Primary endpoint incidence over 96 weeks was 17.4 % (RAL) vs. 13.7 % (TDF/FTC); adjusted absolute difference was 3.7%
    • The upper 95% CI of 8.6% was below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin
    • In a planned subgroup analysis of the outcome for patients with low CD4 (<200/mm3) RAL + DRV/r was inferior to TDF/FTC + DRV/r
  • Comparable safety between the 2 strategies

    • Similar rate of SAE, Grade 3-4 AE, AE leading to treatment modification
  • Treatment-emergent resistance was seen in 5/28 (RAL) vs. 0/13 (TDF/FTC) patients with available genotype at failure

  •  RAL + DRV/r represents an alternative option to TDF/FTC + DRV/r for first line therapy, particularly in patients with CD4 > 200/mm3



Anamnesi

  • Anamnesi

  • Esame obiettivo

  • Algoritmi interpretativi

  • Studio laboratoristico

  • Studio morfometrico, QUS, DXA









Yüklə 5,91 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə