Massachusetts/ Rhode Island dispersant pre-authorization policy august 1995 dispersant pre-authorization policy



Yüklə 130,75 Kb.
tarix06.05.2018
ölçüsü130,75 Kb.
#41695



Massachusetts/ Rhode Island

DISPERSANT PRE-AUTHORIZATION POLICY

August 1995
DISPERSANT PRE-AUTHORIZATION POLICY

PURPOSE


Sec. 1, This policy addresses the pre-authorization of the use of chemical dispersants for the purpose of responding to oil spills in the coastal waters of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the State of Rhode Island, and the United States, as a means of reducing the overall impact of such spills on coastal habitats and marine fauna.

SCOPE


Sec. 2, This policy covers the marine waters off the coasts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the State of Rhode Island, extending seaward of the high water line to the outermost extent of the Exclusive Economic Zone.

ZONES


Sec. 3, The waters addressed in this policy, as defined above, will be delineated into two zones.

Conditional Approval Zone

(a) The use of any chemical agent in response to an oil spill in the coastal waters of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the State of Rhode Island within two nautical miles of the mainland or of designated islands (designation is addressed in Sec. 3, SpecialConsideration Areas) or has a mean low water depth of less than forty (40) feet will require approval under the methods and restrictions set forth in the latest National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (40 CFR Part 300, Subpart J), unless otherwise pre-authorized.

Pre-Authorized Zone

(b) The use of chemical dispersants as listed in the most recent version of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Product Schedule in response to an oil spill in the coastal waters of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and/or the State of Rhode Island, and/or the waters subject to the authority of the U.S. Coast Guard Captains of the Port, Boston, Massachusetts and Providence, Rhode Island, which are seaward of two nautical miles of the mainland or of designated islands and have a mean low water depth of greater than forty (40) feet is pre-authorized under the supervision of the Pre-designated Federal On-Scene Coordinator with restrictions set forth below.

Special Consideration Areas

(1) Special Consideration Areas (SCA's) may be designated and described in writing by the Natural Resources Trustee (or his/her designated representative) for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the State of Rhode Island, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Department of the

Interior; or the manager of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.



  1. Special Consideration Areas will consist of restrictions imposed on the use of chemical dispersants for a specific geographic area to be described in this policy (Annex A). These restrictions may range from outright prohibition to a requirement for consultation prior to deployment of the chemicals. They may be spatial, seasonal or species-specific in nature. Each Special Consideration Area submitted by the above mentioned individuals shall describe the specific restrictions to be applied on the use of chemical dispersants, including, as applicable, primary and alternate point-of-contact telephone numbers.

  1. Changes to any aspect of the Special Consideration Areas will be submitted, in writing, to the Chairperson of the appropriate Area Committee and will take effect thirty (30) days following receipt by the Chairperson. Upon receipt, the Chairperson shall forward copies of these changes, as soon as practical, to the membership of that Area Committee and to the Co-Chairpersons of the Region One Regional Response Team.

POLICY REVIEW

Sec. 4, This plan, along with the Special Consideration Areas in Annex A will be reviewed by the affected Area Committees annually at the first meeting of the full Area Committee following January 1.

DETERMINATION OF EEFECTIVENESS

Sec. 5 (a) The Pre-Designated Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSQ

with authority over the oil spill in question will determine the

effectiveness of the dispersant during the time of application. This


effectiveness test will be conducted visually and qualitatively by the

use of qualified and trained oil spill observers. Qualified observers


will be individuals with oil observation experience from the FOSC's

staff, the USCG National Strike Force, the NOAA Scientific Support Team or those identified by the FOSC at the time of the response. These individuals will conduct overflights to determine if the oil is being effectively dispersed. If it is determined by the FOSC, based on

the report of the observers mentioned above, that the chemical dispersant is having minimal effect, application of that chemical dispersant will cease.

(b) If an authorized chemical dispersant application has been halted and conditions change which contribute positively to the effectiveness of re-application (for example, if a new release event occurs or weather conditions change), the FOSC, following consultation with his or her scientific support team, may attempt a

new application of the chemical dispersant. This new application will be subject to the same effectiveness monitoring as described above.

DISPERSANT MONITORING PROTOCOL

Sec. 6 (a), As agreed upon by the Region One Regional Response Team, the FOSC will follow the Dispersant Monitoring Protocol, as outlined in Annex B. An inability to implement this plan in a timely manner will not revoke the FOSC's pre-authorization to apply chemical dispersants. However, the FOSC should make every attempt to implement this plan as soon as practical.

(b) As soon as practical, a post-application biological monitoring plan will be developed as a section of Annex B and will be implemented routinely following the use of dispersants. An inability to implement this plan in a timely manner will not revoke the FOSC pre-authorization to apply chemical dispersants. However, the FOSC should make every attempt to implement this plan as soon as practical.

NOTIFICATION

Sec. 7 (a) If a decision has been made by the FOSC to use chemical dispersants under the provisions of this policy, the FOSC, as soon as practical, will notify the Region One Concurrence Network, as set forth in the most recent version of the Federal Region One Oil & Hazardous Substances Pollution Emergency Contingency Plan, of that decision.

(b) If chemical dispersants are used as described in this policy or
for the protection of human life, the FOSC will hold a post incident

debriefing within forty-five (45) days after dispersant application to gather information concerning the effectiveness of the chemical agent used and to determine whether any changes to this agreement are necessary. This debriefing should include, but is not limited to, the Region One Concurrence Network, the Scientific Support

Coordinator, and the State On-Scene Coordinator (SOSC), or their

representatives. The results of the debrief will be included in the


FOSC report.

Special Consideration Areas

For MA/RI Dispersant Pre-authorization Policy

Summary: (see original letters for details)



Area/Situation:

Additional Condition:

Submitted by:

Dispersant types other than
Corexit 9527 or 9500

Not pre-authorized (Other stockpiled

dispersants must receive specific


Section 7 approval from USF&WS and NMFS before they may be pre- authorized).

NMFS Section 7 conducted on 9527 and 9500, F&WS Section 7 conducted only on "Corexit formulations"

All pre-approval areas

Implementation of the 6-point

Dispersant Monitoring Protocol,


USF&WS Region 5 Bioassay protocol,

and physiochemical data collection

(temp, salinity, conductivity, pH) at

each sampling location. (AST with


EPA ERT may be able to provide such monitoring)

USF&WS Service Section 7 (see 8/22/96 memo) was conducted on an internal F&WS pre-approval policy

(see 5/18/96 memo) that

requires the mentioned
conditions.


Areas where baleen whales

are present and feeding

Suspend dispersant application

NMFS

(See 8/2/96 Section 7 letter)



Jeffreys Ledge between
5/1—9/30

Consultation with NMFS

NMFS

(See 8/2/96 Section 7 letter)



Stellwagen Bank between
5/1—11/15

Consultation with NMFS and SBNMS Manager

NMFS. (See 8/2/96 Section 7 letter)

Great South Channel
between

5/1—6/30 and 10/1—11/15



Consultation with NMFS

NMFS

(See 8/2/96 Section 7 letter)



Cape Cod Bay between
2/ 1—5/15

Consultation with NMFS

NMFS

(See 8/2/96 Section 7 letter)




Massachusetts/Rhode Island Dispersant Pre-Authorization Policy

Special Consideration Areas for Dispersant Approval

prepared by NOAA/Hazardous Materials Response & Assessment Division Scientific Support Coordination Branch

USE ONLY AS A GENERAL REFERENCE

2 Mile Boundary: Requ

Special Consideration


  1. Concurrence with NOA

  2. Concurrence with Stellw



Dispersant Monitoring Protocol


* To Be Developed *
(Interim protocol attached)

DISPERSANT MONITORING PROTOCOL

REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM III

(This protocol accepted by RRT I on 12/8/1993 as


the minimal interim dispersant monitoring protocol)

OBJECTIVES:

The Regional Response Team (RRT) has developed this protocol to monitor the deployment of chemical dispersant during oil spill response actions in marine and estuarine waters. The monitoring protocol is designed to assess movement of dispersed oil from the water surface into the water column and bottom sediments, and to provide data for analysis of potential biological effects.

Adoption of this protocol does not constitute a decision to use dispersant. Such decisions are the result of separate RRT agreements (pre-approval) or incident specific discussions.

This protocol eliminates the need to develop incident specific monitoring requirements during an ongoing spill and in addition to satisfying the stated objectives, is intended to expedite chemical dispersant response actions.



BACKGROUND:

The RRT has developed the following monitoring protocol to

enable rapid response to oil spills. Eliminating the need to

develop incident specific monitoring requirements and providing the On Scene Coordinators (OSC's) with the information necessary to plan for dispersant use should expedite responses.

OSC's must always be prepared to respond to an oil spill
with all available equipment, personnel and technology to reduce

the impact from accidents. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990

provides for the formation of Area Committees that shall, under the direction of the federal On Scene Coordinator, enhance State and local oil contingency planning by developing appropriate

procedures ' for use of dispersants. Dispersant technology ha


been recognized as a potential method of reducing the impact to

the shoreline environment from accidental oil spills. In order

to effectively utilize this technology, a protocol must be in place before a spill to identify the requirements for monitoring the dispersant application.

This dispersant monitoring protocol will:



  1. Provide scientific background information regarding the spill, dispersant utilization and effects. This will provide

natural resource trustees with information crucial to their

impact trade-off decisions. The data gained will assist with


subsequent damage assessment responsibilities.

Provide the OSC with the requirements of a monitoring program so that advance planning and coordination may occur. Thedata will also assist officials with support regarding post incident challenges 

3. Establish an education program for future learning regarding dispersant application. This will assist in reviewing dispersants as a permanent response tool.

The RRT established the requirement to monitor all dispersant applications. The requirement is not to delay the

effective application of the product but will enhance the

scientific and educational values for the future. This protocol


is presently established to gain knowledge in dispersant usage

and will require review and updating as better information and

data are gathered. As most oils must be dispersed within an

approximate 48 hour period, rapid response is a necessity. Rapid

response can not be insured unless a monitoring protocol is in

place which accurately assesses movement of dispersed oil and

potential biological effects. This monitoring protocol does not establish limits by which dispersant are applied or not applied, but identifies samples to be collected for laboratory scientific analysis.

The monitoring protocol established here will be impacted by incident specific variables. Spill size, spill dimensions,

weather, direction of trajectory and depth of water all provide

variables to the planned monitoring. Incident specific

directions will be required from the OSC, in consultation with

state and federal agencies, regarding monitoring. The plan


should be initiated promptly whenever the OSC authorizes the use

of dispersants on an oil spill. Implementation of the plan shall

not interfere with the spill cleanup. Should unforeseen
circumstances make it not possible to implement this monitoring

plan in whole or in part during or subsequent to authorized

dispersant application, the OSC shall advise the incident
specific RRT as soon as possible.

Equipment required for monitoring:

The following equipment will be necessary to conduct the

monitoring protocol. The equipment listed will only provide one

monitoring platform. In the instance of larger spills where

extensive monitoring is required, the OSC may need to consider

additional platforms. It is not envisioned in this program that

each and every dispersant application pass is individually
monitored. For planning purposes, it takes 1.5 hours to perform

the six point sampling protocol. Collection of sediment grab

samples and benthic invertebrate samples will take additional
time but are not time sensitive.

a. Aircraft for air surveillance of the dispersant

application and for initial guidance and direction of vessels

conducting the monitoring program. There are no specifics on the type of aircraft. Rotary or fixed wing aircraft are suitable for the job. The aircraft used must be able to communicate with

vessels in the area. Portable radios are often sufficient to
meet this requirement.


  1. A boat large enough to conduct required sampling. Large vessels with on board scientific equipment may be employed

however are not required. Immediate analysis of the water

samples is not a requirement. Boats approximately 23' in length,

radar and electronic navigation system equipped, provide

sufficient capacity. Any work from boats should take into

account the existing and predicted weather conditions and

location when determining a suitable platform. Often times


offshore spills have several large vessels attending much smaller

vessels conducting actual work. Vessels are likely to require


aircraft to lead them to the dispersant application site.

  1. A flourometer with the appropriate filter and capability to take samples at 1, 3 and 10 meters depth. The supply line should be fitted with a valve at the unit so that immediate water samples can be drawn with positive fluorescent readings.

  2. Water sample bottles, one liter, teflon lined screw caps

and amber in color. A minimum Of 120 bottles should be readily
available.

  1. Ice chest with ice for keeping samples cool during
    transit to laboratory.

  1. 35mm camera with film

  2. Video camera with one cassette

h. Radios for various monitoring platforms. One radio per platform should be sufficient.

i,. Drift buoy for estimating the dispersed oil plume

movement. This buoy should be equipped to allow tracking by the

monitoring vessel ,with a radar reflector. The six point

monitoring protocol requires sampling in relative positions to the deployed buoy. Should long term sampling of the same plume be desired a radio beacon buoy will be required.


  1. Supply of Hydrochloric acid (HCL) for sample
    preservation.

  1. Safety equipment should be carefully reviewed. Initial

oil spills will possibly contain levels of benzene, however by
the time the dispersant program and this monitoring program are

in place exposure should not be a problem. Consultation with

appropriate safety personnel should solve this problem. All
sampling should be done wearing PFD work vests, neoprene or latex

gloves, steel toed shoes and eye protection. Monitors using

aircraft and vessels should conform to established safety

procedures of the craft. Due to the cooler climates and cold


water in the northeast corridor, mustang suits or dry suits may

be appropriate. In the case of products which contain higher


amounts of Benzene, initial air monitoring may be required.

1. A 20 liter sample container for the collection of clean sea water at location number 1.

This monitoring program is designed to require a minimum of

scientific personnel offshore and to conduct the analysis in a


shoreside laboratory. Personnel going offshore should be able to

navigate accurately, utilize the flourometer correctly and take


proper water and sediment samples. Scientific personnel will be

required Nearshore and Inland Zones when conducting benthic invertebrate sampling. Other sampling may be desired for scientific purposes, but are not part of the required monitoring program.



ESTABLISHMENT OF DISPERSANT MONITORING ZONES:

The monitoring program is divided into three geographic zones including Offshore, Nearshore and Inland. The Offshore

Zone is considered all waters 3 nautical miles and greater from

the shoreline. This is essentially all waters beyond the state


water dividing line. The Nearshore Zone is considered all waters

from three miles to the shoreline essentially the same as is


presently considered state waters. The Inland Zone is all waters

within the headlands including bays, estuaries, rivers and


harbors.

DISPERSANT MONITORING TECHNIQUES

Visual observation (either aerial or by vessel) of the


dispersant application shall be conducted during dispersant use.

This observation will determine if the application is on target,

whether initial dispersing is occurring and identify any

shortfalls. The visual observation should be immediately after

application. Most often the use of aircraft is the most

practical due to height of eye. Vessels used for this purpose


would have to provide a considerable height to allow appropriate

observation. Timing of the aircraft is important to insure

sufficient airtime is available for both the observation and direction of boats for the monitoring program. Use of both still and video cameras is necessary to document the application and its results. Video film should be immediately taken back to the OSC and other officials for review. The OSC may use the film as

a basis for further decisions regarding dispersant application.

The OSC shall assign one of his staff and a federal

representative in offshore areas and a state representative in

nearshore and inland areas at a minimum for observation. Each

individual ' should be trained or posses experience in aeria


observation of spilled oil. Very limited space will be available

in aircraft and documentation using the video will allow others


in the command center to observe the application.

Field expedient tube testing may supplement or augment the immediate visual observation to determine the dispersibility of the oil. Using the test protocol established in enclosure (1), OSC's may approve use. The tube test will use a sample of the spilled oil and the dispersant to be applied.

This procedure establishes a 6 point sample collection protocol. The 6 point program will be utilized right after dispersant application and continue as deemed necessary by the

OSC. Enclosure (2) shows the layout to be used in collecting

samples using the 6 point collection pattern. At each monitor
point data will be gathered at 1 meter, 3 meter and at 10 meter

depths. Additionally, a 20 liter clean water sample will be


taken at position number 1 for analysis purposes. Information to

be gathered includes a position, fluorometer reading and water


samples at maximum meter deflection. Water samples are collected

for further scientific analysis. Flourometers must be properly

calibrated using the manufacturers instructions. Water samples
should be collected in the one liter bottles and kept cool using

the ice chest until analysis is completed. Flexibility in


implementing this protocol will be required due to the restricted

ability and safety of on scene personnel. In certain areas freezing of the water may occur and protection of the sample jars may be necessary.

Flourometers will be utilized to observe and measure

emulsified and dissolved oil in the water column. It will

provide a baseline using surrounding water as the normal

background. Flourometers and ancillary equipment should be


designed and calibrated for working with oils.

Sediment grab samples, when required, will be taken and

placed in 1 liter clean sample jars. The samples will be kept

cool until analysis can take place. Enclosure 3 outlines the

procedures for sediment sampling.

Benthic invertebrate sampling, when required, will be

conducted with personnel suitably qualified and using sample

containers that are clean and oil free. All means necessary to eliminate contamination by other than spilled oil must be taken. Enclosure 4 outlines the procedures for benthic sampling.

NOTE: Caution should be utilized in gathering sediment and

benthic invertebrate samples to avoid cross contamination with

oil in the water. Sediment or benthic invertebrate samples will

normally be taken after floating and dispersed oil passes the

collection points Oil from the spill impacting sediments and

invertebrates will remain for extended periods and rapid

collection is not necessary. It is expected that this sampling

will be conducted within weeks of the actual dispersant


application.

REQUIRED MONITORING
OFFSHORE:

  1. Visual monitoring initially and after every load of
    dispersant taken offshore.

  1. Video tape of the initial results of application

(3) Flourometer readings and water sampling using the 6 point protocol. Continued monitoring or the extent of monitoring will be determined by the spill size and the amount of dispersant to be applied.

Quantitative monitoring offshore is less than nearshore or inland due to the greater water depth, larger mixing zone and generally fewer sensitive resources in the area of impact.

NEARSHORE:


  1. Visual monitoring initially and after every
    application.

  1. Video tape and stills for the initial results of
    application.

  1. Flourometer readings and water sampling using the 6 point protocol. Continued monitoring or the extent of monitoring will be determined by the spill size, amount of dispersant to be applied, location of the spill and trajectory of the spill. The OSC should develop these in consultation with federal and state representatives. Continued monitoring at 6 hour intervals would allow sufficient information gathering to perform the required

analysis. Due to the possibility of encountering shallow water

impacting the 3 and 10 meter water samples, the program should


continue by taking water column samples at maximum water depth.

  1. Sediment grab samples should be taken in non oiled and oiled or potentially oiled water areas for comparative analysis. The only samples required are those to give a representative

indication of sediment impact from the dispersed oil. Beach

sampling of oiled beaches is not part of this program. When

flourometer readings are high in near bottom waters, sediment
sampling is not necessary due to known impact.

(5) Benthic invertebrate sampling should occur in non oiled and oiled or potentially oiled water areas for comparative

analysis. The only samples required are those to give a

representative indication of benthic invertebrate contamination


from the dispersed oil.

INLAND:


  1. Visual monitoring continually during application and
    until the expected trajectory reaches the shoreline.

  1. Video tape and stills of the oil being dispersed and
    results of the initial dispersal.

  1. Flourometer readings and water sampling using the 6 point protocol. Continued monitoring or the extent of monitoring will be determined by the spill size, amount of dispersant to be applied, resources at risk, location of the spill and trajectory of the spill. The OSC should develop these in consultation with federal, state and local representatives specifically for the area to be governed. Continued monitoring at 4 hour intervals or until the dispersed oil trajectory reaches the shore would allow sufficient information gathering to perform the required

analysis. Due to the possibility of encountering shallow water

impacting the 3 and 10 meter water samples, the program should


continue by taking samples at maximum water depth.

  1. Sediment grab samples should be taken in non oiled and oiled or potentially oiled water areas for comparative analysis. The only samples required are those to give a representative

indication of sediment impact from the dispersed oil. Beach
sampling of oiled beaches is not part of this program.

(5) Benthic invertebrate sampling should occur in non oiled and oiled or potentially oiled water areas for comparative

analysis. The only samples required are those to give a representative indication of benthic invertebrate contamination from the dispersed oil.

SAMPLE CUSTODY

All samples collected will be handled in accordance with U. S.


Coast Guard, Marine Safety Laboratories, Oil Spill Sample

Handling and Transmittal Guide, second edition, dated 15 Nov

1988, enclosure 5. This will allow for proper handling, storage,
chain of custody and marking of sample containers.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Laboratory analysis procedures for water samples should follow EPA Method 418.1 (Spectrophotometric, Infared), PETROLEUM

HYDROCARBONS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE, Storet No. 45501, enclosure 6.

Laboratory analysis procedures for sediment and benthic invertebrate samples should follow EPA Method 9071, OIL AND


GREASE EXTRACTION METHOD FOR SLUDGE SAMPLES, enclosure 7. These

procedures should be utilized unless otherwise stipulated or


requested by the OSC.

FUNDING

Funding dispersant application and monitoring should remain with the responsible party. This monitoring program is provided to OSC's and Area Committees for their use in reviewing the adequacy

of facility or vessel response plans and for potentially

responsible parties in determining the needs should dispersant application be determined feasible. These plans should indicate funding source for application and monitoring. In the absence of a responsible party, the OSC needs to be prepared to take action necessary and may plan on using this protocol.



REPORTS

Reports are required during the dispersant application and


monitoring program. The OSC's command center should be the focal

point for reporting. Close coordination is necessary to insure


all activities and constituents are kept abreast of activities

and the decisions required. The OSC's representative on scene at

the application site should provide immediate verbal feedback

regarding the application and results. The observer "should

maintain a logbook and document each action taken by the

dispersant contractor and the monitoring platform. The OSC


observer aboard the monitoring platform should provide operations

normal reports hourly and provide updates regarding monitoring

status. The OSC Command Center should maintain all reports
regarding the monitoring program and its results. A copy of all

data should be forwarded to the OSC, with copies to other

agencies, within 24 hours. Problems or difficulties should be

immediately reported to the command center. Long term monitoring

programs should develop a reporting procedure suitable for the
specific incident.

A written report is required regarding dispersant application within 45 days of the application. Copies of the draft report should be provided to the OSC prior to issuance of the final report. Using all the information gathered during the program, the report should review the information and develop specifics regarding dispersant application, it's impact and a cost benefit analysis. Responsible parties should be prepared to compile the report for submission to the OSC, with copies to other agencies and the National Response Team. All technical data and analysis information should be included with the report.



PROGRAM REVIEW

This plan should be reviewed based on exercises and actual field applications of dispersants. Suggested revisions should be prepared by or submitted to the Regional Response Team Three, Chemical Countermeasures Subcommittee for future incorporation into the plan.



Enclosures (1) FIELD DISPERSANT EFFECTIVENESS TEST

  1. SIX POINT DISPERSANT WATER MONITORING PROTOCOL

  2. EPA SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROCEDURE NUMBER 2016

  3. EPA BENTHIC SAMPLING PROCEDURE NUMBER 2032

  4. OIL SPILL HANDLING AND TRANSMITTAL GUIDE, USCG

  5. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE, Method 418.1 (Spectrophotometric, Infared)

  6. OIL AND GREASE EXTRACTION METHOD FOR SLUDGE SAMPLES, Method 9071, dated September 1988

Direction or Plume travel. (May differ from Spilled Oil Travel



SIX POINT DISPERSANT MONITORING
PROTOCOL
Sample 1 is uncontaminated control Sample 2-6 are representative samples of oil in the water column

On scene sea and weather conditions may require the use of drogue to follow plume direction of travel.



REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM III Z4 FEBRUARY, 1994




WILLIAM F. WELD

GOVERNOR

ARGO PAUL CEUUCCI



LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

TRUDY COXE



SECRETARY

December 8, 1995

Commander (m)

First Coast Guard District 408 Atlantic Ave.

Boston, MA 02110-3350

Dear Captain Williams:

This letter constitutes my approval of the Dispersant Pre-Authorization Policy dated August 14, 1995 presented by the Regional Response Team for acceptance by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. At my direction, Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management reviewed the policy to ascertain its consistency with state policies. That review has been completed with a favorable finding.

Your staff, the members of the Area Committee and the Regional Response Team who worked long and hard to develop the policy are to be commended. It represents a major step forward in the region's emergency response capability. The policy makes a valuable tool available to responders while setting acceptable limits to insure its responsible use. I truly hope we never have to use it!

I look forward to our staffs working cooperatively to develop a meaningful Monitoring Protocol as quickly as possible to complement the Dispersant Pre-authorization Policy in the unfortunate event it becomes necessary to resort to its use.

Cordially,



cc Capt. D. McGuire, USCG, FOSC, MSO Boston Capt. B. Turlo, USCG, FOSC, MSO Providence Peg Brady, Director, MCZM

Mr. Robert Donovan, MA DEP

Mr. David Struhs, Commissioner, DEP



Mr. Edward Conley, EPA Co-Chair, RRT Dr. Ken Finkelstein, NOAA Trustee, RRT Mr. Andrew Raddant, DOI Trustee, RRT

August 14, 1995


Yüklə 130,75 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə