Rania alammar 5- the Treatment



Yüklə 116,15 Kb.
tarix29.09.2018
ölçüsü116,15 Kb.
#71117








DIANA

THE ABDUCITON


1985-diana29.jpg

RANIA ALAMMAR

5- The Treatment:

First we recall what was written by the author in (2) p 402 that Paget report has depended, in the medical condition of the Princess at the scene and in the ambulance, only on the words of two doctors, Martino and Derossi, as for all the rest of the witnesses they have not been questioned. And that the French investigation, which Paget report said it originally did not interview all of the witnesses on the medical condition of the Princess, Paget in its turn depended on it. As well as in the hospital, Paget report did not directly interview Bruno Riuo and Alain Pavie who were responsible for the operation, also did not ask anyone for what has happened from the hospital nor available is any testimony from other witnesses at all.

Does not this mean they did not do anything to discuss the fact of the medical condition upon the arrival of the patient at all? Does not this mean that everything presented to us since that night is depended on very few people whom are never trustworthy?

In (2) p 400, here there is what confirms my belief she was not in a fatal condition as they say. The cardiologist Dr. Alain Pavie did not arrive to the hospital only after near half an hour of the arrival of the ambulance. The writer says that this is a sign that the hospital is not medically qualified, which is inevitably a sign of the scheme of the intelligence to kill the Princess, for if Martino was truthful that she had a cardiac arrest at 12:48, there should have been a cardiologist as the first of the recipients of the Princess.

My comment here is that this is not negligence as the writer and those who believe in murder think. I mean negligence is not here the cause of death, but what seems to be negligence is in fact in line with the thoughtful scheme, yet acting accordingly to the unfolding events and the medical status of the Princess. And what seems to be the case of a delayed doctor does not make us forget that the timing of the receipt of the patient to the hospital in fact has some confusion in the documentation, as we mentioned before, at the very least.

In (2) p 403, the medical expert of Paget report Dr. Richard Shepherd said as he knew from records from the hospital and doctors remarks, in his opinion that the method of treatment that has been done was logical. The question is why Paget report distorts his words and says the expert said that the case of the Princess is impossible to survive?

Why insisting on lying that her condition was deadly, while the operation was on the right track as described by Dr. John Ochsner? Whom I quoted in my film (The Queen) stating that simply suturing the wound with a massage of the heart and the result is not the death of the patient. Here Dr. Shepherd did not originally say that the situation was fatal. It means surviving the operation is very much the possible, but Paget report had put words on his tongue and they wrote it was a fatal condition.

Description of treatment:

In (3) p 382-384, Dominique Hagnere said here that she arrived unconscious and was injected due to internal bleeding with much of the same blood, as well as 150 blood bottles( 5mm 1 per 5mm 1g ) and the amount is too much.

In (3) p 392, as well as the Princess was injected with all the Adrenaline in the hospital. Is this normal procedure? Especially in light of the words of the surgeon Alain Pavie at p. 390 that there was not an analysis to determine her blood group and nothing was left of her blood, so she was given category of o- , which is acceptable by anyone. This talk is inconsistent with the document at p. 361, which prove that Dr. Riuo requested blood and medicines before even the time of the incident. This issue will be clearer in the following pages.

In (4) p 522-523, Bruno Riou said that when Diana first got to the hospital was alive, unconscious and receiving mechanical ventilation and was in a state of shock. Then there is the description of the first steps of the treatment, including doses of Noradrenalin which its effect is stronger than Dopamine. This was done after taking an X-ray of the chest that showed internal bleeding. And then blood was transferred to her, and then after being sure of the internal bleeding she was given more Noradrenalin.

My comment is that Noradrenalin like Dopamine raises the blood pressure, but it is bad if there is internal bleeding caused by injury because it will make more blood out of the vein. Has Bruno Riou and those with him acted as a result of a medical error or deliberate action to increase the chance of death or no, but because the bleeding was not serious as they say? But rather the low pressure is really because of the intubation and anesthesia because these procedures cause a drop in the pressure as well. And her being not conscious when entering the hospital does not confirm that this is because of the bleeding, which she originally remained conscious after it, but it is because of the drugs.

Why did not they know of her blood type? This protest was made against the hospital. This makes the reader think that this contributed to the death, but the reality is that there was already a blood transfusion with o- to her despite the lack of knowledge of her blood category.

I think if there was intention to kill, there would not be a quick blood transfusion. They could have excused themselves for not knowing the blood type and would fell behind in the blood transfusion procedure, but rather they did the right and necessary thing to do. In other documents from Morgan's books we will see that they were keen to provide all the necessary blood and its medicines even before the occurrence of the incident, which I consider an evidence of rescuing her after a scheme of virtual attempting to kill.

In (4) p 524, the writer mentions other remedial steps after the claimed cardiac arrest in the hospital, including that Bruno Riou has performed a medical massage on the chest.

My comment is that because of their knowledge of the presence of an internal bleeding at this stage, then how come Riou performed a medical massage on the chest? It is as if breaking her chest here rather than treating her. Is this an act of ignorance from Riou or lying or no .. the internal bleeding was not really very dangerous as described and this heart attack as we have said is questionable. Also due to the absence of proper medical documentation as we will see in the following pages. However the author says the following:

In (4) p 524-525, the writer says that Diana died directly of this cardiac arrest when she reached the hospital, before the recorded death nearly an hour and 43 minutes and before the open chest operation carried out by Dr. Moncef Dahman at 2:12. The author says that if her heart has beaten again they would have said it.

It is strange to me that the writer shows a type of appreciation and ratification for the doctors who supervised the operation, especially Bruno Riou who the writer himself proved his lies in other pages. Why believe him on the issue of cardiac arrest and the reality of death as a whole, which was announced by him?

External wounds:

In (3) p 376, Dr. Bruno Riou said that the wounds of the Princess were so severe and evident. This description contradicts all certificates contained in the books that her external condition was considered good and she had no wounds except a small wound that was on her forehead.

In (3) p 382, Dominique Hagener, the nurse at the hospital and the only person who said that the ambulance arrived at 1:30, said that the Princess was not in a serious condition and she was not presenting any external injuries. This is the opposite of the words of Dr. Riou in the previous lines.

Comment:


First, in addition to the doubts about the reality of this second cardiac arrest I ask why they would say and confess that her heart regained its beats? Who were these people around her? Were they trustworthy or not? And we do not forget that Dr. Bruno Riou is at the very least a person who was weakened under the pressure, and he is the one who had issued a document of death that contains a legal impediment related to the corpse, and he did not back down only after the advent of Dr. Dominique Lecomte to give her opinion that there is no obstacle. I will detail this in the following pages.

Also, there is a contradiction in the official time of the death, where Bruno Riou announced that it occurred at 4:00, while from the book (Diana, Death of a Goddess) Riou himself told the police official Philip Massoni and the French Interior Minister that she died at 3:30. This in addition to his lies about the hospital as the right place to receive celebrities, and his lies in the description of the wounds as stated before.

If he is innocent, why contributes to the deceptions unless he was afraid of something? How the writer suddenly trusted him? Especially in the light of the continued hiding of the facts after the alleged death in each detail, reaching the issue of blood samples, which will be mentioned in subsequent pages.

On top of all this, if there was only the intention of killing, why they continued to attempt her recovery after a long time since the accident? Did not they try to revive her, which really negates the intention of killing? What is the evidence that she was not recovered except here the sudden writer's ratification to their opinion? If they all said that the evidence is seeing her dead, what is the guarantee that Diana was not only drugged in front of those who saw her after the operation?

And isn't choosing La Pitie Salpetriere by high authorities including the Elysee Palace and Buckingham Palace is suspicious after they denied that they chosen the hospital? To indicate that who chose the hospital was only one of the staff at the ambulance station? Why the two Palaces, Elysee and Buckingham, fear to say they chose the hospital? Isn't this raises the question about the hospital and the role of the doctors in it?

In (4) p 526, it is clear that the writer blames everyone before and after the alleged death, except the doctors who performed the surgery at the hospital. This seems illogical to me. And he believes that her condition worsened after reaching the hospital. What I see is that she was saved by the hospital, but the rapid believing of the novel of a cardiac arrest upon arrival, is only a result of the prior suggestions in all the previous exaggerations concerning her condition.



TO BE CONTINUED

22-7-2015

thequeendiana97@gmail.com

Please watch the film I made in 2014 here:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFZu_PbOiL0
Yüklə 116,15 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə