Colin Martin and David Sutton
Survey of barium enema doses Survey of barium enema doses Review of dose data Factors contributing to higher doses Optimising of technique Coronary Angiography Possible use of screening time for DRLs
The range in doses from fluoroscopy procedures is much larger than for radiography The range in doses from fluoroscopy procedures is much larger than for radiography Influenced by: Equipment Operator technique Patient factors
Collection of KAP data for recent survey from one hospital Distribution for 120 patient barium enema exams
Extent and severity of disease Extent and severity of disease Condition of patient Patient size It is helpful to record patient weight, as this has a substantial influence on patient dose
Collect data for 20-30 patients at least Collect data for 20-30 patients at least The spread of data is greater for fluoroscopic procedures, Depends on: Patient’s condition as well as size 0perator skill and technique
Completion of paper forms by operators Advantage - details such as patient weight can be included more readily Disadvantage - limited number of patients Use data from computer database Advantage – information for large numbers of patients Disadvantage – Accuracy of data entry
Collect data for 20-30 patients at least Collect data for 20-30 patients at least If possible choose patients with mean weight of 70 kg Pick patients between 50 kg – 90 kg Exclude other data, consider validity of outliers – wrong units, unusually heavy patient if no weight data Calculate mean KAP value
All radiologists and All radiologists and radiographers have their Some take more images, others use more fluoroscopy Radiologists’ practices have evolved from approaches when they were trained Techniques have been modified in different ways in order to take account of changes in recommendations
Only screen for short periods Only screen for short periods Keep the image receptor close to the patient Keep the x-ray tube at maximal distance from patient Use higher kVp / lower dose options where possible
Collect data for mean results for a representative collection of hospitals Collect data for mean results for a representative collection of hospitals Ideally all major hospitals If not all, then a representative sample which might be 20-30 hospitals in a country
Calculate use rounded 3rd Quartile value for DRL Calculate use rounded 3rd Quartile value for DRL
DRL can then be used for comparisons by individual hospitals DRL can then be used for comparisons by individual hospitals Data collection Analyse, review and investigate
Investigation of intestinal tract Investigation of intestinal tract Involves imaging intestine following barium contrast through Additional images are recorded to visualise large intestine with higher quality
Pair of images, each showing the whole of the large intestine Pair of images, each showing the whole of the large intestine Taken with patient lying first on one side and then on the other Usually one AP and one PA
Mean KAP Mean KAP 15.4 Gy cm2 KAP Range 4.4 – 30.4 Gy cm2
Investigation if mean value exceeds DRL Investigation if mean value exceeds DRL Highlights problems with equipment or technique (or training) Aids Optimisation
Equipment Equipment Dose performance Method of image recording Operator / procedure factors Screening or fluoroscopy time No. of images recorded Operators in training may give higher doses
Barium Enemas Barium Enemas Factor Median Quartiles Range Screening time 1.9 1.7-2.6 1.1-4.0 Pulse fluoro rates 1-7.5 p/s Total no. of images 12.2 10.5-14.1 4.1-23.3 Radiographs with second tube 2.1 2.0-3.0 0-5.3
Mean Fluoro KAP Mean Fluoro KAP 10.1 Gy cm2
Combination of: Combination of: Moving to lower dose rate option? Choosing low dose mA v kV options? Reducing fluoroscopy time?
Mean Total KAP Mean Total KAP 25.4 Gy cm2 KAP Range 4.4 – 30.4 Gy cm2
Use of faster film / screen system? Use of faster film / screen system? Use of alternative imaging technique?
Hospitals used either 400 speed film/screen or CR Hospitals used either 400 speed film/screen or CR No link between CR and higher or lower doses No relationship to kV Two hospitals used C-arm units and recorded images with image intensifier C-arm systems were two of those with lower doses C-arm examinations quicker as the patient does not have
Digital equipment with low dose digital fluorography imaging Digital equipment with low dose digital fluorography imaging Incorporation of copper filters which reduce dose
Age of equipment Age of equipment Performance of image intensifier
Complex procedures with high doses Complex procedures with high doses Wide variation in complexity of procedures Other aspects are life threatening / life saving Radiation doses are high Skill and training of the operator is of overriding importance
Angiograms may include a variety of additional procedures on varying numbers of vessels – Typical descriptors Angiograms may include a variety of additional procedures on varying numbers of vessels – Typical descriptors Angiogram - Coronary Angiogram - Coronary & left ventriculogram Angiogram - Coronary & PTCA Angiogram – Coronary & stent Angiogram - Coronary & graft Angiogram - Coronary & PTCA & stent Angiogram - Radial Coronary Radio Frequency Abalation
Doses will depend on complexity of procedure and number of vessels investigated numbers of vessels Doses will depend on complexity of procedure and number of vessels investigated numbers of vessels
Review Means Review Means Calculate 3rd Quartile
Many other factors involved. Many other factors involved. Equipment – dose rates / options Numbers of images recorded
Collect 20 – 30 patient doses for each procedure Collect 20 – 30 patient doses for each procedure Restrict weight range if possible DRL set based on 3rd Quartile Comparison with DRL Many equipment and technique factors could be involved in higher doses
Dostları ilə paylaş: |