Snorri Sturluson as a historian of religions: The credibility of the descriptions of pre-Christian cultic leadership and rituals in Hákonar saga góða Abstract



Yüklə 209,35 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə1/10
tarix15.07.2018
ölçüsü209,35 Kb.
#55656
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10


Olof Sundqvist

Snorri Sturluson as a historian of religions: 

The credibility of the descriptions of 

pre-Christian cultic leadership and rituals 

in Hákonar saga góða

Abstract: This study investigates the credibility of the descriptions of pre-Christian 

cultic leadership and rituals in Snorri Sturluson’s Hákonar saga góða. The perspective 

is one taken from the study of the history of religions. By using a comparative method, 

one which combines source criticism and philology, ancient ideas may be detected 

even within Snorri’s reconstruction. Scholars have interpreted these ideas by setting 

them in a wider source context. Here it is argued that several ideas in Snorri’s descrip-

tion in Hákonar saga góða may be attested in sources which are closer to the Viking 

Age, such as Skaldic poetry, runic inscriptions and archaeological finds. For instance, 

the idea that political leaders such as kings and earls were involved in public cults 

may be one based on ancient traditions. Snorri, too, was probably on firm ground 

when he stated that the rulers (at least the king) were supposed to take part in certain 

rituals while attending sacrificial feasts: rituals such as drinking ceremonies and 

meal customs perhaps such as the eating of horseflesh. That these ceremonies some-

times took place in some kind of cultic building or banqueting hall, such as described 

by Snorri, seems also likely. It is emphasized, however, that some elements in his text 

must be seen as suspect, as Olaf Olsen, Ernst Walter and Klaus Düwel have noted. 

These elements include certain religious terms, as well as the act of making the sign 

of the hammer over the horn. Generally, however, it is argued that Hákonar saga góða, 

if treated with care, may still be used as a source for pre-Christian religion.

The mythical and historical writings of Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) have been 

debated in research for more than one hundred years. Snorri’s texts have sometimes 

been felt to be almost useless when reconstructing ancient Scandinavian religion 

and Viking Age history.¹ This type of source-critical approach has deep roots in the 

study of Old Norse philology and religion as well as in the general study of histo-

ry.² One prominent representative for this skeptical position was the German scholar 

Walter Baetke. Some of his ideas have been instrumental in establishing the modern 

treatment of Snorri’s texts. Baetke argued, for instance, that Snorri revised the old 

mythical traditions in accordance with learned medieval models and his own imagi-



1 See e.g. Olsen 1966; Düwel 1985.

2 See e.g. Bugge 1881–89; Mogk 1923 and 1932; L. Weibull 1948; C. Weibull 1964.

Brought to you by | Stockholms Universitet

Authenticated | 10.248.254.158

Download Date | 9/18/14 2:50 PM




72

 Olof Sundqvist



nation. For example, Snorri frequently used medieval euhemerism when describing 

ancient myths. This method was a common feature of ecclesiastic apologetics, where 

the pagan deities were considered as ancient human rulers and thus not ‘real gods’. 

Because of this approach and other rewritings of the traditions, Baetke considered 

Snorri’s descriptions of myth to be unreliable when reconstructing pagan religion.³ 

A similar stand was also taken by the Norwegian philologist Anne Holtsmark.⁴ This 

critical attitude against Snorri is also reflected in more recent research concerning his 

historical writing in Heimskringla. It has been stated that Snorri was “not at all reluc-

tant to adapt his sources as he sees fit and even write whole new chapters of his own 

in order […] to clarify connections and make his narrative more alive”.⁵

Even if Snorri’s writings have not satisfied the stern criteria of source criticism, 

several scholars have felt they should not be completely discarded as sources of 

knowledge for Viking Age religion and culture.⁶ Some of them incorporate oral tradi-

tions which may reach back to the Viking Age. Some traditions have probably been 

reworked by Snorri and other medieval scribes, by means of medieval thinking and 

artistic enthusiasm. This reworking is no reason to dismiss them altogether. Snorri 

and the medieval writers probably had access to more direct sources than the modern 

historian has, and most likely they were better suited to interpret them when making 

their historical reconstructions.⁷

The present paper will investigate the credibility of the descriptions of pre-Chris-

tian cultic leadership and rituals in Snorri’s Hákonar saga góða. My perspective here 

is taken from the history of religions. By using a comparative method which com-

bines source criticism and philology, I will try to detect ancient notions in Snorri’s 

reconstruction. These notions can be interpreted by setting them in a wider context 

of sources. In these comparisons mostly direct sources will be applied, that is, skaldic 

poetry, runic inscriptions, and especially archaeological finds. When such compari-

son is not possible (due to scarcity of direct sources), the absence of similar ideas 

and customs in contemporary Christian culture is taken as support for the reliability 

of medieval statements on ancient Scandinavian tradition. Other independent (and 

3 Baetke 1950, 1951 and 1964.

4 Holtsmark 1964.

5 Jónas Kristjánsson 1988, p. 175. Cf. Vésteinn Ólason 1998, p. 59.

6 See e.g.  Dumézil 1948; Ström 1975; Meulengracht Sørensen 1991; Hultgård  1993; Dillmann 1997 

and 2008; Steinsland 2000 and 2005; Schjødt 2008; Hedeager 2011.



7 Preben Meulengracht Sørensen made the following observations when considering Snorri’s nar-

rative about Hákon the Good and sacrifices in Trøndelag: “History is not the data extracted from the 

sources, but the syntheses created out of the data, and historical writings are not the reestablishment 

of past reality, but the creation of historical probabilities. In this perspective the medieval narrative 

historiographic texts should be considered primary sources, since their authors had better access to 

authentic sources than the modern historian and were presumably better suited to interpret them” 

(Meulengracht Sørensen 1991, p. 244).

Brought to you by | Stockholms Universitet

Authenticated | 10.248.254.158

Download Date | 9/18/14 2:50 PM




Yüklə 209,35 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə