Some notes 9/22/11
-
Generally SVO – is this right?? //Cf. PJS comment: “나마어는 주어 목적어 동사를 주요 어순으로 하는데 어순은 좀 자유롭게 변화할 수 있습니다.”
-
Does the pragmatic status of nominals determine the order of constituents? (non-specific, indefinite first?)
-
To look out for: does order vary with respect to tense or definiteness of object?
-
Yend sènonjo [wèngem alet]
I now [go-1sg fut hunt]
‘I’m going hunting now’
-
Enjela, nansi, saman [alet fengèm]
Angela Nansi Saman [hunting go-pst]
‘Angela, Nansi, Saman went hunting’
// Btw, is ‘alet’ a V? Could it be a N?
-
Verb final in some imperative constructions?
-
Tane buk tenuman
My book bring-IMP
//Really? If so, this is very strange…
-
Head-final (with postpositions?)
-
Examples of postpositions?
-
Gimb təkem jamɛ təndon
Pig put(down it) mat, sign beside, side
//is this a postposition?
//distinguish between LOC Case markers and postpositions.
//if a language has case markers, the distinction between case markers and adpositions may be problematic.
-
GEN precedes head noun:
-
Táf Elisabet -ene ámbirosi sú ghèrarean
During Elizabeth-of ? pregnant months
-
What about Táf? Is this language also prepositional?
-
(Strong) evidence to verify head-finality: (look for the following: )
-
Does Relative Clause (RC) and Numeral precede N (e.g., "[[책상위에 있는] 연필]")?
-
Is Causative expressed by suffixation or by light verbs (e.g., Korean ‘-하다’)?
-
Is there a question particle? (So far, no)
-
Also, a suffixing language. No prefixation (so far) ~ no head-initiality
-
Weak evidence for wh in-situ; no strong evidence for wh-raising (YET...)
-
Especially, why (namamè) & how (namamèn) in-situ? //Check general WO – SVO or SOV?
-
Fa namamèn nekwu yam?
He why angry be-3sg pr
-
Fa namamèn euan yam?
He how happy be-3sg pr
-
Wh-phrases:
-
whose
|
who
|
what
|
which
|
Where
|
when
|
endene
|
Efe
|
nama
|
arkamunum
|
ande? / nai?
|
njam
|
how
|
how many
|
why
|
|
|
|
namamèn
|
yènam
|
namamè
|
|
|
|
-
Case markers:
-
-an
|
‘in’
|
LOC
|
akw-an ‘morning-in’
ndawan ‘garden-in’
|
-on
|
‘in’
|
LOC
|
mong-on ‘house-in’
|
-am
|
‘on’
|
LOC
|
kitarakitar-am ‘shelf-on’
|
-mun
|
‘from’
|
|
nai-mun ‘where(+wh)-from’
mata-mun ‘Mata-from’
|
-ot
|
‘to’
|
|
ndaw-ot ‘garden-to’
mong-ot ‘house-to’
yuw-ot ‘region-to
|
-am
|
|
SUBJ (Nom/Erg?)
|
amaf-am ‘mother(+subj)
mbermber-am ‘wind(+subj)
|
-ene
|
‘of’
|
GEN
|
Elisabet-ene ‘Elisabeth’s’
|
-efaf
|
‘to’ roughly
|
DAT?
|
yàràitamànt Josef-éfaf ‘engaged to Joseph’
|
-
Ergativity?
-
Verbal constructions I: Dative/double object construction
-
Ngánjánam yáfáretam enjol Gabril mèrèsoefaf Najareèt Galili yuw-ot.
God sent angel Gabriel to virgin
-
Verb conjugations
-
|
SINGULAR
|
PLURAL
|
|
1sg
|
2sg
|
3sg
|
1pl
|
2pl
|
3pl
|
PRESENT
|
-an
|
-e
|
-e
|
-am
|
-ati?
|
-at
|
PAST
|
-un
|
-am (5)
-eng (3)
|
-am(5)
-eng (3)
|
-um
|
|
-end
|
FUTURE
|
-g-
|
-g-
|
-g-
|
-g-
|
-g-
|
-g-
|
Identifying syncretisms in verbal morphology:
-
|
SINGULAR
|
PLURAL
|
|
1sg
|
2sg
|
3sg
|
1pl
|
2pl
|
3pl
|
PRESENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUTURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Observations concerning verbs:
-
2sg 3sg syncretism in the present tense (13/23 = 57%)
-
2sg 3sg syncretism in the past tense (12/23 = 52%)
-
2sg 3sg syncretism in the future tense (14/23 = 61%)
-
n-/k- alternation.
-
Does /k-/ prefix mark past?
-
Verbs seem to categorize into either ye- type or nu-/ne- type.
-
Is ye- some sort of object agreement? //I think so.
-
Nu-/ne- seems to be one-place predicates…verify.
-
–n for singular; -m for plural?
-
Analytic marking: yend, fa, fem morphemes before some plural verbs.
-
What is the w- morpheme?
-
Present Past:
-
n/k alternation
-
/k-/ prefix = PAST
-
/n/ = ELSEWHERE
-
n/k/t alternation
-
Future tense:
-
Dostları ilə paylaş: |