Space and time are nowadays part of Immanuel Kant's well-established

7^th Attempt

Content

Space and time are nowadays part of Immanuel Kant's well-established,

so-called limiting categories of ideas and thoughts. 2

The idea/theory of the most primordial memory is supported by the following beliefs. 4

The pure inner form and inner nature. 5

But space can´t be curved! 7

Space and time are in their purest internal phenomenological forms merely memory. 8

The background to an empirical survey of the most primordial memory. 9

Here's how the world should basically look like through the eyes as the

idea/theory of the most primordial memory give us an opportunity to look with. 10

DNA and cell biology (adapted from K. Meyl's current paper on the Web). 11

For example, our body related to the magnetic scalar waves. 12

According to Konstantin Meyl. 13

Notes 14

7^th Attempt

Space and time are nowadays part of Immanuel Kant's well-established, so-called limiting categories of ideas and thoughts¹. Sometimes Kant himself regarded these categories as more obscuring than clarifying². However, the exact details of this dark-process he never revealed. One can still say that regardless of exactly what was included in the current limitation, Kant's view of space and time had already been established earlier, and in that context, he stressed that the phenomena of space and time included the very condition of how we perceive, for example, the external physical phenomena. Among other things, he could show that both space and time consist of pure internal forms. They can therefore never be outside the language; beyond our consciousness. Space and time are with other words, only founded in the language that is of all internal nature. Kant could also from his purely phenomenological perspective use the logic that makes it possible to discover that space and time contain the very foundation of our ability to have a language at all.

From here he took the natural step to our consciousness or to the language's actual forum. It was in our ability for language that he simply placed the ground for our consciousness. Consciousness therefore has its foundation in the pure inner form and nature of the phenomena space and time. According to Kant, consciousness is also carried on in an equivalent manner, and since consciousness as well as space and time basically have these pure inner form and nature, they also lack all real existence in the outer physical world.

To continue this short presentation of Kant's two most centrally limiting categories of ideas and thoughts, now follows an attempt to clarify the idea/theory of the most primordial memory (referring to attempts three, five and six).

The idea/theory of the most primordial memory is based in exactly the same manner as our consciousness, namely in the common and pure internal form and nature of space and time, and this circumstance will be fully utilized

As this is about publishing a new idea/theory that contains new ways of looking at phenomena such as space, time, consciousness, language, inner and outer nature, the physical and mental world etc. is it reasonable to initially reveal some of the rooted beliefs for this new idea/theory formation. They can be compared to the beliefs that some authorities in the field previously postulated as self-evident truths and which then contributed to carrying out any current idea or theory - occur in almost all theories in modern physics.

The first of these beliefs; 1: Space and time are of pure inner nature and both have a pure inner form. This means that either space or time can exist outside our consciousness/language. Should they be isolated (beyond anything else), neither space nor time can be perceived by us with our senses or under the circumstances that normally apply to what we perceive as existing in the outer physical world. This is a belief, but it´s a belief in exactly the same way that the beliefs in modern physics are, and in this case, announces that both space and time are out there in the physical world (hence one is opposed to quite the opposite kind than this first; 1) and that they are defined by the physicists as belonging to the physical world by means of their measurements; for example a tape measure and a clock.

The second belief; 2: There exists a conceptual substitution phenomenon for time and it´s simply the memory/memories or nature's ability to remember. The most primordial memory can then be perceived as all memory structures, forms, figures, shapes, codes, images, etc. that occur in our nature as a whole.

The most primordial memory is equated with our consciousness, and is then linked to us people; our language/our consciousness; 3. What we for example make conscious in our minds personally have basically and in the past been in the most primordial memory - at an overall impersonal/neutral level.

When something becomes conscious to us, as e.g. a new knowledge of our nature, this occurs through the energy or power source in the most primordial memory which throughout its pure internal form replaces the traditional physical space; all volumes and spaces in the universe as a whole , and thereby reveals the fourth hinted belief; 4.

The idea/theory of the most primordial memory is supported by the following beliefs

1. Space and time are of pure inner nature and form, they can´t exist beyond our consciousness/our language.

2. Time as a phenomenon is replaced by all memory structures, figures, forms, codes, images, etc. that exist in our nature as a whole.
3. This the most primordial memory is equated with our consciousness. What we make conscious in our minds on a personal level have previously only been in the most primordial memory and there on an overall impersonal/neutral level.
4. The energy and power source that exists within the context of the intrinsic inheritance from the most primordial memory, appears as a sort of ancestress for all natural phenomena, and within that framework there is no traditional physical space at all.

  
  

From here, you should be able to proceed to any place at all in the justified introductory text and from there keep the presumably current text representative of the entire presentation as such, without thereby having to start the current textual continuation from any other and completely different and just as effective place.
This work, however, fulfills the policy that it all began with, namely, in Immanuel Kant's ideas and, above all, as these were expressed in his work, critique of pure reason³, and as in the philosophical history sometimes is referred to as the Copernican idea revolution. If you want to be extremely concise, you can undoubtedly claim: With this work, the revolution that once Immanuel Kant started, will now be completed. What is going to happen here is to try to pinpoint Kant's starting points for his Copernican revolutionary ideas, as well as the criticisms he directed against certain traditional ideas that occurred - and still do - especially about space, time and our consciousness.

We look at paragraph 4 above, and complete its inherent logic, by saying: Space and time are here in their original state: The pure inner form and inner nature.

Immanuel Kant could show and note that space and time never ever leave these original states: The pure inner form and nature. As such, they are nothing but in the most formatted form and nature of the Copernican idea revolution.

They occur in their pure inner living energy field. This pure inner running fills all traditional physical space, and it always lies first in the order*. It´s therefore this pure inner form and nature alludes to and underlies all external physical phenomena and all that for the rest happen in outer physical nature. In other words (in the pure inner form and nature), the traditional physical space does not exist at all.

It´s simply impossible to find a clean external platform from which we could consider/study the outer space and the outer time, when such an external platform is completely lacking. We are once and for all referred to the introspective way of looking at time and space. One can even dare to say that through our collective consciousness space and time are of this common pure inner form and nature, and that made Immanuel Kant very clear to us in the context of publishing his Copernic revolutionary ideas at the end of 1700s.

Thinkers/philosophers after Kant have of course tried to pass by him or develop their own ideas next to him. Common to most of them has been that they overlooked his idea revolution. Sometimes it also seemed as if those people pretended that it had not even taken place. This later applies, among others, to Edmund Husserl⁴ and Maurice Merleau-Ponty⁵. It´s remarkable given to their good reputation and that both are considered as the leading representatives of the current subject: phenomenology. Husserl is perceived today even as the founder of modern phenomenology.

A logician or mathematician of modern cut probably would not realize that the most primordial memory does not exist in any traditional spatial sense, if it were spoken in the way it was just done in this context. However, it´s important to emphasize that all traditional logic and mathematics rest on the basis of which all the material objects are considered to exist in the traditional spaces in which they own their respective extensions.
Now that the relationship is completely different or that the most primordial memory, has taken the place from traditional physical space so to speak should it be followed by that the logics (and mathematics) takes this into account.

* Before e.g. the Higgsboson, Paul Dirac´s antimatter, Konstantin Meyl´s magnetic scalar waves etc. in the current field area (the field in Maxwell´s view/opinion).

Still, in principle, all research, including modern physics, is based on the conclusions to what our contemporary logic and mathematics offer.
You can also express the matter like this: Logic and math of today rest on misleading grounds, and this permeates - both theoretically and empirically - in principle all modern research and science.
It´s sometimes said by cosmologists and others that the universe is spatially limited, for example that the universe is equipped with a so-called event horizon, outside it happens nothing. There is simply the border for the total space of our universe, and beyond that, according to the same advocates as above, either one or more other universes must exist and with their own space - or nothing at all. The whole idea with e.g. the current event horizon rests on the fact that we know for sure what space (any space at all) is in itself. What space is in itself, we know nothing about (according to Immanuel Kant's limiting categories; space).
Universe's total space consists of the most primordial memory and it meets all the traditional space, that is, the space that may be outside the universe's total space. Thereby, there are no other universes outside or beside our own that can influence the situation in our own. Space is in plain text throughout nonexistent, and what happen in nature can basically only be linked to the memory structures, forms, figures, codes, pictures, etc., which we perceive or discover through our consciousness as different expressions of outer physical and inner mental phenomena, which we traditionally mean is included in the physical cycle of events during the clock time. The talk that time in different ways has affects in nature is thus given a more correct and meaningful value, which is completely different from our tradition-bound images.

Space-time

Nikola Tesla (1856-1943)⁶ expressed himself critically to Einstein's theory of relativity⁷, which he called "a magnificent mathematical costume that fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a purple dressed beggar that the ignorant mistakes as a King. Its proponents are brilliant people, but they are metaphysics rather than scientists." ¹⁴ Tesla also believed that much of Einstein's theories of relativity had already been submitted by the Croatian philosopher and mathematician Roger Joseph Boscovic (1711-1787)⁸. Tesla has said in an unpublished interview from 1936: "the theory of relativity is by far much older than its present advocates. It was presented more than 200 years ago by my brilliant countryman RJ Boscovic, the great philosopher who wrote a few thousand bands of excellent literature in very different subjects. Boscovic's work dealt with relativity, including the so-called space-time. "His own view of the theory of relativity described Tesla with the following words:" I think space can´t be curved for the simple reason that it can´t have any properties. You would as well say that God has qualities. He has not, only characteristics, and these we have created ourselves.

Properties one can only deal with when matter fills space. To say that space is curved by the presence of large bodies is like claiming that something can be affected by nothing. I, and many with me, refuse to sign such an opinion ".

Tesla's view of space-time as above is similar to what you might have about the most primordial memory. The difference is, of course, that the most primordial memory does not contain any traditional space at all, and the physical time (clock time) is also disconnected here and can be transformed into a total memory for everything.

In this context, it can also be argued that the mathematics such as Einstein used to portray the phenomenon known as space-time is a pure inner phenomenon with pure inner forms. The internal (linguistic) characteristics of mathematics (inner form and inner nature) are, inter alia, exactly equivalent to space and time; if we follow the logic that Kant's limiting categories of ideas and thoughts supports. One can therefore look at this - about space time - in the sense that Einstein has drawn the correct conclusions purely phenomenologically with regard to the mathematics that carries out his theory of relativity and space-time, but in addition, the classical theory of relativity lacks a proper basic premise for space and time.

Among people in general, the idea of ​​the curved space (the curvature of the time in space to a so-called fourth dimension of space) flourishes.

But space can´t be curved!

At least not in the way that Einstein declared in his relativity thinking and above all not in the way he expressed it in his general theory of relativity.

For example, that the sun's light is curved (or folds off) when it passes e.g. the earth does not depend on the so-called space-time effect.

As said, space lacks the ability to curve because space at the basic level does not exist at all. Something that does not exist can´t have any characteristics. Space can´t basically have four dimensions or any more than that.

Time

Time exists in our nature as a physical substitution phenomenon for the phenomenon of memory or for all the current memory forms, figures, codes, structures, images, etc.

Equivalent metaphysical time speculations have been relevant earlier in philosophy history, a well-known case is Martin Heidegger⁹. His view of time as a purely internal phenomenon, however, was quite diffuse, yet he stretched out to say about the phenomenon time that it resembles a lot of our phenomenon of memory.

Here it´s about to replace the extraordinarily traditional, neutral and physical phenomena space and time with what these two phenomena actually mean.
Formulärets överkant

Space and time are in their purest internal phenomenological forms merely memory.

Of course, at the conceptual level can this be considered as a metaphysically speculation. To the point, this metaphysical speculation basically is of exactly the same kind as the metaphysical speculation such as, for example, Einstein used in his relativity theories; including space, time and space-time, and that used by Kant in his revolutionary Copernican ideas about space and time.

Both the current cases, Einstein's metaphysical speculation and Kant´s, gained fame when they found resonance among ordinary people. But the fact remains, regardless of reputation and possibly useful effects in practical terms, in either case, neither space nor time has any correct basic premise, which they received in the context of the most primordial memory. The most primordial memory is doubtless a metaphysical speculation as much as Einstein's and Kant's ditto. The difference is that in the most primordial memory nature is included as a whole in which all natural phenomena have a common origin.

An advantage of this is that the phenomena we express as inter alia the soul, spirit, metaphysics, transcendence, intuition and feelings like joy, hate, sorrow, fear, rage, shame, guilt, etc. take place on the same scene as the external physical phenomena, and can thus be treated as existing in one and the same world with one and the same basic premise.

On the surface, it may be perceived as a very short-term profit, for how in the name of the whole peace should one be able to prove that the idea/theory of the most primordial memory is correct/valid in strict scientific and empirical terms? Are there any acceptable methods for carrying out such a scientific-empirical investigation?

Let's look at that matter!
However, let us first allow for a moment to remain at the theoretical advantage of the theory of the most primordial memory, in comparison with a relatively well-known theory from the modern physics research area.
The bigbang theory.

This theory suggests that space and time were born just in the moment when the bigbang occurred, about 13.6 billion years ago. According to the theory, the birth itself happened in something that could be called an absolute nothing.

From the most primordial memory´s angle: Whether space or time was born at the present moment, as both the space and the time before the bigbang existed in its pure inner forms, and when it´s about a birth, that originates from the most primordial memory and this exists in all places in what is physically called space or universe

In the texts preceding the sixth attempt in this particular series (attempts 1-7) the bigbang theory was accepted, but from the 6th attempt, the theory is completely rejected. The reason for this is that at the moment some ideas and thoughts have reached full clarity and power, and via inter alia the ideas as Konstantin Meyl published on the web.

The background to an empirical survey of the most primordial memory.

The critical point could be the size, that is, the size of the most primordial memory, if you initially want to try to measure/compare it with other objects on the so-called elementary particle level.

For example, if we chose a so-called Higgsboson (or part of it) and try to relate it to the most primordial memory, we can say that the Higgsboson (or part of it)) has a size of about 10^-35 mm, so in this context, the size of the most primordial memory should be about the same.
The question that could be asked is if we had access to a scanning electron microscope of the caliber behind the discoveries that led to the 2017 Nobel Prize in medicine (physiology), is there an opportunity to get a glimpse of the most primordial memory?

Or is the current empirical circumstances more elusive and of a different kind or a completely different dignity?

Perhaps we should put a perspective similar to that used in the sixth attempt, which involved the medium the field from modern physics?

The so-called field-based starting point has roots extending to Boscovic, Faraday and Maxwell¹⁰. Simply put, it can be said that the space surrounding an elementary particle, can be approximated to a single field (by the infinite number of fields present in any current space).

The field is said to be a medium that is spread throughout the entire current space.
It´s also such a field that is said to be the source of all present energy. It´s from this medium/field that the current energy is spread/distributed continuously throughout the entire context.

If you want to express yourself as a physicist you can now also claim that it´s the current energy that creates e.g. the electromagnetic field.

On the whole, there are actually clear similarities in what has previously been said above about the most primordial memory and the extent in the classical/physical space and the extent of the field in the same space.
Can this be deduced to Faraday and Boscovic as for the actual field idea as such, and can it be seen as likely that even Immanuel Kant contributed with something in the question?
Boscovic and Kant must have been aware of each other's ideas, for example, about space and time, or at least they must have read each other's texts about the current phenomena.

The field theory (and thus the related mathematics) has over the years been applied to a variety of physical phenomena; Maxwell's electromagnetic waves, The Higgsboson and Higgs mechanism, Dirac's invisible antimatter, Konstantin Meyl's magnetic scalar waves, etc.

Here's how the world should basically look like through the eyes as the idea/theory of the most primordial memory give us an opportunity to look with.

Across the whole of what is today called the physical space (the whole universe) there is a field consisting solely of the most primordial memory.
In this field of all memory, approximately 75% of the total energy of the universe (pure internal energy) is present.
The field is in complete stillness, it does not move in any single direction, has never done it and will never do it.
Either something else (any physical object) moves or is in stillness, for example a light particle and one, for example of gravity, locked light particle, they are first and foremost in this field of all memory, it´s from there that their first input is arranged.
This is where their basic nutrition is introduced, it´s the one that makes it appear at all, something that can be called light.
It´s also this nutritional supplement of energy in its pure inner nature and form that enables us to perceive the world.
This field of all memory also carries up every atom/cell in our brain, in our body, yes, in all biological life here on earth.
This field of all memory is also what generates everything as for now exist in our consciousness.

Each consciousness is of course personal and entirely colored by one person´s own life experiences, but there is also a collective consciousness that everyone has access to, at least theoretically. It´s in this collective consciousness as different researchers and scientists are looking for something empirically interesting, which has not yet been reverted, as correct or not.

In addition to the personal and collective consciousness, there is also an impersonal common consciousness as embodies everything that exists in the personal and collective consciousness.

It´s this impersonal common total consciousness that we can get in touch with from time to time, and then through phenomena that we express such as the soul, spirit, transcendence, intuition, etc.

The whole of the process that occurs in this living field of impurity is constantly recurring. Here is no ideal beginning and no ideal end. What continually drives is the most primordial memory; the memory of us; for example you and me.

DNA and cell biology (adapted from K. Meyl's current paper on the Web) ¹¹

Meyl develops a self-consistent field theory which is used to derive at all known interactions of the potential vortex. Instead of the normally used Maxwell equation. He chooses Faradays law of induction, as a hypothetical factor and proves that the electric vortex is a part thereof.
This potential vortex propagates scalar-like and is a longitudinal electric wave whose properties have already been established a century ago by Nicola Tesla. This phenomenon can now be studied and examined thanks to a fully functional replica.
This field theory is non speculative and enables new interpretations of several principles of electrical engineering and quantum physics. This leads to feasible interpretations of experimental observations which to this day have not been possible to explain via existing theories. For example, quantum particle characteristics can be calculated when interpreted as a vortex.
The theory is based on an extension of the Maxwell theory and as such is a special case scenario that does not affect classic physical laws which remain in force.
The potential vortex is an essential part of the magnetic scalar wave detected in 1990. The basic method of expanded field theory was confirmed in 2009 with the discovery of magnetic mono poles.

For the first time, this gives the opportunity to explain physical life, not just from the biological discipline´s horizon. Nature covers the whole spectrum of well-known scientific research areas with a multidisciplinary way of looking at the phenomena which are required to explain the complex relationships.

The properties of the potential vortex are significant. With its concentration effect, this decrease to a few nanometers creates an enormously high information density in the cell nucleus.

The magnetic scalar wave can be described as the genetic code chemically stored in the genes that create an electrical modulation, so that information is provided from one cell to another cell.

At the receiver end of the current cell, the reverse process takes place and the transported information is converted back to a chemical structure. The necessary energy required to drive this chemical process is provided by the magnetic scalar wave itself

For example, our body related to the magnetic scalar waves
Biologists/physicians are unable to explain what life basically is. Nor can they explain satisfactorily how the cells communicate with each other. The focus has so far been on chemical reactions, but it´s not enough. They have not yet been able to identify the most important communication tool in our body because of their antipathy against magnetic scalar waves.

Maxwell discovered the scalar waves and counted them in his current equations, but after his death many important bits of his wave equations were fused, so that only the Hertz waves survived. As Nikola Tesla rediscovered the magnetic scalar waves through his experiments to transport electricity through the air faster than light, he also was marginalized within tradition-bound science through the same method as above.

Our body constantly generates magnetic scalar waves. They arise when two electromagnetic (Hertz) waves of the same frequency are located exactly outside the phase, so they will go apart by each other's exact opposite as the amplitudes subtract each other. The error in the established science is that the current practitioners assuming that this does not happen.

However, energy never disappears, it only changes to another form. In this case, the electromagnetic wave does not disappear without forming a scalar magnet wave.

It´s then said (by physicists) that the scalar magnetic field returned to its original potential at the vacuum level.


According to Konstantin Meyl, a wave always consists of an electromagnetic part and a scalar part. Sometimes it's electromagnetic consideration, sometimes the magnetic scalar wave part.

Magnetic scalar waves can be manufactured by tying two cables of e.g. copper around a magnet coil. When electric power is applied to one cable in one direction and also switching on electricity in the other opposite direction, the electromagnetic waves that emerge then take apart - and the magnetic scale waves arise.

Our DNA is an antenna that can send away magnetic scalar waves as a transmitter, which also serves as a receiver and thus it can also receive magnetic scalar waves.

Our DNA, which is the cell's power plant, mitochondrial, is in the form of a super-coil. The super-coil´s DNA looks like the DNA in the coil above, and therefore it can generate magnetic scalar waves. Most cells in our body have thousands of such coils that produce magnetic scalar waves in the cell and body.

There are two types of scalar waves: electrical, as Nikola Tesla discovered in 1888 ¹², and magnetic, as Meyl discovered by himself around 1990. ¹³
It´s the magnetic scalar waves that are biologically relevant. According to Meyl, the body has no antennas for electromagnetic waves. Damage from electro-smog is therefore caused by the magnetic scalar waves, which is an important part of mobile technology.

Another device of coil character (as above) is found in our blood system. The constant blood flow through the arterial system is matched by the blood flow from the venous system, which appropriately circulates in the opposite direction, thus forming another coil. Blood circulation through the body reminds of the occurrence in and around the current coil.

Thus, the entire body can send information and energy to each cell and vice versa. This can go faster than the speed of light when the body uses magnetic scalar waves as its main tool. Therefore, images in our mind can be built flash-fast, saying that this is done through a parallel technology - not analogously or digitally.

Our brain also works primarily with magnetic scalar waves and probably has the ability to transform them into electromagnetic waves and vice versa. The left and right hemisphere sends out different magnetic scalar waves, thus forming a so-called scalar-interferometer. Thoughts are magnetic scalar waves. Therefore, they can flash fast with little energy and unhindered to a distant place.

The most primordial memory is of exactly the same kind in every single part of universe.


Notes

1, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Critique of Pure Reason (English title from Swedish) Translated to Swedish from the German original. Lund 1922: 154-164. Print.

2, Kant´s Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, edit. By Beryl Logan. Routledge. GB 1996: 91 – 106. Print.
3, Alf Ahlberg, Science Teaching (English title from the Swedish title) Norstedt & Son´s. Stockholm 1923: 23-40. Print.

4, Edmund Husserl (1859-1938).

5, Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961).

6, Nikola Tesla (1856-1943).

7, Albert Einstein (1879-1955), the presenter of the general theory of relativity; 1915.

8, Roger Joseph Boscovic (1711-1787).

9, Martin Heidegger (1889-1976).

10, Boscovic, Faraday and Maxwell. Boscovic (above).

Michael Faraday (1791-1867) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879).

Maxwell demonstrated that electric and magnetic fields travel through space as waves

moving at the speed of light.

Boscovic is credited for the idea of the field, Faraday and Maxwell “inherited” the

idea from Boscovic.

11, DNA and cell biology (adapted from Meyl's current paper on the Web).16 October 2017.

12, Nikola Tesla discovered the electric scalar waves 1888.

13, Konstantin Meyl (1952 - ) discovered the magnetic scalar waves 1990

14, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla. 18 October 2017.