|
Steps in Getting Published
|
tarix | 07.11.2018 | ölçüsü | 0,56 Mb. | | #78655 |
|
Steps in Getting Published - Decide on a topic
- Choose a journal
- Prepare the manuscript
- Submit manuscript for review
- Revise following feedback
The Editorial Process Considerations for Students
If you can talk, you can write (you just need something to say) If you can talk, you can write (you just need something to say) You can do it!
- Relevance of topic/research method
- Type of audience
- Editorial board composition
- Review process
- Length and style requirements
- Average time to process manuscripts
Check “author guidelines” Check “author guidelines” - Font; Spelling (Canadian vs. American); length; etc.
Structure the paper - Definitions; logical presentation of ideas
Professional presentation APA style - Perfect! Seek out a mentor Proof read manuscript
Choice of co-author(s) Choice of co-author(s) First vs. second authorship Agreement re: subsequent use of article content
Review submission instructions Review submission instructions - Method of submission
- Nearly every journal now requires on-line submission
Submit to one journal at a time
If your manuscript is rejected, you need to consider another journal. Maintain a positive relationship with the Journal.
If it needs revision (the most typical outcome), revise where this will enhance the paper and explain if you did not heed certain requests. If it needs revision (the most typical outcome), revise where this will enhance the paper and explain if you did not heed certain requests. Let the editor know where the changes were made.
Process can take many months Process can take many months - Depends on topic, availability of reviewers, time of the year
Initial review of manuscript by Editor: - Reject outright
- Sent for 2 -3 blind reviews
Reviewers are chosen based on - Interests/Areas of specialization
- Preferred research methodology
Reviewers complete Reviewers complete Reviews are considered by Editor - Accept
- Revise (with deadline)
- Reject
Editors need: Editors need: Must listen to reviewers Change in editorship of Journal likely means change in focus
Who owns copyright? Who owns copyright? Once accepted date of publication is usually provided Authors can get copies of their article from the Journal webpage
Becoming more common Becoming more common Are considered scholarly and high quality Manuscript submission, reviewing and publishing are all conducted through Internet Allow for easier inclusion of pictures, sound, video, raw data, etc. Manuscript length is not critical
CJCP became only on-line in January 2010. CJCP became only on-line in January 2010.
Acknowledge others appropriately Informed consent re: research reports Recognition of study sponsors Age of data Multiple articles on same study
Published articles are of interest to Published articles are of interest to - Counsellor Educators
- Counselling Practitioners
- Field of counselling
Published quarterly by Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association - January, April, July, and October
Distributed to over 4,000 inds.& orgs.
Research reports of relevance to counselling Research reports of relevance to counselling Description of new techniques or innovative programs or practices Discussion of current scientific issues Professional issues or the role of CCPA in society
Critical summaries of published research and/or current issues related to counselling practice Critical summaries of published research and/or current issues related to counselling practice Brief rebuttals or commentaries Papers appropriate for Special Issues
Online manuscript submission Online manuscript submission - http://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/
- Register as a user to obtain username and password
- Click on “submit” and follow instructions
APA Publication manual, 6th Ed. Length of French and English articles - Full length 25 pages
- Fieldwork 14 pages
- Brief Reports 10 pages
Require French and English Titles and Abstracts On-line submission required
Special issue proposals are submitted to Editor by potential Guest Editor(s) Special issue proposals are submitted to Editor by potential Guest Editor(s) Can be French and/or English If approved, Guest Editor(s) prepare “Call for Papers” Guest Editor(s) manage review process
Writers write because they must, not because someone else (even their supervisor) tells them to . . . The wish to see your work in print must come from you, in the first instance. Writing for publication is hard work, it takes patience, persistence, and humility. Writers write because they must, not because someone else (even their supervisor) tells them to . . . The wish to see your work in print must come from you, in the first instance. Writing for publication is hard work, it takes patience, persistence, and humility. H. Crago
Inadequate lit review (too Inadequate lit review (too much/little) of the topic Inadequate description of methodology Discussion section that goes beyond or is not connected to data
Substance Substance - the core of the manuscript (the issue being addressed) Methodology - fully defined & described Style - editorial/writing style Calfee & Valencia, APA
Area of research/practice interests Area of research/practice interests Involvement with a professor’s project Must have something [interesting] to say
Co-author with an experienced professor/writer. Seek a writing mentor. Decide upon a journal and shape your manuscript around their audience and guidelines. Develop an intimate relationship with the APA Manual (or with someone who does). Get feedback from friends, family, peers, and professors.
Work with the Editor to move your manuscript forward (if invited to do so). Work with the Editor to move your manuscript forward (if invited to do so). Take regular “time outs” (particularly after receiving the peer reviews).
Finding the time. Finding the time. Length of time it takes to get a response. Managing your response to Editor/Peer review comments. Deciding how to re-write or edit the manuscript. Finding the time to rewrite.
Sharing your work Sharing your work Connections made with others CV
The Practitioner’s Notebook The Practitioner’s Notebook Instructions at http://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca Brief reports Book reviews Watch for “Call for Papers” - Proposals
Literature review paper Literature review paper - Be comprehensive.
- Tell the reader what we know about the topic and what we don’t know.
- First analyze critically, then synthesize the findings.
What directions should future researchers take? - What directions should future researchers take?
- Implications of the literature review for counselling practice?
Writing a manuscript based on your thesis.
I admire anybody who has the guts to write anything at all. -E.B. White
Email: rcc@ucalgary.ca Address: Kevin Alderson Editor, Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy EdT 322, University of Calgary 2500 University Dr. NW Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|