Tg3e Comment Resolution for i-232,i-233 of Sponsor Ballot



Yüklə 63 Kb.
tarix29.09.2018
ölçüsü63 Kb.
#71086

September, 2016 IEEE P802.15-16-0710-02-003e

IEEE P802.15


Wireless Personal Area Networks


Project

IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Title

TG3e Comment Resolution for i-232,i-233 of Sponsor Ballot

Date Submitted

29, Sep. 2016

Source

[Kondou, Keitarou;Akiyama, Keiji]
[Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp.]
[1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo Japan]

Voice: [ +81-3-6748-4001]
Fax: [ +81-3-6748-4268]
E-mail: [Keitarou.Kondo@sony.com , Keiji.Akiyama@sony.com ]

Re:

In response to i-232, i-233 from consolidated sponsor ballot comments (15-16-0585-00-003e)

Abstract

Add description of Association procedure when DEVID or DEV address are unmatched

Purpose

To respond comment id i-232,233

Notice

This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release

The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.


List of contributors


Name

Affiliation

Itaru Maekawa

Japan Radio Co., Ltd.

Kiyoshi Toshimitsu

Toshiba Corporation

Keitarou Kondou

Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp.

Keiji Akiyama

Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp.

Comment



Comment #

Page

Subclause

Line

Comment

Must Be Satisfied

Proposed Change

i-232

 

7.3a.1

 

It is better to specify the behaviour when the DEVID in the Association Request command is different from the value of the Next DEVID in the beacon for clarity.

No

Specify the behaviour when the DEVID in the Association Request command is different from the value of the Next DEVID in the beacon

i-233




7.3a.1




What happens if the DEV address in the Association Response command does not match with the DEV address of the receiving DEV?

No

Add description for the case mentioned in the comment.

Resolution:

Add descriptions for both behaviors to make them clear

[Resolution for i-232,233]


7.3a.1 Association
Insert the underlined sentences in the second paragraph of 7.3a.1 as indicated;
Before an HRCP DEV has completed the association process, all frames sent to the HRCP PNC by the HRCP DEV shall be exchanged in the PPAP of the superframe. An unassociated HRCP DEV initiates the association process by sending an Association Request command, as described in 6.5.1.1, to the HRCP PNC. An unassociated HRCP DEV can send an Association Request by selecting an access slot at random, after receiving every beacon and starts Association timeout timer. The duration of an Access Slot consists of the length of an Association Request Command and a SIFS. Carrier sense for sending an Association Request is not required. Association Request commands shall be sent with No-ACK policy.

When the HRCP PNC receives one of the Association Request commands, whose DEVID is the same value as the Next DEVID in the beacon, it shall stop sending the beacon, send an Association Response command instead with the same timing as the beacon or later, and start Association timeout timer. If the HRCP PNC receives the Association Request command whose DEVID does not match with the value of Next DEVID in the beacon, the HRCP PNC shall not respond to the command and shall continue sending beacons.

If an HRCP DEV received the Association Response command with the DEV address matching its own, the HRCP DEV becomes an associated HRCP DEV and sends the Stk-ACK to the Association Response command to the PNC.

If the DEV address in the Association Response command does not match with the HRCP DEV’s own DEV address, the HRCP DEV shall ignore the command.

If an associated HRCP DEV or an unassociated non-PNC HRCP DEV which has initiated an association process by sending an Association Request command receives a beacon with a different Next DEVID, it shall ignore this beacon. The HRCP PNC may maintain a list of DEV addresses that are allowed to join the pairnet. If the list is in use, when the HRCP PNC receives the Association Request command, the HRCP PNC shall consult the list to determine if the DEV address in the request is included. If the DEV address is not in the list, the HRCP PNC may send a disassociation command.




Insert the underlined parameters in MLME-ASSOCIATE.response primitive as indicated;
5.3.5.4 MLME-ASSOCIATE.response
MLME-ASSOCIATE.response (

Devid,


PncAddress,

ResultCode,

ReasonCode

)


Submission Page Kondou, Keitarou;Akiyama, Keiji, Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp.

Yüklə 63 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə